Yeah, I work at ASA.
The relevant factors are:
- they can't do domestic feed as cheap as outsourced labor can.
- being able to whipsaw different airlines makes it even cheaper.
- they need bigger airplanes to take advantage of lower CASM and fuel efficiencies
They have to get the pilots to give up scope to make it work.
The way they could do it would be to offer an ultimatum:
Take a large pay increase to give up scope altogether and become widebody only pilots. The retirements and international growth would support that and leave everyone with a seat in a bigger airplane.
Or...
Get NOTHING and DAL spends the hundreds of millions to billions to fleet itself with RJs and pilots to bring it's domestic feed operation in-house.
I'm thinking that given the choice, the DAL group would vote itself a raise and a widebody seat over simply enlarging it's pilot group with newhires that are on the RJs.
Like I said, we'll see how it plays out.
If you were a DAL pilot and presented with those options, it would be completely stupid to pick option 2...it gets you NOTHING and costs an arm and a leg.
John, still smoking dope I see. I can't believe you haven't been caught yet. Probably no supervision on naps to Golden Triangle....
We already have the bigger airplanes here BTW. Mainline planes are more profitable because they have more seats, even though you guys (outsourced labor) are cheaper per hour. Your RJs are actually getting more and more expensive as oil stays high. Your planes cannot compete against Airtran 717s on the same routes, meaning your planes have to go on out of the way or strange routes (like recently announced ALB and PVD to RDU for Flagship) to try to find revenue. How long do you think those will last? My bet, those planes will be in the boneyard 5 months later probably. And because of recent stagnation due to lack of hiring at majors, your FOs are higher paid than normal years (when there was hiring), increasing your normal costs. Longevity is bad for regional costs.
Sure, whipsaw makes it cheaper, but new hiring rules (1500 min or via an approved University program) will again raise costs, and work and rest rule changes due to new fatigue rules by the FAA will again increase your costs and hit at your efficiency.
Do we really have to "give up" anything in a restoration contract? You have to remember, we have leverage because of the large profits currently, and we are aiming to RESTORE things that were taken. You don't really have to give up much when a lot was already taken in BK. No give and take here really. More like give BACK to us.
I have a feeling we will all be watching the CAL/UAL guys in their fight, and it doesn't look like they will be giving in on anything scope related. If they don't get a joint contract soon, I have a feeling things may get a bit bumpy over there. I know the lead DL negotiator, and the good thing is he is not an old fart, rather a younger guy who is very PRO-Scope. I don't know if we could just "go after" all RJs initially, but I would think maybe the E175s first, and then watch the CRJ-200s die on their own, leaving CR7s and CR9s for the next round. At best that means stagnation for you. Sorry about that. SCOPE is important, and it's time for you to understand that. Heck, the Comair guys went for pay only in their 2000 contract and strike, and look where they are now, almost down to 49 total planes. I think most people understand that now. You will too someday. And, you won't see my Hot (young) wife on any RJ flight, she's too scared to fly on your planes. She does love my 757 and 767, though.
Bye Bye--General Lee