Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
spiffomatic said:that airline is a four letter word and should be censored.
Well, that's just the point. ALPA did NOT screw them.L.Skywalker said:I can hardly blame them - if ALPA screwed them, why continue with ALPA?
Lear70 said:I feel a LOT of things are wrong with ALPA, but to blame them for these things is NOT a fair place to lay blame.
They were at least expected to try to protect us. Instead they just threw up their hands and said "I know you guys have been with us since the beginning (Councils 2, 3, and 4) but so long now". Worse yet, our lawsuit contends that ALPA continued actively trying to get the APA to rejoin during the integration. From a business point of view it makes perfect sense: why care about 2300 lame-duck pilots when you can appease 10,000 potential new high-paid members? (This was pre-9/11.) You ask how ALPA was supposed to protect us? How about a major PR effort to start. You know, a mailer saying to support your brethren being taken advantage of by another union, lobbying lawmakers, newspaper ads. Those actions may only have been symbolic but at least they'd have shown some solidarity. But no, there was nary a whimper out of DW. Shameful!Lear70 said:The TWA guys FEEL they got screwed by ALPA, but how was ALPA supposed to protect the TWA guys when they were being PURCHASED by a non-ALPA pilot group?
What "problem"? The APA had a duty to represent their members and I dare say they did a very good job of it. ALPA had a duty to represent theirs, too.Lear70 said:From what I recall (and I was paying attention because I was in the TWA pool), it wasn't ALPA that had the problem, it was the APA.
DUH! That's one of our lawsuit's contentions.ALPA was stuck in a very nasty corner: they wanted the APA to switch to ALPA so they weren't about to alienate them through any negative P.R. campaign such as what you're talking about, WHEN IT WASN'T GOING TO DO ANY GOOD!!!
Um, let's see, HOW ABOUT BECAUSE IT'S THEIR JOB! Me and approximately 2299 other TWA pilots paid 1.95% of our dues and I don't think it's unreasonable to expect some effort on our behalf. Plus, we paid a $300 merger assessment which could only have been used for an ALPA-ALPA merger, but guess what -- that money sits to this day frozen in an account which ALPA won't let us near. It's OUR money.So what good would it have done ALPA to spend hundreds of thousands of $$$ on a campaign that's only END GOAL was to piss off thousands of AA pilots?
Um, I said the PR campaign was a start. Very few pilots knew exactly what was going on.Other than satisfy your symbolic peace of mind and heart.
That's nice for you, but you see there's this little thing called DFR, duty to fairly represent. It doesn't matter that it was in National ALPA's best interest to screw TWA and perform fellacio on the APA. They violated their legal and fiduciary responsibility to the TWA pilots and that's an actionable offense....but I can't fault ALPA for a sound business decision in a lose-lose scenario.
We weren't a Single Carrier yet and they still represented us. The odds were irrelevant. Plus, we tried to file an injuction preventing the imposed integration but DW yanked the lawyer out from under us. Funny, we thought the lawyer worked for our MEC but as it turned out he worked for National. That's called a conflict of interest. (And the AWA MEC isn't making the same mistake.)Lear70 said:That's the whole point: once they realized they were up against a brick wall with nowhere to go and nothing they could do would change the stance of APA, they quit.
You see, it's not just about the lowly TWAers; it's about what we can expect from our union when the going gets rough. You seem to advocate a give-up-early position and I say fight to the end.So you would have them to continue to throw hundreds of thousands of dollars away in a campaign that they KNEW was going to get them absolutely ZERO?
I didn't say it wasn't moving forward, in fact it is. I was simply illustrating how slowly complex civil litigation moves. There's been no rulings on merit. In fact, the case against the two other original defendents, APA and AA/TWA LLc was dismissed not on merit but on statute of limitations. Ozark's lawsuit against ALPA took seven years to conclude.I'm not surprised it hasn't moved forward.
Wow. I'm floored. "Retaliatory"?!!! We know the integration won't be overturned and there's no precedent for large money payouts. In other words, even if the suit is wildly successful we stand to gain very little individually. In true union fashion it's not about you or me but about all of us.It sucks, and believe me, I've been on the sucking end of several bad deals in aviation so I don't like it any more than you do, but to pursue a lawsuit of that type isn't "justice", it's simply retaliatory.
Well, if you're intention is airline management then your opinion makes perfect sense. You're obviously not an airline pilot with at least ten years in the industry. Call it a necessary evil if you wish, but pilots need a union. I'm actually an ALPA member again -- that's how necessary I think it is.Juan Trippe said:... but I believe from what i've seen that in the end they do more bad than good.
I disagree. ALPA has a fiduciary responsibility to ALL it's individual MEC's to make decisions such as this. If the odds were 1 in 1,000 or worse (which it seems to me they were), they bore a responsibility to their OTHER members to cut their losses when facing a no-win scenario.TWA Dude said:We weren't a Single Carrier yet and they still represented us. The odds were irrelevant.
Can't disagree with you there; I've told every single member who will listen to me that if they have a fight with the company that the MEC doesn't seem to get behind 110% and support, do NOT use the MEC attorney in grievance, get your own attorney and make your MEC pay their share of it (it's in the bylaws).Plus, we tried to file an injuction preventing the imposed integration but DW yanked the lawyer out from under us. Funny, we thought the lawyer worked for our MEC but as it turned out he worked for National. That's called a conflict of interest. (And the AWA MEC isn't making the same mistake.)
No, it's not. That's semantic justification.You see, it's not just about the lowly TWAers; it's about what we can expect from our union when the going gets rough.
No, I'm very much a "fight to the end" kind of person WHEN I KNOW THERE'S A HINT OF WINNING. When it's a no-win scenario, I cut my losses and move on, as much for my own peace of mind as for saving time, money, and effort.You seem to advocate a give-up-early position and I say fight to the end.
And you guys have been at this HOW long and haven't been able to take it to trial? I'm somewhat familiar with civil litigation and can tell you the longer it takes to go to trial, the lesser the odds of winning. Strong cases go to trial quickly because all the evidence is in their favor.I didn't say it wasn't moving forward, in fact it is. I was simply illustrating how slowly complex civil litigation moves. There's been no rulings on merit. In fact, the case against the two other original defendents, APA and AA/TWA LLc was dismissed not on merit but on statute of limitations. Ozark's lawsuit against ALPA took seven years to conclude.
You just described the true essence of "retaliatory".Wow. I'm floored. "Retaliatory"?!!! We know the integration won't be overturned and there's no precedent for large money payouts. In other words, even if the suit is wildly successful we stand to gain very little individually.
Well then we'll just keep disagreeing. If a union is all about letting it own out to dry then what good is it?Lear70 said:I disagree. ALPA has a fiduciary responsibility to ALL it's individual MEC's to make decisions such as this. If the odds were 1 in 1,000 or worse (which it seems to me they were), they bore a responsibility to their OTHER members to cut their losses when facing a no-win scenario.
I don't know what your "somewhat" familiarity with civil litigation is but I've done paralegal type work at my dad's law office. Complex litigation takes a long time regardless of how "strong" the case is. There have been no rulings on the "strength" of our case other than ALPA's failed Motion to Dismiss. Of course ALPA will use every delaying tactic possible and we can't afford lawyers high-powered enough to push things any faster.And you guys have been at this HOW long and haven't been able to take it to trial? I'm somewhat familiar with civil litigation and can tell you the longer it takes to go to trial, the lesser the odds of winning. Strong cases go to trial quickly because all the evidence is in their favor.
You really don't understand. Breach of responsibility is actionable. It just doesn't matter that defending us wasn't the financially smart thing to do. Unions make it hurt for their employers -- that's what it takes to defend pilots. Though the desire for revenge is natural ALPA National needs to learn what DFR means. There WILL be more mergers and if the lesson isn't taught what happened to us WILL happen again.You just described the true essence of "retaliatory".
Yes, all G0Jets aircraft have 3 classes: first class, coach class, and the cockpit is no-class.SlapShot said:A 3 class configuration??????
This falls under the YGBFSM category.cargojunkie said:I still dont understand why GJ pilots are different from MESA, SKYWEST, CHQ, republic, shuttle, PSA, its all the same.
Agreed.Lear70 said:TWA Dude, we're probably just going to have to agree to disagree.
I don't understand how you can compare a class-action DFR suit with your actions. The discovery phase alone is estimated to take a year. Your presumption that the case is dragging on due to lack of merit is false. In fact, seven years is not an uncommon time frame at all.Incidentally, I've had a run of BAD luck the last several years and have sued about 7 people and 3 businesses (without an attorney), all but one with success, so I understand how hard it can be to bring a case to trial which is why I stand by what I said. Doesn't make me a trial lawyer, but I know what the judge is looking for and know what I need to present and how to present it in order to win.
Lear70 said:G0Jet as a company is taking flying (and aircraft) that are TSA's and operating them at another company,
Whore or flamebaiter, which is it?Pilotsrule said:I'm glad to be on with G0JETS.. quick upgrade.. 1000 Turbine PIC is whats important to me...