Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DL MEC Rumor???

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Let's see give up my number for Comair Not! There are very few jobs for us, but it is still worth holding on to the number 1,060, bar a few companies. Southwest, UPS, and Fed Ex to name the few, of which two are not hiring. I refuse to give up what took me so long to get.

Maybe I have on rose colored glasses, but I am not going back to the "salt mines" again, especially if I would have to give up my seniorty number.

TK+0
 
Spanky,

Thanks for the sage advice...o' wise / experinced one
Anytime pompous egotistical jercoff.
The world is not a level playing field. Nothing personal, just fact.
I'm OK with that.
Thanks for your service to our great nation.
And I salute your sacrifice as well sir!

GL,

You asked, I will attempt to answer. Of course I would not give up my number at Delta if I were in their place.
I said it before and I repeat, It should not be that way. You're ticked off at the wrong people though. I believe that there is some degree of penis envy over there that make some in a certain MEC unable to play well with others. That does not make the entire pilot group at Comair responsible for that unfortunate policy. Ultimately that policy was handed down from on high and the folks flying the planes at Comair had no more influence on it than you or I.
Incidentally, what should the hiring policy at Comair, ASA, or any other National Airline be with regard to furloughs and whether or not they should be required to resign their number?

AMF
 
XRMEFLYER,

I wouldn't say I am upset at the "average line pilot" out there at Comair, but unfortunately they are going to be catogorized for their MEC's or management's decisions. As I said before, their full response was definitely "underwhelming." Infact, the people that represent them---their MEC---used extorsion to try to get something in return for "possible" help. What they can't see here is that 1060 pilots were caught in the middle of this--and most still don't have a flying job. Comair, in the the mean time, is hiring. Hmmmmm. It's not like these furloughs would be going to the left seat or bumping anyone---nope.

I know your position, and I am glad that you wish it would have gone differently. I wish more of your people voiced that, to the right people who "hold the keys to the Golden Rule Chest." Unfortunately, the Comair pilot group will take a hit for this sometime in the future, and the reason will be because of the lackluster effort. It's like watching something on TV and seeing starving people in Africa and turing to your wife and saying, "Heck, that isn't happening...." We at Delta can and have done a lot for our furloughs---free Cobra, sponsoring furloughs, emergency relief funds, Christmas presents, etc....But, we can't get them employed without some help. We are still trying to get them back as fast as possible, and did get 250 back so far--with more hopefully in the future. I am not giving up on TB Kane---I won't be totally happy until he is back on the line.

Bye Bye--General Lee

:rolleyes:
 
General Lee

Just curious. I use to read the posts from DAL pilots all the time, especially on the ALPA national board, and they were always saying that if Comair/ASA pilots wanted a staple, it was up to them to negotiate it with management themselves. The Delta guys made it clear that they were not going to "expend negotiating capital" on Comair or ASA.

Why is it different now? Why should the Comair pilots "expend negotiating capital" on Delta pilots? Isn't that the responsibility of the Delta pilots themselves?
 
Nindiri,

Currently we are holding up the bar on Major pay rates (which should be lowered here eventually a tad) and you guys are doing it for the regionals. I think 9-11 changed a lot of things--especially helping each other out. But, the Comair people could have easily helped our furloughed people---just like the ASA people did (pilots, management ---whoever helped our furloughs....). But, the Comair MEC wanted something in return---during a terrible time for our furloughs--who found themselves in a bad situation fast. The ASA people stepped up to the plate and saw the situation the way it really was---people NEEDING HELP.

I believe our MEC just approved and backed your possible merger between ASA/Comair--seeing that it would help save money by throwing out a lot of extra management positions and streamlining everything. We backed you---again---just like we did during your strike. And, our furloughs are still hoping to get a job while they wait to come back--and most are hoping probably for a slot at ASA or Chataqua now. Can you see the double standard that continues to go on at Comair? They might help our furloughs---for a price. And, I don't think any of our people ever minded if there would be a staple---but back when we were negotiating for our C2K contract---the DCI people thought they had "won the ALPA lottery"----date of hire seniority. They were jumping around---giddy. This was distracting during our negotiations, and in the end was shot down---but not the staple part. As far as I know---nobody was ever against a staple job---except Delta management.

