Caspian27
Will Ski For Food
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Posts
- 207
All the time? Now who's making incorrect statements?
OK, I concede I did say it wasn't legally possible. That was incorrect. Obviously, it would have been legally possible. The pilots were in fact offered a single list by the company, and the pilots refused holding out for other issues. As I already stated, based on what the company was trying to slip in with that proposal I don't blame them and probably would have voted the same way. I did not mean legally possible, I meant legally required. So what. Your emphasis on that point is semantic and irrelevant to the issue.
The TSA pilots gambled not wanting to make any concessions on voting in the single list and voted "no" so that they could instead force the matter through legal channels, and they lost the gamble. Game over. The matter is now closed and there will never be another such offer from TSAH, nor would the G7 pilots now vote on such a thing.
I have NOT "changed what I say all the time". Believe what you want. There are 19 pages of both sides of the argument, both of them being extremely consistent. I'm Done re-stating things over and over. Refer to previous pages and believe what you want. The horse was dead several pages ago and i don't really care anymore.
Cheers.
Thanks for the response. I didn't mean to insinuate that you were changing your opinion, I just was trying to get an answer from you on what I believed was an inaccurate statement. You did that, so thanks.
I am also done. You guys can decide to believe whatever you want...and the rest of us can believe whatever we want.