Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Gulfstream Academy track record

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Well,
Lets see. Everything in aviation is about LEARNED experience. Gulfstream offers a short cut to the airlines. These pilots may learn the basics of flying an aircraft, but they are left behind in experience. Every pilot who has climbed the aviation ladder, has over the years known or heard about the pilot who got his instrument and went out and killed themselves. How 'bout that freight pilot who crashed and killed themselves, ect on and on. Exposure to the process of flying is a cumulative process, experience allows a pilot to adapt and adjust his/her behavior to allow survival in the process, stop learning from the process and the time bomb starts ticking again. Gulfstream and all puppy mill pilots all start out with the experience deficit, over time and experience they can accumulate enough experience to survive. Enough experience in any airframe will provide some insulation from the selection process. The problem lies when the candidate lacking basic fundamental skills tackles a new task(a/c) that the ticking of the bomb starts anew. The proof is in the FARs, no green on green crew pairings, this process is codified to prevent the excessive risk situation. The F/O for all her 1600 hrs was as green as the grass on my lawn 1600 hrs of going round the pattern didn't give her any additional skills that the first 300 gave her. Any seasoned aviator would never raise the flaps during a stall event. A seasoned aviator might reach forward and check thrust, or call out airspeed or sink rate, but raise the flaps? The Captain is the gun, ammo and hair trigger, the F/O is the safety on the gun, if either the captain or the f/o did this job correctly this thread would not be here. There is plenty more I could add but I am now bored and an gonna hit some porn sites, you guys bore me.
PBR
 
Why did it take a third crash for people to go: "Hmmm..!"

A couple years ago, I said the same thing and people jumped on me for using my VA benefits to "buy" a 737 type rating.

Wiki has been all over this, why did it take the Clinton News Network so long?
 
So since they're furloughing, is it just a single pilot operation now?

"Now"? Gulfstream has always been a single pilot operation!:laugh:
 
I got this form the other forum but it is interesting.

The last 3 fatal airline crashes Were Colgan, Comair 5191, and Pinnacle 3701
Colgans Captain = Gulfstream
Comair's Captain = Gulfstream
Both Pinnacle Pilots = Gulfstream


Comments.
Not to deny the entertainment value of several outstanding rants in this thread, but the above list is, of course, very inaccurate. There were at least three other fatal accidents involving US airlines during that same period.
 
WOW!!! Continental Airlines must be proud of that Captain. What a piece of work. I feel sorry for his 2 sons. They have no idea that their father is putting them in harms way by attending this flight school. This is child abuse. Time for the State to step in.


Looks like all three of them can read from a Q-card. It just shows us all how a major will aline themselves with any company that will pay a fee. CAL is no different. So be careful in years to come at CAL if those two are headed there.
 
Keep drinking that company Kool-Aid

Okay here we go again! You people absoultly amaze me with your connections of an accident and GTA. One thing you are all missing is the fact that each one of these individuals has left GIA and was trained at another airline. True each individual you mention was at GTA and flew for GIA. What you are missing to mention is that there has never been a fatal accident at GIA in all the years of opperation since 1991. I have worked at GIA and in the training department since 2000. Our training is not easy, I have had many of the former students talk to me after leaving to another airline and they say that GIA training was the most diffcult. In particular I have some very detailed information on the Colgan case as I was the instructor the taught the CA at GIA. Now the information we provided them was more than satisfactory after they reviewed our training proceduers. They are not so satisfied with the training that the pilots recieved at Colgan, more will be comming out on that in the near future, form the FAA. Same for the Pinnicale flight. It seems the constant is the lack of training the crewmembers received at other airlines, not GIA.

No kidding, you work for CA. I could tell by your first sentence. Nobody is missing the fact that these accidents have happened at other airlines. We are all nailing the fact to the wall that the common thread with three fatal accidents is Gulfstream was the foundation of their formal training. It's Investigation 101 for any fed or LEA.

The reason these prior students came back and said there training they received at your school was because it was their first formal training. I am sure you guys have a more structured training environment then some little FBO style or a mom-n-pop school out in BFE.

No way around it, if you build a ********************ty foundation for a house then the rest of the house will be ********************ty. Same goes for a pilot. Some can be saved and others will not. The FAA should look hard at EACH place the pilots from the three accidents have worked and trained.
 
I just looked through their IBT contract, and it seems that the IBT negotiated a side letter that lets them continue the PFT program while furloughing pilots, they just have to get rid of the PFT pilots within three days after they each complete their 250 hours. I could almost understand this in their first contract, but this is their second IBT contract. Could the IBT really not do any better than that? Come on. Kill the damned program.

Well, one is a training contract and the other is a work-related contract and of course governed by the RLA. If the company didn't meet the terms of the training contract then they be held liable for breach of contract.

As for the IBT, well enough said there. They are not much different then ALPA regarding the parent union shop. The locals are only as strong as the parent union HQ and must pilots involved in both will tell ya that the support (both physical and financial) are limited.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top