Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flying for the Air National Guard

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

The E-Train

New member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Posts
4
I'm new to this webforum, so bare with me..

I was curious what the flying opportunities with the various Air National Guard units. Do they primarily get guys coming off active duty? Do they hire anyone with no flight experience to fly for them?

I am currently looking to finish my Masters degree and am considering a career in aviation. A pilot friend of mine who goes to my church who flies for American (a former USAF pilot) said that Air National Guard units are a great deal, being able to fly great planes on the weekend, as well as having a "normal" job.

Any info would be great!

Thanks,

E-Train
 
I'm new to the forum too, but here's what I know. First, read my message under "trying to decide" (also in the military threads) about the benefits of Guard/Reserve vs. Active duty. Without putting it all here, I just joined the AF reserve from AD, and it's a different world.
Concerning the no flight experience, that all depends on the particular unit you're looking at. Here's the thing, it saves them time and money if they hire someone who's already trained in their aircraft; quicker spin-up time and less money for them. Next, they'll be looking at some enlisted folks in their unit who want to get a commission and then go to pilot training, sorta taking care of their own, if you will. However, sometimes they do hire guys off the street with no experience, send them to OTS and UPT, and you're in. However, there are some things that will help you with that. If you have any flight experience at all (i.e. going to the local airport and starting lessons), it shows a desire. Probably even more important, is the unit you choose to apply for. Guard/reserve are big on guys who will be with them for a while, not move on after a year or two, wasting their time. For me, I chose Colorado Springs because I went to school here, my wife has family here, and this is a place we want to live. They like that stuff. For example, if you're from Texas, you've already got a leg up for the Ft. Worth 130 unit. I recommend calling up the unit you're looking at, and go to the flying squadron. Don't mess with the recruiter, as he'll tell you whatever you want to hear to rope you in ('sure, we send guys to NASA all the time!'). Hope this lengthy response helps; good luck in your search.
 
Guard units are great. They are also like families, however. That means they all have different personalities...good and bad. Most of them want to hire people that they will LIKE to work with for a LONG TIME. You probably want to be in a unit that YOU like and are liked. So...visit a few of them, decide if you can fit in and they will (for sure) be figuring out if YOU would fit in with THEM.

Most of them will ask "why do you want to be in THIS unit". Replying "because you fly the coolest plane" is not going to win you points. You need to have a reason...like "I'm FROM here and I want to live here the rest of my life...and serve in this unit." So - think of where you call home and start there.

Nice about 'picking' a guard unit is you know what you'll be flying if you make it through the whole process.

I've done both active and guard...and the guard ROCKS!
 
The E-Train said:
I am currently looking to finish my Masters degree and am considering a career in aviation. A pilot friend of mine who goes to my church who flies for American (a former USAF pilot) said that Air National Guard units are a great deal, being able to fly great planes on the weekend, as well as having a "normal" job.

Any info would be great!

Thanks,

E-Train
I'm in an F-15 Guard unit and we might hire 1 newbie off the street on average every 2 years. I don't know what other units are like. It's very competative to get the slot but very worth it. Most guys are experienced and hired off AD.

One other thing. It won't be a weekend flying gig ever. You will spend about 3.5-4 years on what amounts to active duty. It will take almost 2 full years to be fully trained in a fighter and back at your unit. You'll probably be put on full time status for a couple of years to be "seasoned" and get some experience.

You won't be worth much as a pilot in the unit if you attempt to be a part timer without any experience. One of the reasons the Guard hires experienced guys off the AD is they can handle doing it part time. Even as a part timer you'll be flying 8-10 days a month on average. The only weekend flying you'll do is the one drill weekend a month. The rest of the time it's Mon-Fri. Oh, and if you're a full timer, you'll work 12 days in a row since drill weekend will have a Mon-Fri on either end of it. Just trying to give you a little perspective. This is a fighter unit. The heavies have different training and may have a lighter schedule and opportunities to be part time sooner. Maybe one of them will chime in.
Good Luck
 
Iam in the 189th in Little Rock and the guard unit here ONLY takes people that are already in the wing. We take 1 pilot every 2 years!! Most people that go to the board already have time and have been in the unit about 2-4 years. Might want to check out another guard unit besides the 189th.
 
