GhettoBeechjet
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Posts
- 429
I'm not "Ed".
I didn't say the 'reduction in all employees compensation packages is good for the company', I meant it was necessary to remain open. Plus, how do you know that senior leadership hasn't been included in the reductions? Fact only here please.
The former CEO/COO are not relevant anymore. Just let it go.
Define FUD (in your view).
Deny, Deny, Deny. I don't care what you say I still believe you are Ed. If you aren't you certainly share his views and writing style. 1. Let what go? Since the cuts that the previous adminstration imposed remain mostly intact they are relevant. 2. In most cases when a leader has shown the leadership to take cuts along with the regular working stiffs they are very public about it and use it as a rallying point. I have heard no such claim from this or the previous administration. If the cuts were needed to keep the company afloat a good leader would have not only taken a cut but disclosed and discussed it. If Kenn is really strictly looking afetr his investment he would be working on a $1 salary with no bonus and tell everyone about it.
FUD= fear uncertainty and doubt. Basically anything designed to undermine the solidarity of the union. I beleive your anti union fervor is strictly motivated by self interest Ed. A contract would affect your "special deal" and put you on the same level as everyone else. What a blow to your ego would that be. You would no longer be "special" Ed.