Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

End is near.... Gojet gets 1st CRJ.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Lear70 said:
I carry the list, as do many others. THAT'S the only weapon I have in this fight, besides supporting the TSA pilots as best we can.

I need not say anymore... :eek: You've been so effective thus far. Let me be the first to extend my thanks for saving our profession... :puke:

What a joke. You're one battle behind the times.
 
h25b said:
I need not say anymore... :eek: You've been so effective thus far. Let me be the first to extend my thanks for saving our profession... :puke:

What a joke. You're one battle behind the times.

Our profession? I thought you were not an airline pilot? Stop trying to convince us that the company you work for is acceptable. You quite obviously work for gayjets.
 
Smarta$$ said:
Our profession? I thought you were not an airline pilot? Stop trying to convince us that the company you work for is acceptable. You quite obviously work for gayjets.

Must be pretty depressing to think that your last line of defense is the jumpseat war. Keep up the good work and fighting the good fight. :rolleyes:

It must be OUR profession from the looks of all of the recently aspiring corporate pilots looking to come over from the disenchanted ranks of regional jet drivers.
 
Last edited:
h25b said:
I need not say anymore... :eek: You've been so effective thus far. Let me be the first to extend my thanks for saving our profession... :puke:

What a joke. You're one battle behind the times.
And you're doing WHAT to help protect our careers from further decay and preserve and promote a better future in aviation?

Hmmm... deafening silence.

How 'bout you do us all a favor. That's right, you CAN do something to help. Since you're not going to be part of the solution, why don't you have a hot cup of STFU?

Thanks in advance,
 
Tank Commander said:
I know him, he has no other hobbies.
That's not true... ;)

I'm actually in our crew hotel in CVG right now, just bought another 3000GT in New York that needs work and I'm driving back to Nashville to fix it then sell it (couldn't stay awake any longer on that 16 hour drive).

I also buy and sell stuff on eBay (which is why I'm online a lot when I'm off work).

Why you gotta mess with your fellow 'Linker like that? :D

p.s. this hotel is kick-a*s, our overnights here are long now, it's a Hilton with those cushy feather beds, and there's like 7 restaurants within walking distance; gotta watch for these in open time.
 
Lear70 said:
And you're doing WHAT to help protect our careers from further decay and preserve and promote a better future in aviation?

Hmmm... deafening silence.

How 'bout you do us all a favor. That's right, you CAN do something to help. Since you're not going to be part of the solution, why don't you have a hot cup of STFU?

Thanks in advance,

What am I doing ???? Well, for starters when my little operation began I made sure that we got paid above industry average. That's one of the perks of NOT being an airline pilot, you actually get to name your own worth and you're not whittled down to relying upon nutless ALPA with it's legions of SCAB list carrying fools do it for you. You exemplify the problem.

Good luck with your "jumpseat protection list"....:rolleyes:
 
Lear70 said:
And you're doing WHAT to help protect our careers from further decay and preserve and promote a better future in aviation?

Hmmm... deafening silence.

How 'bout you do us all a favor. That's right, you CAN do something to help. Since you're not going to be part of the solution, why don't you have a hot cup of STFU?

Thanks in advance,

I always gotta laugh at the guys who when logic and the facts fail to support their ill conceived notions always resort to either name calling or telling someone else to shut up.
 
theo said:
I always gotta laugh at the guys who when logic and the facts fail to support their ill conceived notions always resort to either name calling or telling someone else to shut up.
Both of you have yet to provide better alternatives through your insightful "logic" you refer to.

Go ahead, we're listening...
 
Lear70 said:
Both of you have yet to provide better alternatives through your insightful "logic" you refer to.

Go ahead, we're listening...

How about recognizing that GJ's when put in its proper perspective is hardly the evil you'd like us all to believe.

Hey man, if you don't like the situation it's your right. But please don't outright LIE by saying that GJ's took planes away from TSA. You're pretty much just a BS artist. :rolleyes:
 
h25b said:
How about recognizing that GJ's when put in its proper perspective is hardly the evil you'd like us all to believe.