Oh yeah! and you fly alot more than just 1 weekend a month
 
That just reminded me of a picture I saw of a guy on a tank in Iraq holding up a sign that said "one weekend a month....my a$$." Made me laugh.:)
 
gear_guy said:
That just reminded me of a picture I saw of a guy on a tank in Iraq holding up a sign that said "one weekend a month....my a$$." Made me laugh.:)

Saw the same thing on a t-shirt in the sandbox. It was a lot longer than one weekend for them too.
 
Adler is right on all accounts...being a traditional guardsman (at least in a ftr unit) is NOT a weekend/month commitment. Min of 8 days a month (including drill weekend), and like Adler said...you can plan on at LEAST 3 yrs of full time duty/flying to get the basics down. Otherwise, you'll never have a solid foundation of flying when/if you go part-time.
 
Are you paid as though you are on active duty during this 2-3 yrs. of full time duty/flying, or how does that work?
 
Yes, for the duration of your flight training, you will recieve active duty pay and allowances according to the pay tables. You will have base pay, flight pay, an allowance for subsistence and an allowance for housing along with the other perks. (well BAH depends on several factors but we won't go into that)

You are looking at UPT, which is Phases I, II and III; then your formal training unit (where you will fly your assigned airframe; add the IFF course before the FTU in the case of fighters) and then you get back to your home unit.

Now once back home, you will have 'MQT' which is basically a period of seasoning to get you ready; this period is of reasonable length so you should expect to fly almost full-time during this time and be compensated appropriately although I'm not sure if you get all the oher perks while on MQT as you did on UPT.

After that you're a traditional (part-timer). All in all about 1.5-2 years worth of active duty pay and then whatever else for the MQT period before you see the part-time thing.Hope that helps.
 
Yes, it answers my question. Sounds like a good deal!

I just enlisted, officially yesterday, into the 159th Fighter Wing, which is a F-15 unit in New Orleans. I am going to be a F-15 Crew Chief. I am still in college, and a couple of years away from completing my degree, but I plan to apply once that time comes. I enlisted until then, because they are one of those units that only hires from 'within'. Cool thing is, the guy who swore me in yesterday, is the guy I will go talk to about becoming a pilot with the unit. He got word I wanted to fly for them, so he gave me his card and told me to call him when that times comes. Obviously there is more I have to go through than talk to him, but I thought it was pretty cool, and hopefuly a good sign of things to come.

This leads me to another quesion. I have heard that you can apply for a pilot slot within atleast one year from receiving your degree. I've also heard six months. Is this true, can anyone shed some light?
 
Is it hard to maintain 8-10 days if you fly for an airline plus family time? And I was told drill weekends were not always required?
 
My experience from interviewing so far is that , in the case of fighter units, flying is pretty slim. The pilot who drove a group of interviewees to watch the -16's take-off (among which was yours truly) was one of the two most junior pilots and constantly alluded to the fact that all they get is the minimum sortie count per month to stay current, the rest of it is non-flying shenanigans. I personally thought it was still better than to not be flying an F-16 at all, but I understood his POV.

I guess the answer to the question is that, provided you're done with seasoning, it is absolutely easy to meet Guard commitments and have the civilian job, whether it's flying or not. Consequently, I think that would translate into the notion that Guard bumming is not an advisable pursuit if you're in a fighter unit.

I have no direct knowledge of the heavy units, my only experience with them was when I interviewed at a -130 unit and the pilot, who was my first point of contact throughout the interview process, was ABSOLUTELY GLAD he had the Guard gig, as he was furloughed from AA. I've also heard that Guard bumming is somewhat more fruitful at heavy units and I think that's totally compatible with the environment of military flying nowadays.

