I know that TWA won't get this but let me ask this question to the rest of the fj guys. If KR is willing to staple 13-25yr employes to the bottom of the list and freeze there pay what do you think the future holds for a bunch of guys he doesn't even know and a company he hasn't even owned a year with no contract protection?
I think this ^^^ is a very good question. I think some other good questions are, as a result of accepting employment at Flex:
1. Why would any FO pilot accept - even with a pay freeze - what would amount to an over $7,000 annual pay cut (in lost per diem) which would result from the resulting elimination of his/her contractial meal program benefit?
2. Why would any FO pilot accept a pay freeze?
3. Why would any FO pilot accept the humiliation of at-will employment.
I personally think all of this is nothing but a very lame trial balloon being floated by a few management stooges, at the behest of their masters, here on FI.
Let me again remind all of you what Martin Levit said in Confessions of a union buster:
"For my campaigns I identified two key targets: the rank-and-file workers and their immediate supervisors. The supervisors (or in this case, lead check-airman) served as my front line. I took them hostage on the first day and sent them to anti-union boot camp. I know that people who didn't feel threatened wouldn't fight. So through hours of seminars, rallies, and one-on-one encounters, I taught the supervisors to despise and fear the union. I persuaded them that a union-organizing drive was a personal attack on them, a referendum on their leadership skills, and an attempt to humiliate them. I was friendly, even jovial at times, but always unforgiving as I compelled each supervisor to feel he was somehow to blame for the union push and consequently obliged to defeat it. Like any hostages, most supervisors could not resist for long. They soon came to see the fight through the eyes of their captor and went to work wringing union sympathies out of their workers."