Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
UPS and FedEx will surely do better.Prop Trash said:Name one post-9/11 contract that has been signed that is better than this. Name one airline that is in section 6 negotiations that you think will do better. That's all I ask.
Prop Trash said:Name one post-9/11 contract that has been signed that is better than this. Name one airline that is in section 6 negotiations that you think will do better. That's all I ask.
How about we stop talking about pre and post 9/11 contracts and start talking about pre and post X-Jet contracts. It's time to raise the bar.Prop Trash said:Name one post-9/11 contract that has been signed that is better than this. Name one airline that is in section 6 negotiations that you think will do better. That's all I ask.
Compare apples to apples here. ExpressJet, like every other "small-jet capacity provider" is only a charter company that bids on flying for major network carriers. You can barely consider any of our companies "airlines." We don't sell tickets, we don't market our product, we don't set our schedules or decide where we want to fly, we don't keep the money people pay to ride on our airplanes.Posted by Rhoid
UPS and FedEx will surely do better.
The network carriers were adversely affected by 9/11. They're hurting for cash, looking for cheaper ways to move people from A to B. They've placed pressure on the small jet carriers to lower thier costs so that the capacity could be purchased for less money. That trickles down to us. The legacy carriers are looking for the lowest bidder to do thier flying and as a result, the pressure is put on the managements of our companies to get the cheapest costs possible so they can competitively bid on the flying.Posted by PCL_128
The regionals were not adversely affected by 9/11.
What an appropriate handle.Prop Trash said:Compare apples to apples here. ExpressJet, like every other "small-jet capacity provider" is only a charter company that bids on flying for major network carriers. You can barely consider any of our companies "airlines." We don't sell tickets, we don't market our product, we don't set our schedules or decide where we want to fly, we don't keep the money people pay to ride on our airplanes.
The network carriers were adversely affected by 9/11. They're hurting for cash, looking for cheaper ways to move people from A to B. They've placed pressure on the small jet carriers to lower thier costs so that the capacity could be purchased for less money. That trickles down to us. The legacy carriers are looking for the lowest bidder to do thier flying and as a result, the pressure is put on the managements of our companies to get the cheapest costs possible so they can competitively bid on the flying.
The XJT TA was negotiated in the worst time possible and it came out with gains in every single section except for moving expenses, which was changed to an industry standard provision. The working rules and other provisions allow for a significant amount of soft time and other add-pay opportunities to make it the most expensive contract ever negotiated in our segment of the industry.
I think our NC has done very well to present an acceptable TA given the state of the industry.
As is yours...with your nonstop bull$hit and drivel.nonstop said:What an appropriate handle.
Great Post. Well put. Dollar is a dollar. They can have there day off, retro check, and profit sharing. Show me the money!172driver said:It may be labelled as the "most expensive" contract in history, but if I were evaluating it, I would want more guaranteed money (i.e. pay rates) rather than profit sharing, retro pay, red flag trips, etc.
If it is truly the most expensive contract in history, the company should have no problem shifting some of that expense from other sections of the contract into the pay rates, right? A dollar's a dollar.
Yes, other things are extremely important...duty limits (which are weak in this TA), rest rules (weak), segment pay (industry std.), rigs(none). These things are worth giving on the pay rates, IMO.
Profit sharing...if there's a profit and if they choose to show it on the books, it will be nice but no guarantees.
Retro pay...nice but not worth sacrificing long term pay, and they owe it to you anyway for stalling the negotiations while you worked for less.
Red flag trips...once in a blue moon you might have a shot at one, no money there.
What I see is pretty mediocre, pay wise...
$5<Comair
$2-3<Mesaba (Avro)
+/- $1 with SkyWest
$.42-1.00 >Chautauqua
$5 or more<Horizon (T-prop rates)
6 yr FO makes what a CMR FO makes just out of probation.
Someone tell me why or what is in this TA that makes it so expensive or valuable. What's in there that other regionals don't have that would be worth $5000+ per year in pay? If there is something worth that much, ask yourselves why the company didn't just put it in the rates.
I'm not saying it's a bad TA. I'm not telling anyone how to vote. I just have a problem with this thing being called "the most expensive" in the industry. If it is, why hide the money, why make it intangible or difficult to measure? Just give it to me in my hourly rate, ty.
10 minutes of pay credit at the hub airports for clearing customs after an international flight.Anaconda said:what's "customs pay"?