Personal rant: I find it interesting when some people get the sheer luck to get to the single-seat cockpit and start b!tching when their time building isn't skyrocketing. Jesus, if ya wanted to fly for the airlines you should have gone heavy, leave those d@mn Viper/Hog/Eagle slots for folks like me who have done everything up to this point to do single seat flying and have no desire for airline jobs. Now, not all 121 pilots who part-time as fighter pilots are like that kid, so I will give that to balance the argument. As I was looking at that kid go on his little soapbox I stared at him and said to myself "sheesh, if this kid made it past Vipers I'm gonna be f$ckin Chuck Yeager" so I guess I got some reassurance out of it :D
 
As a Guard Baby (off the street UPT hire) I can tell you that meeting your ANG flying requirement is getting harder every year.

If you go to a heavy unit, expect to not only meet all training requirements but deploy overseas as well. Currently they have cut our flying but increased our training requirements. Some tool, AKA Active Duty, higher up in the food chain can't figure out that eventually people will say "uncle".

Most pilots are saying that if they can't meet there squares than "oh well, give me more flying!!"

Hey Hindsight !!

I would say that any cockpit in the ANG is a lucky job. Plenty of good fighter guys will be knocking on the doors of heavy units after the BRAC. Hopefully some one doesn't pull that quote about the airlines out of there pocket during an interview and ask you to explain it. Chill out and enjoy anything you fly because you may be one of those folks knocking on our door one day.

CLAMBAKE
 
I think you misunderstood my comment. I was just alluding to the whining I perceived from this kid who happened to be in a position I've been trying to attain for as long as I can remember. The fact that it happens to be a fighter slot should be incidental to you; don't start the fighter/heavy thing, I wasn't suggesting that.

On the topic of gratitude, I stand corrected. What's funny about the "hopefully some one doesn't pull that quote" comment you made is that I've already had the opportunity to VOLUNTEER it at interviews. Not only that, but opportunity to ELABORATE on it. They don't have those fighter/heavy sensitivities, I'm not scared of telling them I don't have inclinations to fly 121 and that my civilian aviation career expectations lie in other flying jobs and pursuits, more in tune with my desires and motivations...there is life,work, flying, and aviation outside 121 you know......

I've been upfront and honest about that particular personal and professional preference to them. As a matter of fact, they actually appreciate a person who comes to the interview and answers the question of "what's your plan" with an answer OTHER than "weeeaalll, I was hoping to bum aorund, maybe get and AGR posit and wait for Delta to call". And considering there are regional and major guys alike at these boards who have personally expressed their complete satisfaction with the answers I've provided to that particular issue you raise I don't feel one bit threatened by your implication that I'm burning bridges. I've never had a major guy get sore cause I don't want to fly 121. Not to mention that 121 hopefuls are already surplus enough to make my point moot.

I do apologize if my comment shafed you the wrong way, I wasn't trying to suggest anything else other than what my impressions were of that particular guy and what I considered to be ingratitude on his part, not mine.

No hard feelings bud. I'll go chill now :D
 
Hindsight,

I've been doing this for a long time. I have learned long ago not to have a heavy/fighter thing. You can usually tell the quality of a pilot not by what he flies but by how he flies. In the end the ANG/AFRES guys usually finish well above the AD students in UPT. So the type of airplane they fly doesn't matter.

As far as the job goes, it's good to have the desire for a fulltime ANG job. They are good jobs and if you can get one take it. I remember interviewing for my pilot slot, 1992, and answering the same way you did. When the jobs didn't happen I was applying at all the airlines. Don't disregard the 121 stuff. It's a good life, especially the furloughs.

Peace, out

CLAMBAKE
 
psysicx said:
How long does a typical fighter sortie take from start to finish?

