shooter
Call me the Tumblin' Dice
- Joined
- May 13, 2006
- Posts
- 7,941
I would also point out that the Superman of this whole hearing was an attorney by the name of Samuel Simon that was called upon to testify by the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. As an attorney from an independent organization called the American Antitrust Institute that clearly stated on the record they are not siding with either party and represents that the laws of our country are upheld in the area of antitrust. He clearly states there are not minor, but possible major antitrust violations in this arrangement and the best course of action would be to stop it before irrevocable harm would come to the DHL operation to the point it would not be able to compete. And since the Department of Justice cannot intervene until a contract is in place and progress is made toward the arrangement, an injunction should be issued by non other than the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the agreement the two (DHL and UPS) are going to have. You can read his written testimony on their web site or on the House Committee web site.
I only wish his question and answers were published as well. This guy was an amazing bank of antitrust information and his stance, which represents the AAI is clear; That this deal should go no farther and stopped right away.
Not that it matters, but if anyone (or their kids) has gone to Rutgers this guy is also a part-time law professor there.
I only wish his question and answers were published as well. This guy was an amazing bank of antitrust information and his stance, which represents the AAI is clear; That this deal should go no farther and stopped right away.
Not that it matters, but if anyone (or their kids) has gone to Rutgers this guy is also a part-time law professor there.
Last edited: