Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tired of talking about the Delta TA so...
If you are/were looking at both AS and HA, what are the pro's/cons of each and which would you choose?
but what about the fact that HA is planning all of this crazy growth in the coming years while AS is all about keeping the fleet size relatively unchanged. Thank you for the 737-MAX Mr. Boeing.
Are you being facetious about AS's fleet growth? Since this thread hasn't descended into the usual FI chaos, I thought I'd throw in the "planned" fleet growth over the next few years.
From the Alaskaair.com newsroom:
2012, net +6 ending with 123.
2013, net +6 ending with 129.
2014 net +3 ending with 132.
I know it's not explosive growth, but not insignificant. I haven't looked at actual numbers, but I'm willing to bet our aircraft utilization is way up too. We're seeing more and more redeys. If the utilization rate went from 11 hrs/day to 12 hrs/day that would be like adding another 10 airplanes to our fleet.
OTOH, our seniority list is smaller than it was in 2006 thanks to the new contract and single fleet.
Rumor has it the May bid was just a warmup. The next one will be much bigger.
I also heard the company approached the union about opening up satellite bases in the Bay Area, San Diego, and HNL. I'm sure the union said, "you can do that in accordance with our contract. Oh yah, there's no provision for that."
I've seen a few captains crack a smile with the prospect of a HNL base. I think that's the least likely of the three rumored bases, since the pay rates section of our contract would have to be reopened (not too much of a factor since the union and company are already negotiating), but even more prohibitive would be the expense of moving 50ish crews to open the base.
Cessna,
Thanks for the update, although it's not polite to let facts get in the way with FI banter...... sounds like AS is on it's historic slow, steady, and conservative growth plan.