Rough67
5 t's
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Posts
- 248
PS...wouldn't you guys rather park those old crappy dinosaurs and fly a E-175/190? STATE OF THE ART....no round dials. WOW[/QUOTE]
no way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My hope is that mainline will fly these hypothetical replacements!
My hope is that mainline will fly these hypothetical replacements!
I would think because the 9's are owned free and clear the over head burden makes them a reasonable airplane to operate. Fly it 5 hours a day with no pressure to get 14 hours of use every day. At least that was the content of a 2002 AW article.Wouldn't the E-190 be a considered an economical replacement of the DC9-50 series and the Bombardier CS-300 for the MD-80? Of course the main driver of the timing for replacement of these fleets will be the cost of energy going forward.
Tomct,
A national seniority list would be great, but the problem is not all company's hiring practices are the same and it would cause a flow from one company to another. In theory this would only work if they re-regulated the industry.
JP
Jo, I am not sure you would have people leaving any list after they were hired say at "Delta Connection," because they would never have to interview again and they would eventually flow up to mainline. I see what you are saying about "different hiring practices," but lets be honest here...that is only for some companies who try and say that THEY are the Best. Like I said, it would take sacrifice by all involved, but in the end, it would be better for everyone.
Hi!
The E-170/-195 is WAY too small to replace the -9-50s. They are the Bombardier large "C" size. Bombardier is rumoured to be looking into a larger "C" that WOULD compete with the later models of 737/Airbus-321 and the MDs.
NWA was planing to buy the "C" to replace the -9s. DAL was also looking at it.
cliff
NBO