TWA Dude
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 3,666
If $eham hadn't told Cleary changing unions was a legal way to get around an arbitration the USAPA debacle would've never come to pass. As I said before, you're doing this because you think there's a chance you'll get away with it. The second you realize you can't the dispute will end.Just trying to convey to you some of the reasons for our determination and perserverance.
You're too generous. It was OUR binding arbitration. You know, the one both sides spend months and millions of dollars on. Absurd or not, binding means, oh what's the word I'm looking for, oh yeah, BINDING. Oh, and our contract is more decent than yours and so far a lot of what your so-called NAC has come up with is concessionary. (Plus, we'll lose use of the cabin jumpseat.) As Nicolau stated, the East has a lot more to gain than the West. Enjoy LOA 93 as long as wish.I think you guys need to be reminded of the absurdity of your binding arbitration...it is keeping you from a decent contract.
We all know the East's strategy from day one has been to delay the implementation of the Nic list. In that you've succeeded. If there's justice there'll be high price to pay for your treachery.When will you see me in her court in 2012, 13? If we lose we appeal in 2014...15?
A judge won't force any contract on anybody but s/he can negate any part that's illegal. That's all that required in this case.In 2015 will we get to vote down (for many years) a contract containg the nic or will you guys some how get a jdge to change the RLA and have him force a contract down our throats?