Let's be realistic, the only option for most of us these days is ride out the storm and try to improve the conditions where we work now.
You're absolutely right. And does the TA do that in the short term? I think it does. If one doesn't agree, then they must believe it is worth the risk of at least another 6mo to a year for (what I think will be) very little gain beyond this TA.
This is a first contract. By most accounts, an extremely good first contract - attaining much that many never get in their first attempt. FlOps management was NEVER going to agree taking the NJ contract and stamping Flight Options on it. I believe some harbored this very unrealistic hope.
Contractually mandated work rules and protections. Many of the work rules in the contract only codify the ones we have in place, but some are indeed improvements (a 14hr duty day limitation on Day 8, for one). I've found NONE that are worse than what we have currently in place. I'd say that's a pretty good job at negotiating.
Pay does not increase as much as we would have liked - year 1, anyway. But with the time-value of money being what it is, I cannot think of a scenario where the gain would make up for what will be left on the table if the TA is not ratified in this election. This scenario becomes worse if, because of the ensuing labor actions, business worsens. You're not being realistic about potential gains/losses to a contract if you are discounting this very real possibility.
Many wanted a 7and7 schedule, and it will be available. There was never a scenario that I could have imagined without some form of "Flex", "Reserve", or what will be known to us as a "16+2". That was the compromise. And because we, as a pilot group, are generally a greedy bunch I think senior pilots will take more of the "16+2" than some believe.
Our E-Board and negotiators have done a good job. And I know everyone has read the union communication, but it is fact of life that the negotiators were faced with an unbelievable challenge of negotiating in a horrible - and unforeseen - economic environment.
I'll be voting
YES.