Bye Bye--General Lee;)
 
---the DCI people thought they had "won the ALPA lottery"----date of hire seniority.

Easy there stallion. There you go again painting the whole group with the same brush.
That was 100% our ALPA reps who stipulated that silly date of hire thing. There was absolutely no vote of any sort from the rank and file before they went to Delta with that proposal. They(our reps) basically just told us hey"this one list thing is a go" and that was all we knew of the proposal until it was shot down in flames. If it had ever come to a vote even back then(Summer '00) It would have passed overwhelmingly as a staple. Why was there no counteroffer from your side? Could it have been that you knew the "no furlough clause" was going to be a part of your soon to be completed contract?

AMF
 
XRMEFLYER,

I doubt that. Nobody would have turned down a staple---that would have given us more people below us, and nobody knew 9-11 was coming. All I remember was flying a 767 from MCO to ATL one morning and a Delta jumpseater telling the Capt that the ASA/Comair guys wanted date of hire merge---and he said ,"Fu__ 'um, I can't believe they are trying to screw with us during our Contract talks....." A friend of mine at ASA at the time said she saw the pilots literally jumping up and down with glee when they first thought that they would get date of hire. It was ridiculous supposedly.

Overall, I would still like a staple--even with fences so that no current ASA/Comair pilot would be furloughed, and bring back ours to the bottom of your list until they are recalled---and then start fresh. I would like that---but Delta would not probably.


Bye Bye--General Lee;)
 
XRMEFLYER said:
That was 100% our ALPA reps who stipulated that silly date of hire thing.
AMF

XRMEFLYER,

You've been doing pretty good so far. There is no need to make statements that are not factual to placate General Lee. None of your ALPA reps ever stipulated any "date of hire thing". That is not true.

The General has a noble clause in seeking to defend and help his fourloughed bretheren. But instead of doing that, he actually makes matters worse, because his posts are full of untrue statements and threats. His strategy is not unlike his MEC, which is exactly why his Chairman got no special help.

The DOH garbage is a propaganda effort mounted by the Delta MEC. They used it as a tool to incite and rally their apathetic rank and file in support of C2K. There was no DOH demand ever by the Comair MEC. Period. Don't believe the Delta pilots' propaganda machine.

In the case of the hiring of their furloughed by Comair, the Delta MEC Chairman did not ask for help from the Comair MEC. He came to the MEC with a bogus offer of preferential hiring, on which he could not deliver, and a threat of "going public" if they did not do what he wanted.

He already knew that Delta management was not interested in supporting him by directing Comair management to hire his people, which it could have easily done. They turned him down, before he came to the Comair MEC. He announced, again before he came, his intention to go public if he didn't get what he wanted. I wasn't in that meeting either, but I am confident that is exactly why he was turned down, and he should have been.

Buergey is not stupid. He knew exactly what he was doing. He wanted to be turned down and he did it in a way that would guarantee just that. Just like the DOH propaganda generated by his predecessor Giambusso, he wanted a tool that would incite the Delta pilots against Comair pilots. Why? Because he and ALPA don't like the litigation against ALPA and the DMEC's predatory scope clause.

As for the General's rhetoric about how much the Delta pilots "helped" us in our time of "need", that's BS too. Yes, they paid the strike assesment. As you pointed out earlier, that was not a matter of choice, it is a mandatory requirement of ALPA membership that applies to all. Yes, they didn't fly struck work, but they did not do that because they wanted to "help us". They did it because they did not want to be branded as scabs.

Some Delta pilots did contribute to our family fund. That was voluntary and we should be thankful to those who did. However, the truth is it was dam*ed few of them and dam*ed little. The American pilots, who don't even belong to ALPA, gave far, far, more than the Delta pilots. So don't let him fill you up with the BS about their largess.

Before they got their contract, some of them walked our picket lines. The day after their own contract was a done deal, all of them disappeared.

We can't paint them all with the same brush, because there are thousands of fine and good people on the Delta list, but the majority are self-serving. By that I mean that they have a history of "helping" whenever they think it serves their own interests, and a history of doing nothing whenever it does not.

