Clyde
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2004
- Posts
- 660
Do you guys think it's professional to respond to "cleared for take-off" with "cleared to go"? I don't.
I have to agree Mach80 on this one. While I understand that some of you may peg Mach80 for being too anal or uptight with regards to proper phraseology on the radio, I think he is bringing up a good topic of discussion. And I believe many of you would be doing yourselves a disservice by ignoring it.
I will bring up a good case in point as to why one should aim to practice proper phraseology and good radio technique: habits.
Another case in point is flying in the international arena. Most controllers in foreign countries don't speak conversational english. Rather, many know rudimentary english and others may only have an understanding of basic english with regards to ATC. In other words, they only know proper ATC phraseology. Anything other than that may confuse them.
"on the hold" may work for you in a Cessna 152 at the local rural airport in the middle of nowhere. If the controller in Hong Kong tells you to "Line up and wait, zero seven right", you will respond with "line and up wait, zero seven right". If you respond with "on the hold", the controller may ask for confirmation until you get it right.
On a previous post in this thread, someone brought up the words "tree" and "fife" for 3 and 5 respectively. Here is what was said:
Who keeps saying "fife" and "tree"... that's so last year!
Well, open up your J-Aid and look in the section titled "Tables And Codes". You will find a section which contains the Morse Code, Phonetic Alphabet, and numbers with HOW TO PRONOUNCE THEM.
9 = Niner. Guess what else it says?
3 is pronounced as TREE
5 is pronounced as FIFE
And even 4 is technically pronounced as FOW-er.
So much for being "so last year!".
Last edited: