TEXAN AVIATOR
Bewbies
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2002
- Posts
- 1,132
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fly2Scuba, see this thread:Fly2Scuba said:Well yesterday before seeing the full TA, I was leaning toward yes based on optimism. Upon further review of the play, conclusive evidence points to NO. I think this presidential election might have some bearing on this vote also since the election is held before the vote ends I believe. Kerry is scum, but if he wins, even more leverage to negotiate for mo money should this TA be shot down.
Thank you for the kind words. Earlier this evening, a 27-page highlight and summary document was emailed to all pilots as well as the full (200+ pages) TA, and 53 pages of pay examples for the leg by leg pay system. There is far more to this agreement than just pay rates. Obviously, I will encourage our pilots to attend a road show as that is the proper forum to hear what we have to say and subsequently have questions answered as well as a chance to voice concerns.BoilerUP said:I presume this is the correct, same TA that was originally supposed to be released tomorrow?
If so, I must say I am a disappointed in the FO pay rates, after all isn't that what many in the peanut gallery blasted CHQ about, "throwing the FOs under the bus for growth" or something to that effect? I'd think a first year FO is worth at least $25/hr and a 5th year FO at least $45/hr, but then again I'm partial (I'm not hired yet). The captain rates, while not Comair + like so many here boasted they would be, don't seem too awful bad, but don't seem to be that much higher than CHQ. Also, as was previously mentioned, no "leaked" rates for 70 or 90 seat aircraft (I dont know if this is a good or bad thing).
There will be MANY pilots on this board dishing the few hardline XJT pilots on this board that blasted CHQ and Mesaba for their contracts if this is approved as it stands. Without the current XJT contract and the whole actual TA in front of me, I won't say what I would vote because that isn't important.
Regardless of the outcome of this TA, I once again would like to thank Neal (especially for his postings on this board) and the whole NC for their hard work; it sure seems to be a thankless responsibility.
Well I guess you could say we got our contract because of your Low current contract, so its just a cycle.mckpickle said:Well ya we blasted CHQ and MESA, and its because of your contracts that we have what we have.
ps I love the scope section. Reads real nice for mergers of ALPA carriers. Hey CHQ you guys are teamsters right?
mckpickle said:Well ya we blasted CHQ and MESA, and its because of your contracts that we have what we have.
ps I love the scope section. Reads real nice for mergers of ALPA carriers. Hey CHQ you guys are teamsters right?