Their MEC has used its influence against the interests of Comair pilots for more than a decade. Long before the "strike" began and continuously since it has ended.

They did their dam*dest to take away ALL of our 70-seaters. They did not succeed, because the Company (Delta) would not let them. They have been trying to do that since they first learned of the order, and they have not given up. While they tell you in public how much they wanted to help and how they hoped we would win, in private they do everything in their power to take whatever they can and restrict what they cannot take.

There belief that they should have "special rights" at Comair is nothing new. It did NOT start after Delta purchased Comair. They had that same belief long before. Now that their Company "owns" our company it is merely upgraded from a right to a sacred right.

Before they ran into difficult times, the truth is they wouldn't give us the time of day. As a matter of fact one of their former MEC Chairmen even had the audacity to demand an apology from our MEC Chairman, because he requested an audience that "God" wasn't disposed to grant.

If you are not familiar with what these people who say they want to "help" us have done in the past, make an effort to learn. It will curl your hair.

They have a new MEC Chairman now and things may get better. However, once more, that is because it is in their best interest to have better relations at this time. Their current Chairman is a lot smarter than the last one, and knows that you catch more flies with honey. However, make no mistake, we are still thought of as "flies" that should be caught.

He "supported" (not approved like GL says - he has no authority to "approve" or disapprove) the proposed merger between ASA/CMR. Wow! Such a deal. A merger that is of highly questionable benefit to either ASA or Comair pilots, and of no particular danger or benefit to Delta pilots. In other words a zero-cost propaganda opportunity. Meanwhile his MEC supports the idea that we should take a pay cut (although he does not himself), because we need to "share the pain" of his pilots' excessive costs. On that, he is conveniently silent, in public.

He is also silent on the black-ball threat directed at CMR pilots that the General (and others) shout to the heavens every day. He has not retracted the threats made by his predecessor, at least not in public (and I predict that he will not)

He himself negotiated an agreement that limited our 70-seat jets and forced their distribution among all DCI carriers. He personally negotiated the limits on our 50-seat flying. His MEC is currently seeking to use our flying as a bargaining chip in his negotiations.

As long as the Delta pilots continue to "use" the future of Comair and ASA pilots as bargaining chips, you and every other CMR/ASA pilot should come to the realization that our "friends" do not reside in Atlanta.

It would indeed have been nice if furloughed Delta pilots could have found a temporary home at Comair. The responsibility for why they have not rests soley at the hands of the Delta MEC.

The General claims and loudly resents his fellow furloughed pilots are being used as what he calls "pawns". So do I, we just have a different perspective as to who is doing the using. GL thinks it is Comair pilots, I think it is the Delta MEC.

Surplus resents with equal fervor the fact that ALL Comair pilots and their futures have been used as "pawns" to further the agenda and interests of the Delta MEC for a decade. So I guess the General and I are even. If and when the Delta MEC chooses to change its politics and agenda with respect to us, I'll be more than happy to join in the call for a cease fire. Until they do, the struggle to protect our interests will probably continue.

Don't worry too much about what the General or the others write on this board, it is relatively mild. Read what they write on the ALPA board, read what they publish in The Roar and the Widget, official publications of the Delta MEC and Council 44. Go back and read what they have been saying to each other, about us, for the last ten years. Then you will know what they really think. This dispute did not begin with the currently furloughed Delta pilots. If the General or anyone else thinks that it did, they just can't see the forest for the trees.
 
There is no need to make statements that are not factual to placate General Lee
I know, but I thought I would try and make nice. I've been pretty hard on the Beaver lately.

Nobody would have turned down a staple---
Spank her would have. There are a lot of folks here who don't meet the standard you know.

AMF
 
Hey XCRMENT,
Allow me to translate from previous. Translation of "the line forms behind TK" = "staple"...and from that day on, hiring qualifications would have to be the same...if there is every hiring again...raised or lowered depending on your perspective. Anything else is something for nothing.

Your comard in arms...
 
Hey XCRMENT
Good one!
Allow me to translate from previous. Translation of "the line forms behind TK" = "staple"...and from that day on, hiring qualifications would have to be the same...if there is every hiring again...raised or lowered depending on your perspective. Anything else is something for nothing.
?
 
XCIBTINST,

Spank her would have. There are a lot of folks here who don't meet the standard you know.

Hence...my come back. "Line forms behind TK" = staple. Fast game...you have to keep up with the tour.

What is the record for longest (sts) thread?
 
Spanksalot,

I am slow it's true, but could you please humor me and explain it to us all just one more time. I promise to pay very close attention this time.

AMF
 
Let me explain it slowly for you.

No one will be put on the Delta list above me. The line forms for new hires/staples/flow through's behind me when we starting hiring again in 2020.
 
Bottom of the list, YOUCH! Maybe three thousand-plus from the bottom soon. Hopefully, there can be something that works for everyone.
 
Surplus1, well said.

701EV
 
Surplus,

Seems like this argument comes around again in cycles...

I doubt there would be such an "outcry" about Comair's furlough-hiring policy if ASA HAD THE SAME POLICY - but it doesn't... Why should ASA accept DAL furloughees and not require resignation of seniority number and Comair not accept them? Therein lies a lot of the anger related to the situation. If Comair and ASA had a UNIFORM policy, then I doubt the level of angst would be the same. As you would expect, this is a sensitive issue for everyone and there are many variables involved...

As you well know, many precedents have already been set by major airlines and how they handle their furloughed pilots... UAL furloughees follow a j4j policy (and its partners are not even wholly-owned), Continental furloughees migrate down to COEX and take Captain positions, USAirways has a j4j policy with its wholly-owned subsidiaries. And yet, furloughed DAL pilots can't even get the lowest FO positions (bottom seniority) with a wholly-owned subsidiary... Catch my drift? If your own position would not even be impacted (given that any furloughees would be the lowest seniority), why would you care so much?

I am not a Delta employee, but a lot of my Delta friends can't seem to understand this point. ASA accepts furloughee pilots with no restrictions, Comair doesn't. Both ASA and Comair are owned by Delta - sister companies. Why the difference? That's the point...

This argument will go on forever I am sure (and the General will continue to defend the furloughees)...
 
Last edited:
Heavy Set:

Have you ever heard of "Whipsaw"

Delta Management is loving the angst that they caused by not making the policy the same at ASA and CMR. They want the three groups to be as angry as possible at each other instead of themselves.

And, of course, we are our own worst enemy as well.
 
Surplus1

That was a very informative and accurate post. You points and proof is right on. But you did forget one thing, during the CMR Strike DALPA guys did not fly struck work, but they did increase aircraft size and frequency. Can ya feel the love, can ya?


General and TBKane,

I feel for you General because I do fully believe you see the world as a double-breasted owned world. If your MEC has any power or stones why can they not put pressure on Delta (Reid) to have guys go to CMR? What makes you think that 1500 lowly “Regional” pilots have any more pull that 6000 “Major” pilots? The answer is they DOESN’T have the ability any more than you. Delta wants whip-saw and anger among the pilots so they can bend every one of you over and have you ALL work for McDonald wages. (hirer than pre-strike CMR new hire wage) So drop the us vs. them stuff, that’s for both sides to work collectively. Will it happen? No, because pilots are the best at looking out for number one (themselves).

I find it interesting that DALPA stands firm that the companies are all different, but the same when it benefits them. My answer is one list. A CMR-ASA merger based on DOH and with a staple below the last displaced Delta pilot. With Delta furloughs taking new-hire status at DCI (ASA-CMR) until recall. Its not perfect but it seems the most rational as I smoke my crack pipe waiting for rational thought to form at Delta et al.
 
Last edited:
surplus1, I want to correct a couple of errors in your account. John Malone was indeed the negotiator who negotiated limits on the 70 seatsers. But, no where in the DAL contract does it state that they have to be spread out among all DCI carriers. DCI is allowed 57 70 seates. They can all go to one airline, or they can be spread out. Delta decides who gets em and how they are distributed. No one from the DAL MEC ever forced Delta to spread them around, they did not care.

Also, while it is true no one from the MECs of CMR or ASA ever asked for DOH, many individual pilots from CMR and ASA were out flying jumpseats, or whereever, saying they wanted DOH or they would sue. I heard it myself. The DAL never once said that the ASA/CMR MECs wante DOH. They did however, acccurately point out that if the ASA and CMR pilots could not agree with the DAL pilot on how to integrate, it would ultimately be decided by an arbitrator. It is very unlikely that an arbitrator would have given DOH, but he could have, and that was the whole point.
 
Why is OK that Continental furloughees can get Captain slots at COEX while Delta furloughees can't even get lowest-seniority FO slots at both of its wholly-owned regionals (and not impact anyone senior to them)? Sure, they are two different companies, but the CONCEPT should be acceptable - right? Instead, the Delta furloughees, many of whom have been out of work since 9/11, are pawns in a political game...

How is it that ASA can have one policy and Comair another - and yet both are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Delta? It really doesn't make much sense...
 
Heavy Set said:
Why is OK that Continental furloughees can get Captain slots at COEX while Delta furloughees can't even get lowest-seniority FO slots at both of its wholly-owned regionals (and not impact anyone senior to them)? Sure, they are two different companies, but the CONCEPT should be acceptable - right? Instead, the Delta furloughees, many of whom have been out of work since 9/11, are pawns in a political game...

How is it that ASA can have one policy and Comair another - and yet both are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Delta? It really doesn't make much sense...

I can answer your first question. Because COEX has a flow-thru agreement with CO. DAL has no such agreement with ASA or Comair.

Your DAL furloughed pilots can and do get some FO slots at ASA, provided they can pass the interview (some can't).

I don't know why Comair won't hire furloughed DAL pilots. It doesn't make sense to me.
 
Heavy Set said:
Why is OK that Continental furloughees can get Captain slots at COEX while Delta furloughees can't even get lowest-seniority FO slots at both of its wholly-owned regionals (and not impact anyone senior to them)? Sure, they are two different companies, but the CONCEPT should be acceptable - right? Instead, the Delta furloughees, many of whom have been out of work since 9/11, are pawns in a political game...



You do know that Continental and AA were giving mainline seniority numbers to RJ captains right?? That was the trade off. (I know its a lot more, but that is a HUGE reason) It's a two way street.

The concept mainline Delta came up with was "Lets not hurt our military buds in their bid for mainline jobs". You may be pawns now but your union made this call when they thought you were in the driver's seat. Now you have to live with the consequences.

I do feel sorry for the occasional Delta furloughee that wants to move on and can't get hired anywhere because of it. Having Delta furloughee on your resume limits your aviation options big time. But most Delta furloughees I've met are happily pursuing other interests, smug in the knowledge they have the "Best" airline job in the world to go back to. Which guy are you?

Before flaming, realize I have no axe to grind. Just observing.
 
Last edited:
Genral,

I heard that APA cut $70000 check to Comair's family fund, but all the got from you was $2200, any truth to that?
 
Heavy Set said:
Surplus,

Seems like this argument comes around again in cycles...

I doubt there would be such an "outcry" about Comair's furlough-hiring policy if ASA HAD THE SAME POLICY - but it doesn't... Why should ASA accept DAL furloughees and not require resignation of seniority number and Comair not accept them? Therein lies a lot of the anger related to the situation. If Comair and ASA had a UNIFORM policy, then I doubt the level of angst would be the same. As you would expect, this is a sensitive issue for everyone and there are many variables involved...

I am no expert on ASA policies. However if you want to know "WHY" there is a difference in this particular policy, I can offer an opinion and some history. Do with it whatever you choose.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. has chosen to permit the respective operating management of ASA and Comair to set certain of their own policies. Whom to hire happens to be one of them.

If ASA had a policy requiring the resignation of seniority at other airlines as a precondition of employment, then ASA management changed the policy to accomodate furloughed Delta pilots (ASA pilots had nothing whatever to do with that change, they merely did not oppose it.) After ASA was acquired by Delta, their previous management was replaced, with long term Delta employees filling those positions. So, the current ASA management are all really Delta people. Delta people changed their policy to accommodate Delta people.

Comair's hiring policy regarding seniority resignation was established long before Comair was acquired by Delta. At first, there was no such policy. Then EAL went on strike. At the request of the Comair union, the company agreed to hire unemployed Eastern pilots. A substantial number applied and were hired. At the very first opportunity, the majority (not all) left without notice to accept positions at such nondiscript carriers as Braniff 2, and Midway Airlines (the old Midway) leaving us high and dry. In response management implemented the policy. It had no effect on situations such as the EAL scenario, but it did block the hiring of furloughed pilots from other airlines, unless they chose to resign their prior seniority. That policy remains in place today.

After the acquisition by Delta, Comair management was not replaced, it was retained. There are no old time Delta employees running Comair. Therefore the people that are running Comair have no sense whatever of any special obligation or loyalty to Delta pilots. Delta pilots are not viewed as their "former bretheren". Comair management is naturally silent on the subject of disputes between Delta and Comair pilots, but that doesn't mean that they are unaware of the treatment Comair pilots have received at the hand of the Delta MEC.

Delta pilots maintain that Comair is a "separate" company and we are NOT employees of Delta Air Lines. Therefore if follows that Delta is a "separate" company and Delta pilots are not entitled to any special privileges at Comair by virtue of their employment at Delta. Comair management is naturally and logically interested in the welfare of the the Company they manage and that comes way ahead of the interests of Delta pilots. Hiring 600 Delta pilots that already despise Comair and wish it did not exist, all of whom would leave the next day if they could is, plain and simple bad business. Therefore, Comair management is not going to change its policy unless directed to do so by senior Delta management. This Comair pilot sees no reason why they should.

This CMR pilot supports the decision of his MEC not to intervene. There is no reason why we should submit to threats that come in the same breath as alleged requests for assistance and coupled with "promises" that obviously cannot be honored. Especially so when the source is a group of people that have demonstrated, repeatedly, that they "hate our guts" and want nothing to do with us. They've been telling us that and showing us that, both with words and actions for ten (10) years. Why should we bend over backward for them, because they think we should?

As you well know, many precedents have already been set by major airlines and how they handle their furloughed pilots... UAL furloughees follow a j4j policy (and its partners are not even wholly-owned), Continental furloughees migrate down to COEX and take Captain positions, USAirways has a j4j policy with its wholly-owned subsidiaries. And yet, furloughed DAL pilots can't even get the lowest FO positions (bottom seniority) with a wholly-owned subsidiary... Catch my drift? If your own position would not even be impacted (given that any furloughees would be the lowest seniority), why would you care so much?

You should know, if you don't, that what you call the "precedent" of J4J set by USAirways and imposed by ALPA on the USAG regional subsidiaries and subcontractors, will not ever be recognized as ligitimate by Comair pilots and will not be imposed upon us by ALPA or anyone else. No such "precedent" will ever set foot on this property. Comair pilots will not sell their seniority to the pilots of another airline for any promise of growth, nor will we ever permit the pilots of another airline to acquire super seniority at our airline through any such scheme as J4J.

Comair pilots will not allow the pilots of another airline to take 50%, 10% or 1/2 of 1% of our Captain vacancies from CMR First Officers. We will not bow to pressure from ALPA, and if the Company or its parent should attempt that, we will use all legal means to defend the seniority guaranteed by our contract. "J4J" is a dirty word on this property.

The "arrangement" between CAL and COEX is the result of a "flow-through" protocol to which they both agreed. That was their choice.

Comair pilots have repeatedly indicated that they have no interest in that type of an agreement, with anyone.
A flow through agreement that puts 1 Comair pilot on the bottom of another list, for every 3 pilots employed by the other carrier, (and requiring "interviews" to flow up) and then gives ALL of that carrier's pilots the right to flow back to the top of the Comair list is not acceptable.
That type of agreement benefits the senior pilots (at Comair) at the expense of the junior pilots, and that dog won't hunt.

If we flow up to the bottom there can be no ratio with folks hired off the street and no "interviews". Additionally, the flow back must be to the bottom. Bottom-to-bottom, one-for-one. Anything else simply makes our junior pilots furlough fodder for the other group. It makes no sense to us. We have no problem with the choice of the CAL/COEX group, it's just "different strokes for different folks."

The UAL J4J is very different from the USAG program. However, there are problems with that too. Namely, it provides for higher pay for First Officers that come from UAL. Our contract does not permit a newly hired pilot to receive higher pay for the same position held by his senior. Comair's senior pilots have an obligation to protect the interests of Comair's junior pilots that is no less than their own. I believe that we will continue to do that as we have in the past. If the "higher pay" component of the UAL procedure were not there, it is possible that such a deal might be doable. However, do not expect us to accept some "deal" negotiated by an external pilot group, with an external company, without our consent, in violation of our contract. For something like the UAL deal to work at Comair, it would first have to be agreed between our two MEC's before it could be agreed with our Company. Otherwise, it will be rejected.

What I am trying to tell you can perhaps be stated in more simple terms: We do not accept any "precedents" established by the court of biased bargaining. There is no reason under the sun why a pilot from another airline should receive higher pay than our own pilots. That is absurd in the extreme.

I am not a Delta employee, but a lot of my Delta friends can't seem to understand this point. ASA accepts furloughee pilots with no restrictions, Comair doesn't. Both ASA and Comair are owned by Delta - sister companies. Why the difference? That's the point...

I know that you are not a Delta pilot. Perhaps I am wrong, but I think your "friends" at Delta understand very well, they just will not admit it. They have made themselves believe that they have "rights" at Comair that are different from other pilots at other airlines. What is more, they also believe they are entitled to such rights. Comair pilots do not share that view.

Your Delta "friends" seek to have Comair pilots consider their interests when it is convenient for them. In those circumstances we become their "brothers". At the same time when it is not convenient for them, we are regarded as interlopers that need to be expunged before we tarnish their family. Tell your friends that either we are separate or we are not separate. They can't have it both ways. They're smart folks, they can understand that. If they choose not to, well they'll have to deal with it. They made the bed.

This argument will go on forever I am sure (and the General will continue to defend the furloughees)...

I support the General in his defense of the furloughees. That's a great thing to do. What I disagree with is his method. Good landing seldom result from bad approaches. Threats of black-balling Comair pilots will do nothing to help the furloughed pilots. That only serves to widen the chasm.

We need to work together to accomplish whatever we jointly decide is in our mutual best interest. Unilateral posturing will not produce progress.
 
michael707767 said:
surplus1, I want to correct a couple of errors in your account. John Malone was indeed the negotiator who negotiated limits on the 70 seatsers. But, no where in the DAL contract does it state that they have to be spread out among all DCI carriers. DCI is allowed 57 70 seates. They can all go to one airline, or they can be spread out. Delta decides who gets em and how they are distributed. No one from the DAL MEC ever forced Delta to spread them around, they did not care.

With all due respect you are saying exactly what I said. In this case there was no error on my part.

Granted your contract does not say that they "have to be spread" in those words. It "permits" a total of 57 70-seaters for all DCI carriers of which there are 5. They can indeed go all to one or be spread among them. Your contract encourages the parent corporation to whipsaw the connection carriers for the 70-seat equipment. Were you deliberately attempting to put a wedge between ASA and Comair pilots or was it just an "accidental coincidence"?

You are unhappily alleging that the Company already whipsaws us against you by giving us "your flying" (which in fact is not yours at all), yet you intentionally create a scenario that invites them to whipsaw us (DCI) against each other. With friends like that, who needs enemies?

Sorry, I should remember what you said and take you at your word "they (DMEC) did not care".

Additionally, you ignore the fact that Comair itself had orders and options for ninety (90) 70-seaters by itself, before Delta bought Comair. Thanks to your "contract", we lose no less than 33 and no more than ALL of those aircraft. Do you expect us to consider that a favor?

Your contract, illegally negotiated by ALPA, has deprived Comair pilots of no less than 330 promotions and potentially as many as 900 promotions, costing us literally millions of dollars in lost income over the life of our carreers at Comair. There will be no "thank you's" for what you and ALPA have done until it is undone.

Also, while it is true no one from the MECs of CMR or ASA ever asked for DOH, many individual pilots from CMR and ASA were out flying jumpseats, or whereever, saying they wanted DOH or they would sue. I heard it myself. The DAL never once said that the ASA/CMR MECs wante DOH. They did however, acccurately point out that if the ASA and CMR pilots could not agree with the DAL pilot on how to integrate, it would ultimately be decided by an arbitrator. It is very unlikely that an arbitrator would have given DOH, but he could have, and that was the whole point.