I don't think there's such thing as a "typical" sortie. If it's BFM (1v1 Basic Fighter Manuevers) and your MOA is close to your base, it might be a 30 minute sortie. If it's a 4v8 with a tanker, you might be looking at 2 hours. Probably the average is 1.0-1.3 hours.
That's only the flying part. The 1 hour brief starts 2 hours prior to takeoff. The debrief will be something like 2-8 hours depending on the complexity of the mission.
 
psysicx said:
So Adler how is it hard to manage family time with the airlines and guard?

It's a sacrifice but it's also not impossible. Most guys drop at least one airline trip to work at the Guard. That way, you're not giving up real days off to do your Guard duty and you're home at night with the family (unless the duty is a deployment). Dropping more trips is situation dependant. Some guys will work on their airline days off but that definitely can hurt the family time. Most likely the average Guard pilot is going to do a little of both. This used to mean losing some pay if you were at all senior at an airline (Guard pay was less than the airlines). The way things are going now it's probably a wash (or you may make more at the Guard). Cargo/Tanker type units have to go TDY more regularly and may tend to spend more time away while fulfilling their Guard commitment. I can't speak much to their schedule.
 
hindsight2020 said:
Personal rant: I find it interesting when some people get the sheer luck to get to the single-seat cockpit and start b!tching when their time building isn't skyrocketing. Jesus, if ya wanted to fly for the airlines you should have gone heavy, leave those d@mn Viper/Hog/Eagle slots for folks like me who have done everything up to this point to do single seat flying and have no desire for airline jobs. Now, not all 121 pilots who part-time as fighter pilots are like that kid, so I will give that to balance the argument. As I was looking at that kid go on his little soapbox I stared at him and said to myself "sheesh, if this kid made it past Vipers I'm gonna be f$ckin Chuck Yeager" so I guess I got some reassurance out of it :D

Hey Jack@$$....

Until you've been there, done that, and got the t-shirt...much like that 'kid' you were referring to...do us all a favor and just shut up and color.

This is a small, tight-knit community, and if you want a snowball's chance in he!! of ever getting a slot, your mindset better do a hasty 180 pronto!
 
why is it that people get so upset about a comment that doesn't pertain to them?

Go re-read the post, internalize it doesn't pertain to you (unless you're a whiner that shares the same views as that LT) and kiss my @ss, I'll go color at your mom's, punk.
 
hindsight2020 said:
My experience from interviewing so far is that , in the case of fighter units, flying is pretty slim. The pilot who drove a group of interviewees to watch the -16's take-off (among which was yours truly) was one of the two most junior pilots and constantly alluded to the fact that all they get is the minimum sortie count per month to stay current, the rest of it is non-flying shenanigans. I personally thought it was still better than to not be flying an F-16 at all, but I understood his POV.



Dude,

It sounds like you’re drawing quite a few conclusions from your little tour of a “Fighting Falcon” unit. It sounds like that unit might have an over-manning issue. Perhaps the leadership is doing a bad job managing their flying hours and hiring. If they are benching their “junior” pilots (i.e. inexperienced Lts) and letting experienced guys fly, the unit definitely lacks leadership. Those Lts are exactly who needs to be flying, the experienced guys can suck it up. That’s not how a well run fighter squadron does things.



hindsight2020 said:
I guess the answer to the question is that, provided you're done with seasoning, it is absolutely easy to meet Guard commitments and have the civilian job, whether it's flying or not. Consequently, I think that would translate into the notion that Guard bumming is not an advisable pursuit if you're in a fighter unit.
hindsight2020 said:




Guard bumming works quite well if your unit is manned properly. It also helps to have experienced leaders who know how to find days and dollars to pay their pilots in need. A good unit can always find a way to pay its pilots. It also helps if the whole unit is not furloughed from an airline. We had at least 12 pilots furloughed from UAL and no one went without a paycheck.



