Continental Airlines Chooses Not to Merge

[Flopgut]

Just a theory.

Just why would CAL expend so much time and energy and money to put together a deal with United and then pull out when we thought the deal was closed?

Perhaps it sounds reminiscent of Delta's initial refusal to consider a merger with Northwest. When Northwest first made ovations to consolidate with DAL, Delta said very publicly that they would be better off as stand lone carrier. But as we all know a deal was finally struck...even a deal with those pesky pilots.

Now it seems Continental is just trying to sweeten the deal for themselves. They bait the hook and Glenn, being the stupid trout that he is, bit down hard. Then it comes time to sign on the dotted line and CAL changes their mind. Hmmm...

Let's not forget where Continental came from. This is a very familiar Lorenzo tactic. That is to say; Strike a great deal, get ready to shake hands and then change your mind because you can always ask for more. Continental is not going to let us into their pants unless we promise to marry them and buy them a big house. That means we give up a lot. And since Glenn can't play poker without showing his hand to everyone at the table, CAL thinks we have more to give. They are certianly not wrong about this.

The panic now showing among our employee groups is just what Continental wants to see. We are desperate and they think that our only other choice is USAir. Which of course, would be like marrying Brittany Spears. We get scared. Investors get scared and the bankers get pissed. Collective pressure is now put on Glenn and our union to soften our position to get a Continental deal done...since USAir will mean a quick (but painful) death.

Glenn has shown his cards and his rather well compensated ass to everyone. Continental is just going to prove that it is all too easy to fleece a moron. In fact, they can probably be excused for disbelieving their own luck.

I'm going to call BS here. This is no different than when CAL was between NWA and DAL 10 years ago. DAL had that eliteist-a$$monkey-Harvard-tool who thought he was better than anyone else running an airline and Bethune gave him the biggest corporate bitchslap of his career by going with NWA (at the last second)!! Equally elietist Tilton just got the same and it's got nothing to do with UAL employeses. Nobody at my airline is walking around with "screwUAL" pins on.

Bethune gave you guys a hard time back in the day, but compare that to what every UAL employee carried on like back in Denver??? CAL has been entirely civil.

 

[SuperFLUF]

Man Pokehole, you sure are clueless. Guess that's what happens when you choose to stay stuck at the commuters

I think the one is the result of the other.

Clueless = unable to progress in career

 

[SuperFLUF]

......That the 'merger' didn't occur is startling and would lead one to think that the strategic marketing alliance with AMR is in the offing.

I would like someone's insight on the AMR/CAL alliance; specifically how this helps either party very much. It would seem to me the two carriers overlap each other a great deal, and neither helps with the pacific shortcomings of both carriers......

The recurring theme from CAL management is that we need to be a first tier player in one of the three global alliances in order to retain our corporate business.

I think the talks with "AMR" are more about One World and the reach of BA than what we get out of it from AMR. Certainly, we can't reject UAL and expect to become a player in the Star Alliance.

As far as Pacific (read: China) expansion, the 787 deliveries are intended for this. Perhaps, management has concluded that we are better off with the risk of being marginalized waiting for these aircraft to come than the risks of merging with UAL.

I hope this is good news for the UAL pilots. Hopefully the street will clamor for Tilton's (& crew) ouster as his dismal 1Q results are most likely the main reason for this "dream team" merger to fall through.

For those who think this announcement is just posturing and negotiating tactics with UAL, I highly doubt it. If CAL management hadn't been proclaiming their preference to go it alone ever since Gordo left, maybe I'd believe it. But the truth is they do want to remain independent if possible and UAL's 1Q results and current state of affairs are just the thing management needed to convince the boys on the board that merging with UAL is not the way to go right now.

 

[CALDC9]

I'm going to call BS here. This is no different than when CAL was between NWA and DAL 10 years ago. DAL had that eliteist-a$$monkey-Harvard-tool who thought he was better than anyone else running an airline and Bethune gave him the biggest corporate bitchslap of his career by going with NWA (at the last second)!! Equally elietist Tilton just got the same and it's got nothing to do with UAL employeses. Nobody at my airline is walking around with "screwUAL" pins on.