The gentleman to whom I responded said that his "ALPA reps" had asked for DOH. They did not. I am sure that there were a few, I don't know the number exactly but I do know it was very small minority, who made stupid statements about DOH. Certainly not more than a handful at Comair, who fall into the a$$hole category.

Yes, if we could not agree it would have gone to arbitration. That happens to be ALPA Merger Policy, to which all ALPA airlines have allegedly agreed. It develops however that the Merger Policy does not apply to regional carriers and that some people in ALPA, i.e., the Delta MEC, believe that it should not.

That stance of descrimination is confirmed in the Delta PWA by a provision that specifically exempts a regional carrier from the merger clause of your PWA. The prejudice is patently overt and ALPA, maker of the contract, openly supports the apartheid.

The idea that an arbitrator "might" or "could" have awarded DOH to ASA/CMR pilots in an intergration of seniority with Delta, is absurd in the extreme and you all know very well that it is.

The granting of such an arbitration award would clearly violate the Merger Policy which speciffically prohibits a windfall at the expense of either party to a merger of any kind. DOH seniority integration of ASA/CMR w/DAL would be a windfall of such magnitude as to render such an award not only improbable, but impossible.

If challenged, and it most certainly would be, such a blatant violation of the Merger Policy by any arbitrator would not stand for a day. Even if it somehow did, it could be rendered moot by a withdrawal of the mainline carrier from the union.

It is not DOH integration that you feared. What you feared was the possibility that even one regional pilot might come out senior to one Delta pilot. To avoid that you would eagerly place a captain with 25 years of seniority below a first office with six months longevity. You couldn't tolerate even the thought of that, so you used your power in the union to block an obviously applicable Merger Policy that, ironically, was principally authored (in its current and deliberately neutered format) by the DMEC.

The crafting of that policy change (made in 1998) coupled with the simultaneous neutering ot the Alter Ego Policy was no accident. I charge openly that it was specifically done in that manner with the intent of precluding a possible merger between a "regional" carrier and a "mainline" carrier.

The people that promoted those policy changes knew very well that the CBA's of every mainline carrier included provisions that would force a merger in the event another mainline carrier was acquired. That those same mainline CBA's did not specifically prohibt such a merger and therefore contained a loophole that would permit a regional to launch a PID request and get it was not lost on the leaders of our ignoble institution. To avoid that possibility, the Merger Policy was altered deliberately so that only the mainline dominated Executive Council could ever determine the applicability of the policy itself.

Claiming that there was "insufficient operational integration" between the carriers in question is almost as rediculous as your alleged fear of an unfavorable DOH integration award, and you know that too.

Well, they got what they wanted.
 
Surplus 1,

I appreciate your passion and your dedication to protecting Comair pilots rights. I really do. You articulate your points very well. That being said, how can you be sure that your statements represent the views of most Comair pilots?

I have had candid conversations with Comair pilots (many of whom were junior) who would absolutely disagree with you and welcomed Delta furloughees to the VERY BOTTOM of the seniority list. They viewed positive relations with Delta pilots as preferrable to creating a further rift and using the furloughees as bargaining chips. It is my impression that many Comair pilots would be interested in joining DAL in the long-term (whenever they start hiring off the street again - probably 2010 or so) and wanted that option to exist for them. Speaking with my Delta buddies, this is still a very sore issue and will likely continue to be so - although ASA seems to be viewed in a much more positive light because of their willingness to help DAL furloughees in their time of need.

Now, I do not know if the hiring practices will be impacted by this rift - I am not a part of the process and never will be. I have no idea what will happen. It is clear that this entire issue is very contentious and both sides appear unwilling to compromise. The idea of "one list" has been discussed over-and-over. DAL management would never go for it because it would decrease its bargaining power - it seems very unlikely to ever happen...

That being said, it is my hope that the Comair position is not being driven by a small group of power-hungry, bitter, super-senior Comair pilots at the expense of a much larger group of junior pilots who may well disagree with their position and actually welcome Delta furloughees at the very bottom of the seniority list...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom