Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is pointless to argue this.
You restate the obvious but then ignore the obvious: the company's suit for declaratory judgment. If all goes well it will obviate the need for a DFR 2 suit. Like Judge Wake, Judge Silver seems to see exactly what USAPA is trying to do -- and how wrong it is.FR8Master said:The West cant sue until they have been harmed, again NOT RIPE.
You restate the obvious but then ignore the obvious: the company's suit for declaratory judgment. If all goes well it will obviate the need for a DFR 2 suit. Like Judge Wake, Judge Silver seems to see exactly what USAPA is trying to do -- and how wrong it is.
Last I checked it's still in the courts.Well then I guess it's all settled then.
Ask your colleague who started this thread.So why are we still talking about it?
We're not convinced we're going to to win, we're convinced the law is on our side. If there's justice we'll win.The West is so convinced that they are going to win, then what is the point of the constant " well you said, well she said, well they did this, well you did that.. Enough already
Both sides are angry. The West's anger stems from the East's actions while the East's anger stems from, well, just about everything.Page after freakin page of bashing everything East all the while claiming its the East pilots that are angry.
I made no such claim. The Easties give all people with integrity something to worry about.You claim to have nothing to worry about, well act like it.
Then your vision is severely myopic. A federal court jury agreed.
wrong. All I want is for binding arbitration to be binding. I didn't think that was asking for too much.
Oh, I get it now. This is just like USAPA's response to the Leonidas Brochure series....This is about AGE DISCRIMINATION. That's all. USAPA's argument was all about Ferguson's age and seat he could hold under the Nicolau
Based on these arguments, it sounds like you would be in favor of a DATE OF BIRTH seniority list. Right?
Sorry Charlie, but the court system will finish this. I'm gonna take a wild stab and guess that you won't like the results from that entity either. The difference is that this will be final and binding....really final and binding.
Interesting. You're arguing the fairness of the Nic and I'm arguing the integrity of living up to your obligations. I don't care if you think the nic is fair. Both sides entered arbitration expecting the other to abide by it. Grow up.
Are you still trying to argue the fairness of the Nic? That's so 2007. Welcome to 2011.
Earlier you at least tried to justify what you're trying to do to the West. Now it's back to "It's not fair and everybody owes us".
Since you're not getting it I'll repeat yet again: it's irrelevant if you think the Nic list isn't fair or didn't follow ALPA policy. He's an arbitrator and he makes those determinations, not you or I. Both sides willingly entered into binding arbitration. Deal with it and live with it. See you in Judge Silver's court.
Are you still trying to argue the fairness of the Nic? That's so 2007. Welcome to 2011.
Earlier you at least tried to justify what you're trying to do to the West. Now it's back to "It's not fair and everybody owes us".
Since you're not getting it I'll repeat yet again: it's irrelevant if you think the Nic list isn't fair or didn't follow ALPA policy. He's an arbitrator and he makes those determinations, not you or I. Both sides willingly entered into binding arbitration. Deal with it and live with it. See you in Judge Silver's court.
I guess I'm guilty as charged, however, I hasten to add that my arguments are purely in response to Easties. I must be a closet optimist in that I think presenting reasonable discussion points with reasonable people can actually resolve anything. You and your colleagues keep proving me wrong on that.C'mon TWA Dude - your questioning why someone is "still trying to argue the fairness of Nic from 2007 - to 2011?" That's exactly what you've been doing in hundreds of threads and pretty brochure mailings from AOL!
I think it's both but in any case they're just following USAPA's lead. Don't forget we were close to getting a joint CBA in 2007 when the company was profitable. Nobody to blame but the East for pulling out of negotiations in a snit. If USAPA decides to accept the arbitrated list we could actually get some leverage as a unified pilot group. It's up to you.I will disagree with you though on the DJ that the company has filed - it is just a delaying tactic for some long term strategic goal that they have - it has nothing to do with accepting a different list and a DFR II.
