I believe he represents the delusional faction!Blue Bayou make over $384,000/year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe he represents the delusional faction!Blue Bayou make over $384,000/year?
You mean like APA? Or perhaps USAPA? The only reason SWAPA has done well is because SWA has had enlightened management.Why? Why is it so difficult? Many have done well, not just SWAPA. Why go for a nationalized self licking ice cream cone?
The opposite of that is also true-
Whenever the results are not what you want, blame ALPA, instead of your own co-workers and reps.
Arguing about ALPA is like arguing about abortion. Pick your side, cast your vote. You're not going to change anyone's mind.
Like the CAL pilots, or Fedex pilots who left ALPA and then came back when they realized that being independent robs you of the structure and resources to represent professional pilots, or maybe like the Airtran pilots, who went with an independent union, then realized they lacked the structure and resources to adequately represent their pilots. The Airtran MEC has been much more functional and capable than the NPA. I don't see the Airtran pilots complaining too much about ALPA, particularly now that they're in the middle of a merger.Opps! Dont do it guys, you'll regret it.
The only thing I blame ALPA national for is using their power to subvert the vote of the membership. They removed my elected reps
denied a recall of reps that were colluding with them to deny membership ratification votes
and denied a ratification vote on giving away my pension, that they gave away in the middle of the night on a weekend.
Some people are willing to pass off the notion of membership voting as something that pilots don't need to do anymore because ALPA is so capable with all the high paid experts and lawyers. Some pilot groups are good with that, some not so much.
All the ALPA bashers are unique in that they collectively fail to see that an ALPA group is only as strong as its local pilot group.
Have crappy local leaders and the end product is going to be garbage. Entrust the group to a bunch of cowboys who are short sighted and lack intelligence and you are screwed. Harvest strong minded individuals who are talented in respective fields and your ALPA group will be solid.
The benefits of ALPA far outweigh the negatives. If the JBLU pilots are able to build an ALPA group that keeps a steady eye on its future without abandoning others past mistakes they will be a tough act to beat.
A clean slate to work from and a young pilot group leaves lots of opportunity. Work hard and stay focused. You are in a great position and I support your endeavors.
Like the CAL pilots, or Fedex pilots who left ALPA and then came back when they realized that being independent robs you of the structure and resources to represent professional pilots, or maybe like the Airtran pilots, who went with an independent union, then realized they lacked the structure and resources to adequately represent their pilots. The Airtran MEC has been much more functional and capable than the NPA. I don't see the Airtran pilots complaining too much about ALPA, particularly now that they're in the middle of a merger.
Whats to stop that under our current working conditions? You have no idea the company has proposed a " scope clause: that allows the company to create or buy a alter-ego carrier with 78 seats or less. 78 seats umm maybe a E-170 vs. the E-190? Right now they could sell off the E-190 and the crews to anyone they feel like. ( ie Republic, Trans States, Eagle). They can do this because there is no senority protection, in a transacation or a furlough. Yeah we have a furlough protection clause, good luck trying to collect if they choose to change the game. No recourse at all.
Spot on. I can't imagine AirTran trying to go through this merger without the resources of ALPA, Had they been independent SWAPA would have rolled right over them.
Well said, the whole USAPA debacle pretty much defines the shortcomings of independent unions when an airline is in trouble. They let the loonies take over and look what happened. The fact that some usapa cheerleaders are on here bashing ALPA should be a pretty good clue to the mentality of the ALPA bashers.
So SWAPA is an independent union - does that mean ALPA is going to "roll over" SWAPA?
Not at all. It means AirTran will have a lot of good resources and support giving them the best chance at a fair integration. Better than if they had stayed independent.
And finally, you guys have a good company and you are a major part of that. ALPA is a great resource for you and offers a lot to benefit your career going forward. Don't listen to the angry self absorbed faction.
Your reps were removed ....
How can you say JetBlue is a "good" company if ALPA is needed here? That statement is contradicting. To me, a "good" company is one that has a good product, has a good reputation, and treats it's employee's fairly. I feel we have that here. It seems that everyone has a different interpretation of being treated "fairly". So why ALPA? Apparently because we're not paid SWA rates, we're not given SWA benefits and we're not given SWA retirement.
Yes, ALPA is going to fix that. They are going to bring us better pay, work rules, retirement, and job security. LOL We may see improvements in some areas but at what expense...furloughs? I would rather sacrifice pay to ensure that everyone on the property will be assured a job and not given a pay cut. Just my perspective.
This the same protection that ALPS gave the TWA pilots? Been there done that, unions are limited in what they can deliver. One thing they can not deliver is job security. I was ALPA at TransAmerican (L-188/DC-8), 1978-79, owner decided he could make more money selling airplanes than flying them, going backward in seniority, airline ended up in 1982 with C-130's in Angola Africa and New Guinea. Folded in 1984, I bailed to the corp. world in 1979. Handwriting was on the wall and there was nothing a union could do to protect my job. Zantop Teamsters (L-188) in 1996, union got in by one vote, first pay raise on contract due 3-26-1997, owner shut the company down on 3-25-1997. Jimmy Zantop figured why risk my $35M, Nothing a union could do to protect my job.ALPA is needed because we have ZERO protections in the likely event of a merger. Jetblue is a good company but it does not feel like protecting the pilot group so most of us have had to put work into protecting ourselves. Did you know M/B does not even apply to us because we lack a certified bargaining agent? Did you know we lack the ability to collectively file a grievance? Forget about benefits and pay for a second because without either one of the above we don't even have jobs.
Lastly, we haven't furloughed because we haven't needed to. We have always been understaffed and during the worst of the economic downturn we were grossly understaffed. It's truly a myth that leadership did us a favor by not furloughing.
Name one airline that is LEGACY that doesn't have RJ's and SWA doesn't count.
This the same protection that ALPS gave the TWA pilots? Been there done that, unions are limited in what they can deliver. One thing they can not deliver is job security. I was ALPA at TransAmerican (L-188/DC-8), 1978-79, owner decided he could make more money selling airplanes than flying them, going backward in seniority, airline ended up in 1982 with C-130's in Angola Africa and New Guinea. Folded in 1984, I bailed to the corp. world in 1979. Handwriting was on the wall and there was nothing a union could do to protect my job. Zantop Teamsters (L-188) in 1996, union got in by one vote, first pay raise on contract due 3-26-1997, owner shut the company down on 3-25-1997. Jimmy Zantop figured why risk my $35M, Nothing a union could do to protect my job.
yea no truth to it what so ever, I mean once you have a union job you have a job for life.Seriously? What a waste of bandwidth this post is.
yea no truth to it what so ever, I mean once you have a union job you have a job for life.
This the same protection that ALPS gave the TWA pilots? Been there done that, unions are limited in what they can deliver. One thing they can not deliver is job security. I was ALPA at TransAmerican (L-188/DC-8), 1978-79, owner decided he could make more money selling airplanes than flying them, going backward in seniority, airline ended up in 1982 with C-130's in Angola Africa and New Guinea. Folded in 1984, I bailed to the corp. world in 1979. Handwriting was on the wall and there was nothing a union could do to protect my job. Zantop Teamsters (L-188) in 1996, union got in by one vote, first pay raise on contract due 3-26-1997, owner shut the company down on 3-25-1997. Jimmy Zantop figured why risk my $35M, Nothing a union could do to protect my job.
good show attack the messenger, As I have said before union have done great things in the past to make this career better, but there are limits to their ability to ignore reality. BTW My career has been an adventure and looking back I am not sure I would have changed much, I don't understand all the unhappiness I see here when guys have my dream job. I will send you a PM.You career never amounted to much and now you're reaching. Settle down.