Future of Piedmont at LGA?

[WSurf]

ATC can't move traffic on time on a good day, let alone when a could appears in the sky. So I just choose to go as fast as the aircraft was designed to go and get out of the airspace as quickly as possible. I mean people travel by air to save time. And these airlines want us to dick around at .72? Gimme a break!

Well that all made sense! Why after reading that do suddenly feel like a M.I.T. Graduate!

 

[kf4amu]

ATC can't move traffic on time on a good day, let alone when a could appears in the sky. So I just choose to go as fast as the aircraft was designed to go and get out of the airspace as quickly as possible. I mean people travel by air to save time. And these airlines want us to dick around at .72? Gimme a break!

If Dash pilots flew the -8 as fast as it was designed to, the arrival rate would double. Faster approach speeds, and less time on the runway. Unfortunately we gotta wait for the RJ's using 8000 feet of runway because they float and can't stop very well.

 

[Flyer1015]

Unfortunately we gotta wait for the RJ's using 8000 feet of runway because they float and can't stop very well.

RJs float not due to aircraft design, rather, poor pilot technique.

 

[LowlyPropCapt]

ATC can't move traffic on time on a good day, let alone when a could appears in the sky. So I just choose to go as fast as the aircraft was designed to go and get out of the airspace as quickly as possible. I mean people travel by air to save time. And these airlines want us to dick around at .72? Gimme a break!

Huh? The way you wrote that makes no sense whatsoever, but I will take a swipe at it anyway...

Many PDT folks who have been around for a while could back me up on this: Y'all remember when we used to do CLT-FAY? We used to depart about the same time as a mainline Dutch Oven (Fokker 100) that was going to FAY as well. We beat them almost every time. Why? We went low and direct, more or less. They flew way the heck up over RDU to get higher and burn less gas. The moral of the story? On shorter stage lengths cruise speed is not the sole determinant of block time. The same is still true today, LGA-PHL and PHL-ABE come to mind. The block times are the same. The speed only makes a difference on longer routes.

Oh yeah, the other night up in the northeast, when all the jets were canceling flights due to the high winds, the dashes were still safely (albeit not comfortably!) transporting their passengers to and from PHL and LGA. The 36 knot crosswind limitation is nice, and so is the big rudder!

 

[aa73]

The Dash rocks. RJs suck. Next.

 

[kf4amu]

RJs float not due to aircraft design, rather, poor pilot technique.

You said it not me!

 

[WSurf]

Huh? The way you wrote that makes no sense whatsoever, but I will take a swipe at it anyway...

Many PDT folks who have been around for a while could back me up on this: Y'all remember when we used to do CLT-FAY? We used to depart about the same time as a mainline Dutch Oven (Fokker 100) that was going to FAY as well. We beat them almost every time. Why? We went low and direct, more or less. They flew way the heck up over RDU to get higher and burn less gas. The moral of the story? On shorter stage lengths cruise speed is not the sole determinant of block time. The same is still true today, LGA-PHL and PHL-ABE come to mind. The block times are the same. The speed only makes a difference on longer routes.

Oh yeah, the other night up in the northeast, when all the jets were canceling flights due to the high winds, the dashes were still safely (albeit not comfortably!) transporting their passengers to and from PHL and LGA. The 36 knot crosswind limitation is nice, and so is the big rudder!

Hell, even BAL-RDU we took off just in front of the SouthWest flight to RDU. They would touch down right in front of us. If it wasn't for the SouthWest Taxi Speed we woulda bet them to the gate Q400 would have dusted it on that flight.

 

[Metro752]

 

[WSurf]

Why are we even discussing this? We get paid Block or Better! Hell, Flying Low and Slow =$$$$$$$$$$

 

[Metro752]

yep, and quiet