I know you really, really, really want to believe what $eham and Ghengis Cleary have told you but just because the Addington verdict was overturned on ripeness doesn't mean it's like it never happened. A jury of twelve unanimously found USAPA violated its DFR and the company lawyers figure that means it would likely happen again.If they wanted a new contract with certain conditions and restrictions that they felt would be voted in with a majority - it would have happened awhile ago -
You're right. I challenge USAPA to present a TA that the majority of PHX pilots could vote for. I'll look forward to it....if a majority passes it especially in the PHX base - how could that be a DFR litigation II?
If $eham hadn't told Cleary changing unions was a legal way to get around an arbitration the USAPA debacle would've never come to pass. As I said before, you're doing this because you think there's a chance you'll get away with it. The second you realize you can't the dispute will end.Just trying to convey to you some of the reasons for our determination and perserverance.
You're too generous. It was OUR binding arbitration. You know, the one both sides spend months and millions of dollars on. Absurd or not, binding means, oh what's the word I'm looking for, oh yeah, BINDING. Oh, and our contract is more decent than yours and so far a lot of what your so-called NAC has come up with is concessionary. (Plus, we'll lose use of the cabin jumpseat.) As Nicolau stated, the East has a lot more to gain than the West. Enjoy LOA 93 as long as wish.I think you guys need to be reminded of the absurdity of your binding arbitration...it is keeping you from a decent contract.
We all know the East's strategy from day one has been to delay the implementation of the Nic list. In that you've succeeded. If there's justice there'll be high price to pay for your treachery.When will you see me in her court in 2012, 13? If we lose we appeal in 2014...15?
A judge won't force any contract on anybody but s/he can negate any part that's illegal. That's all that required in this case.In 2015 will we get to vote down (for many years) a contract containg the nic or will you guys some how get a jdge to change the RLA and have him force a contract down our throats?
A judge won't force any contract on anybody but s/he can negate any part that's illegal. That's all that required in this case.
Oh, and our contract is more decent than yours and so far a lot of what your so-called NAC has come up with is concessionary. (Plus, we'll lose use of the cabin jumpseat.) As Nicolau stated, the East has a lot more to gain than the West. Enjoy LOA 93 as long as wish.
I just finished SAP'ing my Aug schedule hoping to go from 16 days off to 18. How's Aug looking for you right now? I like our contract.
Go Ahead! Who cares? You can cut off your to spite your face until the end of time. Won't change a thing.I meant when we finally (in three or four years) are forced to negotiate a contract using the nic, will I get to vote no on it? Because I will.
Seriously, you really want to play a game of "our contract is better than yours"? You really think you have something to brag about? Enjoy your SAPing, whatever that means.charlie2 said:I just finished SAP'ing my Aug schedule hoping to go from 16 days off to 18. How's Aug looking for you right now? I like our contract.
Seriously, you really want to play a game of "our contract is better than yours"? You really think you have something to brag about? Enjoy your SAPing, whatever that means.
No, but apparently I'm arguing with one.
(c'mon, you walked right into that one)
I'm curious what the USAPA seniority integration strategy would be in case of a merger with AA - they have furloughees with earlier DOH than many hundreds of Airways east and west pilots including I believe some captains. No sarcasm or flame-baiting intended since this seems to be the most oft-mentioned merger scenario. It's something to think about.
I'm curious what the USAPA seniority integration strategy would be in case of a merger with AA - they have furloughees with earlier DOH than many hundreds of Airways east and west pilots including I believe some captains. No sarcasm or flame-baiting intended since this seems to be the most oft-mentioned merger scenario. It's something to think about.
Well that's an Easy one. You would see USAPA abandon DOH as the "Gold Standard" in a NY minute.
Those slithering scum bags won't stop at ANYTHING to advance themselves at the expense of others.
I just finished SAP'ing my Aug schedule hoping to go from 16 days off to 18. How's Aug looking for you right now? I like our contract.
Gee, with PBS you can do that AND get paid 90 hours or more! And you can set it to do that every month without having to crack a bid sheet!
I can see why you'd prefer to stick with your steam-powered bidding system.
No, not really.
You are wrong...we don't slither.