Bethune gave you guys a hard time back in the day, but compare that to what every UAL employee carried on like back in Denver??? CAL has been entirely civil.

Lets go back to that Super Bowl Sunday evening. It was not Gordo who killed the deal. Bob Wilson IACP president then made the call to the board, told them the pilots were shutting CAL down Monday morning(only time in CAL history all pilots were together) if they went with the DAL deal. Gordo was out of a job if DAL bought us. Publicly he claimed he saved the employees(all BS, I was there!)
CAL pilots ate a lot of ******************** sandwiches in the late 80's & early 90's.
:erm:

 

[Correcting]

Even if/when Tilton decides to leave UAL, he's just going to end up running and ruining someone else's airline. He may even end up at CAL before it's all over.

 

[Flopgut]

Point taken. I was there too, I am sure that what IACP did was part of the equation, or in fact the tipping point. I think it's entirely appropriate as well to point out to these UAL types that CAL did not do this recent deal just to screw UAL employees. We aren't running around as an employee group with stickers, pins and all other manner of schwag calling for the end their airline.

 

[Continental]

Larry K. says that CAL isn't going to merge, so I bet that is because CAL is going to be acquired by American. Ouch.

At least with United the CAL pilots had a chance to get a good deal out of it. With American, I think they will probably gobble CAL up.

But maybe that's just me. LOL

I think you should be more worried about your own job. Because on June 28, 2008, a notice to withdraw 51 of the existing 205 Covered Aircraft from the current CPA, beginning in December 2009. Also CAL will not extend the term of the current CPA and it will expire on December 31, 2010, all aircraft would be removed from the current CPA by the end of 2012.

That is if you don't get bought by Skywest...
Whats that they say about Karma?

 

[AWACoff]

Don't forget about the United T.O.R.Q.U.E. campaign which was directed at Continental. I wonder how many of UAL pilots from those days are still around. I bet a lot of them are. This must sting worse than an ol' Dutch Rub.

 

[Flopgut]

Don't forget about the United T.O.R.Q.U.E. campaign which was directed at Continental. I wonder how many of UAL pilots from those days are still around. I bet a lot of them are. This must sting worse than an ol' Dutch Rub.

We've got plenty of old Frontier pilots here at CAL and you better believe they remember what UAL ALPA did to them!

What UAL pilots need to do is take a page from what CALDC9 is talking about. Go directly to the BOD in some way and tell them to get rid of Tilton. The BOD has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, not Tilton. UAL stock drops again? UAL pilots need to get busy!

I'm kind of surprised at the UAL ALPA reaction here. CAL/UAL wasn't that great a deal, was it? I mean, merger + 1 nanno second and UAL ALPA would have wanted to fence CAL pilots off most of the widebodies!! One year after the merger the story would have been: UAL saved CAL. So why be fussy now? I don't know what's going to happen, Kellner may have screwed up, but I think there's a lesson here: Pilot groups need to be up front with each other and take the good with the bad. (hint: USAir DAL)

 

[CAL EWR B737]

Lets go back to that Super Bowl Sunday evening. It was not Gordo who killed the deal. Bob Wilson IACP president then made the call to the board, told them the pilots were shutting CAL down Monday morning(only time in CAL history all pilots were together) if they went with the DAL deal. Gordo was out of a job if DAL bought us. Publicly he claimed he saved the employees(all BS, I was there!)
CAL pilots ate a lot of ******************** sandwiches in the late 80's & early 90's.
:erm:

Len Nickoli was the IACP President not Bob Wilson.

 

[Andy]

Don't forget about the United T.O.R.Q.U.E. campaign which was directed at Continental. I wonder how many of UAL pilots from those days are still around. I bet a lot of them are. This must sting worse than an ol' Dutch Rub.

~1500.

