ACL65PILOT
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
- Posts
- 4,621
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DC9's or any mainline aircraft taking flying back is good for the industry. Its the first step to correcting the big scope mistakes. Lets hope you're right. Cheers :beer:
Capturing 76 seat flying at mainline would go a long way toward "fixing" Alpa's greatest mistake.
I am sure that at the end of the day revenue will not matter in the SLI. Wide body A/C, and a whole slew of other things will.
DL brings in 50% more revenue than NW. Cash on hand may be about the same but DL has been spending like crazy buying and leasing new airframes, putting new interiors in the entire fleet and in-seat entertainment systems in 50% of the fleet.
2007 Revenue
DL 19.2 B
NW 12.5 B
A some DAL guys seem to want a fence around the DC-9s. The argument is that if they are parked, those pilots should go first.
What about replacement aircraft? If you fence the DC-9, then ANY aircraft with 125 seats or less (note that 319s have 124) that DAL subsequently gets should be considered "replacement aircraft", thus permitting those fenced pilots first dibs at re-upgrade or recall first. Any previous DAL pilots would be excluded from bidding those aircraft OR if furloughed, being recalled into those aircraft.
Fences work both ways.
This is precisely the reason the Robert's award had subsequent arbitrations. Lots of unintended consequences. Plenty of previous precedent for what could be considered a "replacement" aircraft (IE 330 for a DC10).
Nu
DAL is bigger so i would hope so. Like i said its a moot point and its pointless to argue about it.
Fences do nothing but restrict the new DAL from getting all the necessary "synergies" out of this merger.