Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Endeavor Flow for New Hires

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Or, how about spreading some of those massive legacy carrier profits so the regionals that remain can make a bit more, and therefore attract new hires with decent pay and conditions?

So mainline can continue to support unprofitable flying via RJs? Nah. As PCL stated, let's instead buy more 717s or 319s and replace RJs with jobs that pay more with better benefits. The only people who don't want that are lifers at the Regionals. Unfortunately for them, they have many things stacked against them, including high gas prices (inefficiencies especially with 50 seaters), fewer pilot starts due to sour economy and high prices, new hiring rules (1500 hours or 800 via Riddle), and 15,000 pilots needed by the 3 legacies alone in the next 10 years. It ain't looking good for Regionals or lifers there. I'd be looking around for alternate employement and realize that the sooner you get on with a growing airline or one with huge retirement numbers coming, the sooner you will regain those weekends off and multiple weeks of vacation per year

Eventually I bet the legacies will hire directly from special schools that select candidates and run them through 2-3 years worth of training to get them into the right seat of an Airbus or Boeing. They will have 1500 hours, but tied in with the schools.



Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Last edited:
They would love to serve some markets with smaller airplanes; just as long as they don't have to pay much for them. As soon as they have to start paying fair wages, it's no longer economical. The seat mile costs are just too high.









Crew costs are a small percentage of the total operating cost of any regional jet. Pay and benefits could easily be increased with only a marginal increase in the total operating cost. Those few extra dollars would be a lot less than the hundreds of millions they would lose, if they lost the current level of feed from those underpaid regionals! How does management get everyone to buy into their constant claims of "poverty", even when they're pulling in record billion dollar plus quarterly profits?:puke:
 
Crew costs are a small percentage of the total operating cost of any regional jet. Pay and benefits could easily be increased with only a marginal increase in the total operating cost. Those few extra dollars would be a lot less than the hundreds of millions they would lose, if they lost the current level of feed from those underpaid regionals! How does management get everyone to buy into their constant claims of "poverty", even when they're pulling in record billion dollar plus quarterly profits?:puke:

What regional is making record profit? Regional pilots are paid by there company.
 
Certain regional routes may be considered unprofitable, however maybe 50% of the passengers on a particular flight might be connecting transoceanic.
Take those seats away, and your profits with them?
Not many of our passengers are solely travelling on our carrier to their final destination. Most connect, and many are high dollar routes.
Pay can certainly be raised at the regional level.
 
Certain regional routes may be considered unprofitable, however maybe 50% of the passengers on a particular flight might be connecting transoceanic.
Take those seats away, and your profits with them?
Not many of our passengers are solely travelling on our carrier to their final destination. Most connect, and many are high dollar routes.
Pay can certainly be raised at the regional level.

Instead of 6 daily RJs, you can replace those with 3 daily 717s and keep those connecting pax, while not worrying about filling new hire pilot classes. Problem solved.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Instead of 6 daily RJs, you can replace those with 3 daily 717s and keep those connecting pax, while not worrying about filling new hire pilot classes. Problem solved.


Bye Bye---General Lee

Sweet, three choices of flights, only one that makes a connection to Tokyo and involves a 7 hour layover. Everyone's reliving the 80s with their hair styles and clothing, why not get the full effect and bring back the 80s airline service as well.

If only the New York subway would realize that one car that can hold 1,000,000 people travelling the lines three times a day would be so much easier for the people than a car that runs every few minutes.
 
No General...... That won't work and you know it. The competition will not allow it. You just want to keep stirring up emotions of regional airline employees who work so hard to make you money.
I once thought you might have some intelligence. I must admit I was wrong.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
 
Instead of 6 daily RJs, you can replace those with 3 daily 717s and keep those connecting pax, while not worrying about filling new hire pilot classes. Problem solved.


Bye Bye---General Lee

I'm, that might work, but Delta doesn't have an endless supply of 717s
 
if they lost the current level of feed from those underpaid regionals!


They won't lose the feed silly, they will trade freq for bigger mainline jets. Plus, they will need those pilots at mainline gigs over the next 10 years.


Sweet, three choices of flights, only one that makes a connection to Tokyo and involves a 7 hour layover. Everyone's reliving the 80s with their hair styles and clothing, why not get the full effect and bring back the 80s airline service as well.

If only the New York subway would realize that one car that can hold 1,000,000 people travelling the lines three times a day would be so much easier for the people than a car that runs every few minutes.


Some mainline companies are gearing themselves up for that direction even if you think it is silly. Everyone thought losing the 1980s level of service would effect the bottom line, it absolutely did not. Delta, for instance, had some analysis done and feel confident they can risk the change in freq. Worst case, they go back to what they are doing now and shrink their margins. Right now they are as confident, as anyone can be in the real world, that they can control more flying and increase margins by bringing most of it in house (minus the 70 seater market).


I'm, that might work, but Delta doesn't have an endless supply of 717s

Good thing they don't need an endless supply then hu? Leave a couple hundred 700/900s in the network and push the rest to mainline.
 
I'm, that might work, but Delta doesn't have an endless supply of 717s

Uhhhhh, 319s work too. In fact a bunch are coming back into service soon from "charter" work (more on that later), and there are plenty out there to be had. Blue1 of Finland btw is looking to dump their 717s right now, so there is the first bunch to possibly be had.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top