English said:
It's not brain surgery, it's flying an airplane.
My point exactly. Seems like some people try to make this job out to be more than it is. I'm not saying we aren't highly trained professionals (who should be paid and treated accordingly), but c'mon, what we do isn't a moonshot back in the days of slide rules. It's not launching off a boat at night in horrible weather and going into combat alone. It's not driving a DC-3 from one grass, oil-can lit strip to another in horrible icing conditions. We fly big, stable, reliable, and (in most cases) wonderfully equipped airplanes straight and level from one modern airport to another, most of the time above the significant weather.
As for this:
I would have to agree with SCT that a 1000 hr pilot at a professional company is a little to low. Can someone with that time fly the aircraft. Sure they can, all planes fly the same. But what about going into TEB at 5pm when the weather is down and NY ATC is doing their usual. Where is this person going to be, probably back at the airport where they took off from.
I do that with new FO's all the time, only into EWR which is probably worse. Most of the time new guys like to handfly approaches, and I can't say I've ever had a problem with it. I mean, if you can't handfly a busy approach in low weather, what training department is gonna turn you lose on line?
Anyway, whatever, it doesn't matter to me. I suppose the more people there are out there that regard lower time guys as incompetent, the less competition there is for mid-time guys like myself.

Just doesn't seem quite fair, is all. How many times have you heard that good departments don't hire the pilot, but the person? I think if I were hiring someone, I'd sooner take the lower time guy I liked (assuming demonstration of basic skills) and accept that he might have some learning to do, before I'd take the higher time guy that just didn't seem like he'd fit in as well. But, what do I know...