777forever
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Posts
- 1,535
I have thousands of hours in 200 and the 700. Are they different, sure. Landing is a bit different too. But, it is a welcome challenge to me. If you want to jump on the bandwagon that it's "Unsafe" to fly both an a daily basis, I have to ask why? If you truely believe that you are operating at 100% capacity in your brain and adding another aircraft type will send you over the edge, then honestly, please quit and find another profession. I don't want you up front when I'm DH in the back or my family is onboard. I seriously want to question your desire to be a pilot if you don't enjoy the challenges of the job.
Sure, we have to work out the $$$ for dual qual, but it stands, in my opinion, to be a win-win-win in my book. We win because we increase the number of aircraft in the pool for schedules to be created from. The company wins for the same reason and also less reserve coverage required. I'm not advocating a furlough. But I am advocating a profitable company. Our customers (Delta, United, etc) win because we are more flexible in providing what they need. Imagine, if you will, that United is ready to add a few 700's to the IAD operation. They will not do it with the seperate ops that we require. Same holds true for DTW adding 200's. And, I will continue to say that we need to look down the road at the big picture that "We" want this airline to go to. For me, that means merging ops with Skywest. Who really thinks that would be a bad thing with almost a thousand aircraft and bases all over the country. Trips that could cover all four corners.
Bottom line is we drew a line in the sand before we ever flew the aircraft that it required seperate ops. Other carriers did not. They have no accident history and a record of growth that exceeds ours.
VERY WELL SAID!!! Agree 110%