hindsight2020 said:
Personal rant: I find it interesting when some people get the sheer luck to get to the single-seat cockpit and start b!tching when their time building isn't skyrocketing. Jesus, if ya wanted to fly for the airlines you should have gone heavy, leave those d@mn Viper/Hog/Eagle slots for folks like me who have done everything up to this point to do single seat flying and have no desire for airline jobs. Now, not all 121 pilots who part-time as fighter pilots are like that kid, so I will give that to balance the argument. As I was looking at that kid go on his little soapbox I stared at him and said to myself "sheesh, if this kid made it past Vipers I'm gonna be f$ckin Chuck Yeager" so I guess I got some reassurance out of it



What exactly have you been doing to qualify as “doing everything up to this point to do single seat flying”? If you still meet the age requirements to go to UPT, I seriously doubt you are old enough to be calling a current F-16 pilot “kid”. Seen one too many episode of “Black Sheep Squadron”, eh “Pappy”?



I doubt the pilot in question started flying F-16s just to build time for the airlines. He was probably just b!tching because he wanted to fly. I have to question your logic that says: I’m not as big a “tool” as that guy so I’m going to be Chuck Yeager. I’ve known a few pilots who lacked some people skills and could still flying the jet like a wizard. After a few years in this business, I would recommend letting your flying talk for you and judge other pilots the same way. With 250 hours of light airplane time, if I talked at all, it would be at a whisper ;) . If you really want to be a fighter pilot, lose the attitude until you have some wings and experience to back it up. Just my .02



hindsight2020 said:
why is it that people get so upset about a comment that doesn't pertain to them?…….



Because this isn’t a 1v1 forum. If you post something here, expect others than your target to read it and have an opinion. You basically posted scoffing at a pilot who has proven himself enough to be in the position you strive to hold. If you don’t see a slight problem with that, you probably should give up your quest now. Your attitude will doom you to failure in UPT, never mind the demands of the Fighter Training Unit.



Good Luck
 
psysicx said:
Is it easy to drop trips? Or does your airline understand that you fly in the guard?

Most Majors are very familiar with the Guard. You just make a call and tell them the days of your duty. The Guard unit sends a letter or copy of orders and they put the Mil days in your schedule. If you had a trip on those days it goes away. You obviously don't get paid for the trip. Actually, if you're at American, they can drop 4 days a month without losing pay. Most others just drop the trip and it's pay.
 
Adler,

Well said !!!!

Is AA still doing the 4 day a month for military? That was an awesome deal. I haven't flown there in over two years and thought they lost that in the contract changes.

CLAMBAKE
 
pkober said:
Adler,

Well said !!!!

Is AA still doing the 4 day a month for military? That was an awesome deal. I haven't flown there in over two years and thought they lost that in the contract changes.

CLAMBAKE

I'm just repeating what AA pilots in my unit have said - I was a UAL dude. I had not heard that it had been negotiated away. I have not been following that stuff too closely lately. Found a new permanent (hopefully) home at big purple and have had a rapid drop in my "give a sh!t-factor" about my former life :D .
 
hindsight2020 said:
why is it that people get so upset about a comment that doesn't pertain to them?

I'm not upset, I'm simply covering that LT's ass because in his attempt to tell you how it is you thought he was whining. Check the attitude and shut your pie hole, because I've seen people like you come and go at UPT boards, with a huge emphasis on the GO.

Go re-read the post, internalize it doesn't pertain to you (unless you're a whiner that shares the same views as that LT) and kiss my @ss, I'll go color at your mom's, punk.

Hey, let's get off moms, 'cause I just got off yours. In your version of life called Utopia, there's no way a LT who gets to fly Vipers should bitch about anything. Well, welcome to reality. You have no idea what it's like, 'cause you ain't been there yet, boy! This guy was being honest about the real deal to you and a bunch of other prospective UPT applicants, and you took it as whining. You shouldn't get on any soapbox unless you know of what you speak. If you can't realize when you've been called out for talking out of your a$$, then you obviously don't have what it takes to make it through IFF or the RTU - should you get that far.

Good luck...you're gonna need it.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom