Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Is ALPA Really Going To Allow This To Happen At UAL??

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

AA767AV8TOR

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 6, 2006
Posts
258
This is our careers if UAL’s management pulls this off!

AA767AV8TOR

www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-mon-outsourcing-pilots-unitemar16,0,5199687.story

chicagotribune.com

MONDAY FOCUS TRAVEL AND TOURISM

Clipping union's wings

United-Aer Lingus plan to outsource pilots on overseas flight

By Julie Johnsson Tribune reporter March 16, 2009. United Airlines is preparing to outsource some international flying, a move likely to spark an uproar as the carrier opens contract talks with its pilots April 9.

Other U.S. carriers and their unions are closely watching a venture being created by Chicago-based United and Aer Lingus that will use non-union crews on new flights from Washington-Dulles International Airport to Madrid, set to begin in March 2010. The carriers plan to add service to two other cities in 2011.

United will provide marketing muscle to the partnership as well as passengers from Dulles, its second-largest hub. The Irish carrier will contribute three new Airbus A330 jets to the Europe-based venture and recruit pilots who aren't employees of either airline to fly them.

If the venture is successful, it could be a model for other carriers to outsource trans-Atlantic flying, cutting labor costs and potentially undermining unionized pilots, a group with the greatest clout over airline operations, analysts said. It also could encourage United to seek broader partnerships with larger European players, such as Germany's Lufthansa.

Some aviation observers question how such potentially contentious and structurally awkward arrangements are financially feasible.

"It's hard to imagine how this makes money," said aviation consultant Robert Mann. He described the labor issues it raises as "incendiary" to airline workers.

The venture also raises questions about safety, since it's unclear who would regulate an airline not based in the home country of a parent carrier. U.S. limits on foreign ownership would not apply either, because the partnership would be based overseas.

"The regulatory framework isn't as airtight as it should be on these issues," said Brian Havel, associate dean and director of the International Aviation Law Institute at DePaul University's College of Law. "It's an entirely unintended and brilliant consequence of Open Skies," a 2008 trade agreement that allows European and U.S. carriers to offer international flights between those regions.

United thinks the model is viable and will expand its global reach.

"Madrid is a market we would not be able to serve on our own," United spokeswoman Jean Medina said.

She dismissed any suggestion that underqualified pilots would be at the controls of the flights.

"We and all of our partners meet or exceed all FAA requirements for flying commercial aircraft," Medina said.

The nation's No. 3 carrier also won't rule out exploring similar partnerships with other European carriers.

"We will continue to look for opportunities to profitably expand our international network using our own aircraft as well as through code-sharing arrangements," Medina said.

United's pilots have the contractual right to handle its flying. But one exception to this rule, negotiated during United's three-year bankruptcy, applies to joint ventures formed by United and Star Alliance partners, such as Aer Lingus.

United's pilots union is furious with the setup and has formed an alliance with counterparts at Aer Lingus to fight it.

"It's a major slap to employees," said Jay Heppner, a Boeing 777 captain for United and spokesman for the Air Line Pilots Association.

Major airlines worldwide outsource flying to smaller cities to regional carriers, which tend to hire pilots at the beginning of their careers to fly turbo-props or jets with fewer than 100 seats.

And British Airways last year spun off OpenSkies, a subsidiary that uses new hires rather than unionized employees to man its all-business-class flights between New York and Paris and Amsterdam.

American Airlines pilots, who also are embroiled in contract talks, are watching the new ventures with concern.

"It does look like carriers are probing at ways to get around unionized pilots on their seniority lists," said Gregg Overman, spokesman for the union. "Clearly, we have huge problems with that."

[email protected]
 
"Madrid is a market we would not be able to serve on our own," United spokeswoman Jean Medina said.


Instead of Madrid, insert any one of hundreds airports across the country that used to see mainline service and now only see RJs and you'll see where this is going.... that same phrase has been said so many times in so many situations it makes me sick.

Unfortunately, many pilots at majors thought RJs were beneath them and didn't see how outsourcing them would harm their careers. Now since they've let the airlines run so wild with it that its the norm, they're now trying it out with international flying... and its going to completely bite these senior widebody guys that had the "when they came for someone else's job, I said nothing" attitude.


Imagine a day where United Airlines doesn't fly any airplanes. All domestic passengers carried by "regionals," connecting at the hubs to a myriad of codeshare international carriers. It could happen.