Hey man, if you don't like the situation it's your right. But please don't outright LIE by saying that GJ's took planes away from TSA. You're pretty much just a BS artist. :rolleyes:
To my understanding, they have. Not ALL of their aircraft, but their startup aircraft were pulled from service and transferred from what I've been told.

BS Artist? One could say that about you except that I believe you're more subtle.

You remind me of a movie called The Devil's Advocate: "This is HARDLY evil, is it? It's just such a little thing, to let one company come in and undermine another." Then it's another thing, then another, then another, until you're ready to fly Northwest mainline's 747's for $100 an hour.

Once you start down that path, how do you mark the "limit"? How do you know where to draw the line?

Your perspective MAY be different than mine, but to ASSert that your perspective is the "PROPER" perspective is egotistical at best, self-delusional at worst, especially given that the only people that seem to agree with you (for the most part) are the G0Jet pilots and management.

When you're in the minority on a belief on an issue, to assert that it's "proper" is a joke. But I shouldn't be surprised, you've taken the low road on just about every issue we've debated (this is the 3rd, you do realize).
 
*************************s

Lear70 said:
To my understanding, they have. Not ALL of their aircraft, but their startup aircraft were pulled from service and transferred from what I've been told.

BS Artist? One could say that about you except that I believe you're more subtle.

You remind me of a movie called The Devil's Advocate: "This is HARDLY evil, is it? It's just such a little thing, to let one company come in and undermine another." Then it's another thing, then another, then another, until you're ready to fly Northwest mainline's 747's for $100 an hour.

Once you start down that path, how do you mark the "limit"? How do you know where to draw the line?

Your perspective MAY be different than mine, but to ASSert that your perspective is the "PROPER" perspective is egotistical at best, self-delusional at worst, especially given that the only people that seem to agree with you (for the most part) are the G0Jet pilots and management.

When you're in the minority on a belief on an issue, to assert that it's "proper" is a joke. But I shouldn't be surprised, you've taken the low road on just about every issue we've debated (this is the 3rd, you do realize).
Ditto
 
Lear70 said:
To my understanding, they have. Not ALL of their aircraft, but their startup aircraft were pulled from service and transferred from what I've been told.

BS Artist? One could say that about you except that I believe you're more subtle.

O.K. Here we go... A bit less "subtle."

Your understanding is absolutely FALSE. NO CRJ-700 was EVER operated by TSA and then pulled from them to go over to GJ's. That's the problem I'm habving with you. At least in this case you don't know WTF you're talking about. Hence, NO aircraft were "taken" from them... PERIOD...
 
h25b said:
O.K. Here we go... A bit less "subtle."

Your understanding is absolutely FALSE. NO CRJ-700 was EVER operated by TSA and then pulled from them to go over to GJ's. That's the problem I'm habving with you. At least in this case you don't know WTF you're talking about. Hence, NO aircraft were "taken" from them... PERIOD...


Lear70, Your waisting your breath! h25b is a GAYJET pilot and will never agree with you because he is trying to convince people that he is not doing anything wrong.

h25bhomo, Just because it is a different fleet type does not mean that the growth aircraft didnt belong to TSA. You know very well that TSAH could and should have had one pilot list for both certificates like Republic.

Stop trying to convince people that your not in the wrong.
 
Smarta$$ said:
h25bhomo, Just because it is a different fleet type does not mean that the growth aircraft didnt belong to TSA. You know very well that TSAH could and should have had one pilot list for both certificates like Republic.

Stop trying to convince people that your not in the wrong.


It ain't yours until it's in your CBA. Period. Otherwise it's, "Coulda, shoulda, woulda ... "

More lamea$$ insults from the smarta$$ .... Beautiful... :cool:
 
h25b said:
It ain't yours until it's in your CBA. Period. Otherwise it's, "Coulda, shoulda, woulda ... "

More lamea$$ insults from the smarta$$ .... Beautiful... :cool:

What a great arguement. Genius.

Coulda, shouda, woulda... my dad can beat up your dad... what ever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you...

Your coulda, shouda, woulda, is pretty lame coming from a guy or girl that just said the other day that you were trying to improve OUR proffesion. Its pretty hard to say that you are trying to improve our proffesion and support Gayjets with a woulda, coulda arguement at the same time.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top