1) NetJets was NEVER in danger of folding the tent, even at the absolute bottom of the downturn. The potential civil liability for the Breach of Contract class action lawsuit ran into the multi-BILLIONS. It was WAY cheaper for Berkshire to throw a couple billion dollars at the operation (since paid back, WITH interest) rather than face a courtroom full of lawyers and a jury that LOVES to mine a deep pocket.
2) NetJets IS wildly profitable based on RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL. NO aviation business ever posts big numbers on RETURN ON REVENUE which is what the EMG and BH are demanding. 4% Is HUGE in this business. BH has roughly a billion dollars presently invested in NetJets. Last year's profit was north of $225 million. That is an AWESOME return on invested capital which is the TRUE measure of the success of an investment. Not to mention the contributions NJ makes to the bottom line of BH's FlightSafety subsidiary and whichever BH insurance company covers our airplanes.
Uncle Warren and the rest of the EMT rely on the economic ignorance of many of its employees in order to shape the argument to their advantage.
Au contraire, my fine golfing friend. 4 percent is not huge for businesses in general, actually it is tepid, and after years of losses. If I were WB, NJA would be someone else's headache. And Flight Safety would probably be the trainer for NJA owned by another entity, so that benefit is illusory, in my HUMBLE opinion.
I was in your neighborhood last week, but didn't have time to call. Cheers!