This isn't the beginning either, its already been happening for years right in front of our faces. There are passengers out there buying tickets on "United" and go to the airport to find out they're flying United Express (ie: GoJet) to ORD and then Lufthansa to FRA and beyond. Thousands of dollars of revenue, dozens of pilots jobs worth of short/small and long haul/ widebody flying, and they're never setting foot on United metal.

Scope needs to be simple. "All passengers flying on X airline and all flights carrying X airline's flight number will be flown by pilots on X airline's seniority list". No exceptions.
 
Last edited:
Of course they will let it happen.

Their bag of tricks only consists of giant blow-up rats and "catchy" slogans.
 
Someone please tell me quickly that this is not as bad as it looks and that it will never takeoff. Otherwise ALPA national and international better find a way to kill this. I am sure the answer will be Ok what else will you give us from your contract?
 
Instead of Madrid, insert any one of hundreds airports across the country that used to see mainline service and now only see RJs and you'll see where this is going....

Unfortunately, many pilots at majors thought RJs were beneath them and didn't see how outsourcing them would harm their careers. Now since they've let the airlines run so wild with it that its the norm, they're now trying it out with international flying and its going to completely bite these senior widebody guys that had the "when they came for someone else's job, I said nothing" attitude.


Imagine a day where United Airlines doesn't fly any airplanes. All domestic passengers carried by "regionals," connecting at the hubs to codeshare international carriers. It could happen.

This isn't the beginning either, its already been happening for years right in front of our faces. There are passengers out there buying tickets on "United" and go to the airport to find out they're flying GoJet to ORD and then Lufthansa to FRA and beyond. Thousands of dollars of revenue, dozens of pilots jobs worth of short/small and long haul/ widebody flying, and they're never setting foot on United metal.


Two things. United management has wanted to be a virtual airline going all the way back to the mid 80's. Every year they get closer to their eventual goal.

As far as mainline pilots not wanting to fly RJ's, that is wrong. The mainline pilots thought flying props was beneath them and those airlines eventually got RJ's and grew into what they are today. This should have stopped before the first airline put their name on the side of a metro, shorts, or whatever. Once that was done the cat was out of the bag.
 
"The Irish carrier will contribute three new Airbus A330 jets to the Europe-based venture and recruit pilots who aren't employees of either airline to fly them."

Sad Truths:

-
ALPA national is rendered powerless, by design, over this multi-national enterprise.

- U.S. law, with some exceptions and also quite by design, will be rendered a moot point in this venture.

- UAL-ALPA, it's Contract, and it's Pilots are effectively neutered by this agreement. ( These are not UAL aircraft. )

- Scumbags will be lining up at the door to fly for whatever this Irish-American-Euro-Trash outfit is going to be called...And they will be quite happy to fly these A330's for $99.99 per hour as PIC. The copilots will be paid $23.00 dollars an hour and they will be ecstatic because they will be 200 hour wunder-kinds with their brand new MPL.


Welcome to The Brave New World.....Accept your reality now and the future will be so much less painful.

Resistance is futile.



YKMKR
 
"The regulatory framework isn't as airtight as it should be on these issues," said Brian Havel, associate dean and director of the International Aviation Law Institute at DePaul University's College of Law. "It's an entirely unintended and brilliant consequence of Open Skies," a 2008 trade agreement that allows European and U.S. carriers to offer international flights between those regions.
Anyone remember when Rez and PCL and I along with Fins and a bunch of other guys were screaming about this last year when GW signed it?

You had to know this was coming... And with UAL's Scope give-back with this loophole, there's absolutely NOTHING that ALPA can do to stop it.

The only thing you can do is force it out through negotiations and the only thing that will likely do that is a strike by UAL pilots, when authorized, in another year or two.

Thanks, GW. Not that I think Obama is any better, but the business-friendly tactics of GW are going to haunt us for years to come in aviation... :(
 
"...the only thing that will likely do that is a strike by UAL pilots."

Correct.

Unfortunately that won't happen due to a variety of factors.

One of them being....UAL could probably have the place fully staffed and up and running again in about a month with a combination of in-house scabs/Management and the flocks of willing scum out there ready to sell their Souls.

Oh, and would'nt UAL love that?

No contracts, no pay scales, no work rules.....Yum,yum.


YKMKR
 
Last edited:
I don't know why there is so much shock and dismay!! Here is a clue, ALPA is a limp organization. They have no teeth and no forsight. Welcome aboard all you tranny folks who think you have found the answer.
 
Just ask a Midwest pilot how outsourcing works. 3/4s of them are on the street and Republic has taken their flying in an "outsource" deal.

Look out Frontier, you're next. You took Republic's money...they'll take your flying.

Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top