Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, and you're not onboard with us in our fight.
Au contraire, my fine golfing friend. 4 percent is not huge for businesses in general, actually it is tepid, and after years of losses. If I were WB, NJA would be someone else's headache. And Flight Safety would probably be the trainer for NJA owned by another entity, so that benefit is illusory, in my HUMBLE opinion.
I was in your neighborhood last week, but didn't have time to call. Cheers!
So what is the revenue that Flightsafety earns from Netjets. First and foremost we will never know the true number, because it is a way to shift expenses and reduce profits at The union shop. That aside, if ten percent of the pilots go through an initial every year, that would be 270 initials plus 270 recurrents for those pilots. The remaining 90% attend two recurrents per year. 90% times 2700 times 2 = 4860 plus 270 = 5130 recurrents a year. I dont know what a recurrent or initial cost, but i'll be conservative.
5130 x 10,000 = $51,300,000
270 x 30000 = $8.100,000
Annual revenue approaching approximately $60,000,000
Thats a big number.
Oh, and by the way Dude, embarrassing Warren publicly is ABSOLUTELY the right thing to do. It is likely the ONLY way to drive the change necessary to save this company. Sounds counterintuitive, but that's how I see it.
I hope you're right.
Retail on a Gulfstream V recurrent is almost TRIPLE your estimate and initials about double. Can't say about the other fleets. But you can bet your a$$ we pay retail. So your number is VERY conservative.
I agree completely. It was too late at night to call my buds over at CAE. If I was really motivated, I would actually breakdown the cost by the number of pilots in each fleet seeing that this information is readily available.
My point was to show that the revenue supplied to FSI by Netjets is no small number...
If I cross the picket line, I won't be mad at the strikers for trying to shut down my employer, not one bit. But the strikers will be mad at ME for the rest of my life for continuing to go to work. Doesn't seem right to me.
You've said yourself that you're not familiar with labor law. You need to read up on it.
Aviation companies are subject to the Railway Labor Act, a law which is heaviliy weighted against the employees. If we get released to strike and you don't honor that strike, you're weakening one of the very, very few tools that we have under the RLA. So yes, I'd certainly be mad at you for continuing to go to work if we, as a group (that you belong to), vote to go on strike.
Yes you would called a scab just like the guys who crossed the picket line at CAL and who worked for CAL the rest of their lives where they were then accepted into the ALPA union of which they had crossed the picket line.Would you mistreat me for the rest of my life for going to work?
Where is the 250 million per quarter profit going now? 4% ??? Not
Would you mistreat me for the rest of my life for going to work?