And American pilots were recruiting new customers from United at O'Hare in the 03/04 timeframe.

 

[CALDC9]

Len Nickoli was the IACP President not Bob Wilson.

Good memory! Bob Wilson #2, then Nickoli #3. Story remains the same. Now for the big test, can you recall all the CAL presidents?

 

[T-Bags]

We've got plenty of old Frontier pilots here at CAL and you better believe they remember what UAL ALPA did to them!

What UAL pilots need to do is take a page from what CALDC9 is talking about. Go directly to the BOD in some way and tell them to get rid of Tilton. The BOD has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, not Tilton. UAL stock drops again? UAL pilots need to get busy!

I'm kind of surprised at the UAL ALPA reaction here. CAL/UAL wasn't that great a deal, was it? I mean, merger + 1 nanno second and UAL ALPA would have wanted to fence CAL pilots off most of the widebodies!! One year after the merger the story would have been: UAL saved CAL. So why be fussy now? I don't know what's going to happen, Kellner may have screwed up, but I think there's a lesson here: Pilot groups need to be up front with each other and take the good with the bad. (hint: USAir DAL)

Honestly, the CAL hookup would have been the best deal for BOTH groups. It's all about perspective though. I've never understood the battered wife syndrome at CAL. Had a DAL deal gone through, you'd probably had much higher total earnings over the last 15 years. Instead you "went it alone" as NWA's b1tch with really slow hiring in the the 90's and a pathetic contract. Take away the last 4 years and frankly, you would have done better just about anywhere else.

As to the FRNT deal, there are two sides to the story, and the UAL ALPA story is MUCH different. IIRC, the deal breaker was that UAL ALPA demanded that the FRNT guys be on the UAL seniority list, being paid UAL payrates, while the company wanted to operate them separately at much lower rates.

Why do I think the CAL would would have been good? You'd have seen 747-400s flying out of EWR to the pacific, and widebodies to most of the international destinations. I really don't think you would have seen the fences you feared. Heck, 777's and 747's have the same payrate. I think the UAL attitude on seniority is to do it once and do it right and after that, you fly what you can hold.

Now for the kicker, and this rumor was out BEFORE you got your letter...It has been reported that one of the big reasons the merger didn't happen is that CAL was unwilling to pay the pilots the new contract rates and equity the deal would have required..."stand by your man...."

 

[pkober]

LOL. This is funny. We may be toast. Maybe not. Either way is fine with me. But this sounds like 03 all over again. Many assume CAL doesn't want to merge because of UALs books. It could be that they didn't want to merge under the terms presented. But hey, UAL might suck but you CAL guys don't walk around acting like you're SWA, FDX, and UPS rolled into one now. The whole industry sucks. That would include your place too. Good luck and congrats on having management that has wanted to run an airline for the past few.

Mr. Happy !!!

 

[Ex737Driver]

Honestly, the CAL hookup would have been the best deal for BOTH groups. It's all about perspective though. I've never understood the battered wife syndrome at CAL. Had a DAL deal gone through, you'd probably had much higher total earnings over the last 15 years. Instead you "went it alone" as NWA's b1tch with really slow hiring in the the 90's and a pathetic contract. Take away the last 4 years and frankly, you would have done better just about anywhere else.

As to the FRNT deal, there are two sides to the story, and the UAL ALPA story is MUCH different. IIRC, the deal breaker was that UAL ALPA demanded that the FRNT guys be on the UAL seniority list, being paid UAL payrates, while the company wanted to operate them separately at much lower rates.

Why do I think the CAL would would have been good? You'd have seen 747-400s flying out of EWR to the pacific, and widebodies to most of the international destinations. I really don't think you would have seen the fences you feared. Heck, 777's and 747's have the same payrate. I think the UAL attitude on seniority is to do it once and do it right and after that, you fly what you can hold.

Now for the kicker, and this rumor was out BEFORE you got your letter...It has been reported that one of the big reasons the merger didn't happen is that CAL was unwilling to pay the pilots the new contract rates and equity the deal would have required..."stand by your man...."

Were you just born a complete fcuking moron or did you just kinda grow into it?

 

[Pocono Pilot]

Now for the kicker, and this rumor was out BEFORE you got your letter...It has been reported that one of the big reasons the merger didn't happen is that CAL was unwilling to pay the pilots the new contract rates and equity the deal would have required..."stand by your man...."

You got that right. CAL pilots are the most underpaid in the industry besides Mesa maybe. That's why I turned them down. I couldn't lower myself to working for no insurance for a year either.

I have to say that I really do think that CAL pilots are probably screwed for the next few years or probably even longer. Maybe they won't be stapled to the bottom, but they will be working under a crappy contract and no work rules besides FARs.

But at least we got rid of the flowback to Express. LOL

 

[ATRCA]

Honestly, the CAL hookup would have been the best deal for BOTH groups. It's all about perspective though. I've never understood the battered wife syndrome at CAL. Had a DAL deal gone through, you'd probably had much higher total earnings over the last 15 years. Instead you "went it alone" as NWA's b1tch with really slow hiring in the the 90's and a pathetic contract. Take away the last 4 years and frankly, you would have done better just about anywhere else.

As to the FRNT deal, there are two sides to the story, and the UAL ALPA story is MUCH different. IIRC, the deal breaker was that UAL ALPA demanded that the FRNT guys be on the UAL seniority list, being paid UAL payrates, while the company wanted to operate them separately at much lower rates.

Why do I think the CAL would would have been good? You'd have seen 747-400s flying out of EWR to the pacific, and widebodies to most of the international destinations. I really don't think you would have seen the fences you feared. Heck, 777's and 747's have the same payrate. I think the UAL attitude on seniority is to do it once and do it right and after that, you fly what you can hold.

Now for the kicker, and this rumor was out BEFORE you got your letter...It has been reported that one of the big reasons the merger didn't happen is that CAL was unwilling to pay the pilots the new contract rates and equity the deal would have required..."stand by your man...."

Yeah, you're right. They decision not to merge probably had nothing to do with UAL financials and was simply a "pilot pay" issue.

Sound even a little reasonable?

Come on, you can do better than that.

 

[Pocono Pilot]

I think you should be more worried about your own job. Because on June 28, 2008, a notice to withdraw 51 of the existing 205 Covered Aircraft from the current CPA, beginning in December 2009. Also CAL will not extend the term of the current CPA and it will expire on December 31, 2010, all aircraft would be removed from the current CPA by the end of 2012.

That is if you don't get bought by Skywest...
Whats that they say about Karma?

I wouldn't worry too much about us. We have been trying to get rid of the CAL anchor forever. Just wait until Mesa goes out of business and XJT picks it all up from United. I bet we keep the 51 planes. You'll see.

 

[BigMeat]

Honestly, the CAL hookup would have been the best deal for BOTH groups. It's all about perspective though. I've never understood the battered wife syndrome at CAL. Had a DAL deal gone through, you'd probably had much higher total earnings over the last 15 years. Instead you "went it alone" as NWA's b1tch with really slow hiring in the the 90's and a pathetic contract. Take away the last 4 years and frankly, you would have done better just about anywhere else.

As to the FRNT deal, there are two sides to the story, and the UAL ALPA story is MUCH different. IIRC, the deal breaker was that UAL ALPA demanded that the FRNT guys be on the UAL seniority list, being paid UAL payrates, while the company wanted to operate them separately at much lower rates.

Why do I think the CAL would would have been good? You'd have seen 747-400s flying out of EWR to the pacific, and widebodies to most of the international destinations. I really don't think you would have seen the fences you feared. Heck, 777's and 747's have the same payrate. I think the UAL attitude on seniority is to do it once and do it right and after that, you fly what you can hold.

Now for the kicker, and this rumor was out BEFORE you got your letter...It has been reported that one of the big reasons the merger didn't happen is that CAL was unwilling to pay the pilots the new contract rates and equity the deal would have required..."stand by your man...."

You are stupid little man with a little pee pee! U know what I hope happens to you? Let me tell you. I hope that you come home from a trip late at night at United. You look up as you pull up into the driveway. All the lights in your house are out. Puzzled you collect your belongings and open the front door, reach in and flip the light switch. Nothing. Hmmm you think. The neighbors lights are on how come my mine arent. You figure its the fuses downstairs. You take a few steps in put your flight case on the ground and bend down to dig for your flashlight. All of a sudden you feel something wet quickly touch the back of your neck. Startled you jump away just as you felt it happen a second time. When you look up you realize that its a really big black man with no shirt on. The wet you felt was him licking your neck. Thinking your an athelete or something you try to bolt for the door. The next thing you know is all you can feel is stinging as he slaps you off your feet back into the kitchen. You can see him upon you all of a sudden and you protect yourself by trying to punch him. He doesnt even feel it! All you can hear is the big black man tearing your United uniform pants off. Before you can scream you feel something touch your buttocks.........Its okay T-bag, no one cares that you are gone, you left no pension or benefits to anyone.

 

[Jonny Sacko]

Now for the kicker, and this rumor was out BEFORE you got your letter...It has been reported that one of the big reasons the merger didn't happen is that CAL was unwilling to pay the pilots the new contract rates and equity the deal would have required..."stand by your man...."

I won't call you names, in case that's true. If it is, then you guys are also better off. I'm hoping and praying to see an "industry leading contract", but if what you say is true, well I'll remember this post. I'll gladly eat my words, cause the local attitude, I believe, is caustic. The pilots are pissed, but can they convey that properly, that's the 1 Billlllllioon dollar question. Can you put any credence in that statement, not that I don't believe it, but it might make it easier to swallow? Thanks if you can, and either way, good luck to us all.

 

[Kugelblitz]

I am no huge fan of our management, but it is utterly absurd to think that a component in the dissolution of this merger was pilot pay. Larry has even admitted himself that he knows he is going to have to pay us on this next contract. From his standpoint, locking us into a contract at the extant UAL rates would probably be a better deal than dealing with the irate membership at this point.

I think those of you who think this pilot pay theory is at all germane to the collapse of the merger negotiations are simply in denial about UAL's situation. There is little doubt at this point that UAL is in danger of becoming a new TWA in the sense of a hopeless business model and selling of vital, strategic routes to keep itself solvent for the day. I certainly don't wish to see this happen to those of you employed there, but it is a real possibility at this juncture.

To suggest that CAL is so fixated on keeping us pilots poor that they scuttled a deal that would have personally enrichend management handsomely is to obfuscsate the reality of UAL's critical financial circumstances.

 

[Jonny Sacko]

You are stupid little man with a little pee pee! U know what I hope happens to you? Let me tell you. I hope that you come home from a trip late at night at United. You look up as you pull up into the driveway. All the lights in your house are out. Puzzled you collect your belongings and open the front door, reach in and flip the light switch. Nothing. Hmmm you think. The neighbors lights are on how come my mine aren't. You figure its the fuses downstairs. You take a few steps in put your flight case on the ground and bend down to dig for your flashlight. All of a sudden you feel something wet quickly touch the back of your neck. Startled you jump away just as you felt it happen a second time. When you look up you realize that its a really big black man with no shirt on. The wet you felt was him licking your neck. Thinking your an athlete or something you try to bolt for the door. The next thing you know is all you can feel is stinging as he slaps you off your feet back into the kitchen. You can see him upon you all of a sudden and you protect yourself by trying to punch him. He doesn't even feel it! All you can hear is the big black man tearing your United uniform pants off. Before you can scream you feel something touch your buttocks.........Its okay T-bag, no one cares that you are gone, you left no pension or benefits to anyone.

Dude, I've gone off before and will again with anything to do with ALPA National, or Piss ant Prater, but that's kind of scary, psychotic. If you're drinking and posting, OK, but if that's sober, you might want to go jogging or go see a Disney movie, or something a little less stressful. It's cool, he's got his opinion, and it doesn't sit well with most others, but that scenario, is honestly a little demented. No troubles, we're all just cruising by, but that was a little troubling.

 

[Andy]

There is little doubt at this point that UAL is in danger of becoming a new TWA in the sense of a hopeless business model and selling of vital, strategic routes to keep itself solvent for the day. I certainly don't wish to see this happen to those of you employed there, but it is a real possibility at this juncture.

It ain't wine and roses, but it also isn't the darkest days of '04 yet. I'm not saying that United can't get down to that level, in which case the rumors of UAL being cut up between AMR and CAL could come true.
It was a really bad quarter; let's give it a couple more quarters to see how bad things are for UAL. There are others closer to the edge. UAL doesn't have to outlast every airline; it just has to outlast a few other airlines.

Dude, I've gone off before and will again with anything to do with ALPA National, or Piss ant Prater, but that's kind of scary, psychotic. If you're drinking and posting, OK, but if that's sober, you might want to go jogging or go see a Disney movie, or something a little less stressful. It's cool, he's got his opinion, and it doesn't sit well with most others, but that scenario, is honestly a little demented. No troubles, we're all just cruising by, but that was a little troubling.

Nice response. His post was borderline psycho.


Good luck to everyone over at CAL. You've got a good airline and management.

 

[Flopgut]

Honestly, the CAL hookup would have been the best deal for BOTH groups. It's all about perspective though. I've never understood the battered wife syndrome at CAL. Had a DAL deal gone through, you'd probably had much higher total earnings over the last 15 years. Instead you "went it alone" as NWA's b1tch with really slow hiring in the the 90's and a pathetic contract. Take away the last 4 years and frankly, you would have done better just about anywhere else.

As to the FRNT deal, there are two sides to the story, and the UAL ALPA story is MUCH different. IIRC, the deal breaker was that UAL ALPA demanded that the FRNT guys be on the UAL seniority list, being paid UAL payrates, while the company wanted to operate them separately at much lower rates.

Why do I think the CAL would would have been good? You'd have seen 747-400s flying out of EWR to the pacific, and widebodies to most of the international destinations. I really don't think you would have seen the fences you feared. Heck, 777's and 747's have the same payrate. I think the UAL attitude on seniority is to do it once and do it right and after that, you fly what you can hold.

Now for the kicker, and this rumor was out BEFORE you got your letter...It has been reported that one of the big reasons the merger didn't happen is that CAL was unwilling to pay the pilots the new contract rates and equity the deal would have required..."stand by your man...."

The deal NWA and CAL were to have was not approved by DOJ. We'll never know what that should have provided, but it's a pretty safe bet it's better than DAL.

Maybe CAL has screwed up? I thought it was a good match as well. But for whatever reason our guy backed out. Now, as you re-write history to make yourself feel better, don't forget: At no time during this has a CAL employee worn a "screw UAL" pin, displayed a decal that said "one less airline CAN make a difference" Or directed ANY sort of large scale, personal campaign against your pilot group.

BTW, your characterization of the FRNT deal is a complete fairy tale! You wanted them to have the same rates, but couldn't so you dropped them entirely?? "Do it once and do it right and after that, fly what you can hold" worked pretty good for you when they no longer had a job!!! And right after they honored your strike no less. Merger policy died that day. Shoot, you guys were going to do the same thing America West and USAir 10 years ago!! The new legislation will keep UAL ALPA honest.

**Edit: IF it was the dollars that squelched this deal, then it would be because CAL ALPA made it clear to mgt that there was to be expedited dual pilot contract and equity for both groups in the deal. We did not cut our own deal or seek to exclude UAL. Now, tell me you would have done the same?

 

[Kugelblitz]

It ain't wine and roses, but it also isn't the darkest days of '04 yet. I'm not saying that United can't get down to that level, in which case the rumors of UAL being cut up between AMR and CAL could come true.
It was a really bad quarter; let's give it a couple more quarters to see how bad things are for UAL. There are others closer to the edge. UAL doesn't have to outlast every airline; it just has to outlast a few other airlines.



I sincerely hope it never gets that bad. Very best of luck to all of you at United.

 

[T-Bags]

The deal NWA and CAL were to have was not approved by DOJ. We'll never know what that should have provided, but it's a pretty safe bet it's better than DAL.

Maybe CAL has screwed up? I thought it was a good match as well. But for whatever reason our guy backed out. Now, as you re-write history to make yourself feel better, don't forget: At no time during this has a CAL employee worn a "screw UAL" pin, displayed a decal that said "one less airline CAN make a difference" Or directed ANY sort of large scale, personal campaign against your pilot group.

BTW, your characterization of the FRNT deal is a complete fairy tale! You wanted them to have the same rates, but couldn't so you dropped them entirely?? "Do it once and do it right and after that, fly what you can hold" worked pretty good for you when they no longer had a job!!! And right after they honored your strike no less. Merger policy died that day. Shoot, you guys were going to do the same thing America West and USAir 10 years ago!! The new legislation will keep UAL ALPA honest.

A little clarity for you...
I have NEVER worn a "screw CAL" pin. I guess in your world every German citizen today is a Nazi. Ancient history. But if we are all about history, what you are so bitter about happened shortly after CAL and Lorenzo put EAL out of business and kept some of the spoils.
UAL ALPA NEVER STOPPED the FRNT deal. I don't know what planet you live on, but we were along for the ride. Our only demand was ONE LIST. Believe what you'd like.
Even more comical is your characterization of the previous attempts at a merger with U and AWA. AWA decided they wanted to go it alone so seniority issues weren't addressed. When it came to U, UAL attempted to negotiate a pre-nup that was fair, U said "pound sand, we get DOH..(some even wanted "super seniority" since the future was so bright and we were buying them because they were so valuable)...when can I pick up my -400 manuals". Sound familiar? How'd that work for them the last time they tried it.
To my knowledge, UAL has NEVER stapled a pilot group. As a matter of fact, when the Pacific Pan Am routes were purchased, UAL took a few crappy Airplanes, and some VERY senior pilots and GAVE THEM DOH (some of the former National guys got super seniority since they were slotted above some of the Pan Am guys in their merger).
If you don't think employee cost is a huge factor (but not the only factor) in whether these deals will work, then you're dreaming. I'm sure there were other big issues (like the cost of fuel and if taking on the cost of merging when the industry is in a downturn is a good idea...)
As a UAL pilot (on a LOA), I would NEVER advocate a staple. I would NEVER advocate windfalls. I'm for being FAIR. Heck, I even personally oppose fences. After the dust settles, I think having a JOB trumps stroking my ego. You have to work together to keep the airline going. You may not think so now, but the industry NEEDS consolidation. I'm all for rationalization. I'm all for our industry "cutting capacity" and acting like an Oligopoly. Oil companies were HURTING in the late 90's. They were allowed to merge in the late 90's and look at them now. I'd like to see the days of 78 credit hour months (with even less hard hours). 3:1 trip rigs and contract 2001 payrates (adjusted for inflation). That won't happen until we reduce the number of players.

 

[T-Bags]

**Edit: IF it was the dollars that squelched this deal, then it would be because CAL ALPA made it clear to mgt that there was to be expedited dual pilot contract and equity for both groups in the deal. We did not cut our own deal or seek to exclude UAL. Now, tell me you would have done the same?

Let's be frank, it's ALWAYS THE DOLLARS THAT MAKE OR BREAK A DEAL!! What else matters? For all the gnashing of teeth over UAL's first Q, keep in mind they burned $80 million in Cash during the airlines WORST quarter. Some of the loss was the inclusion of the profit sharing checks (that accounted for profit charing for the entire previous year). Could it have been better? YES!! But from a practical standpoint, do you look at Larry and wonder what COULD be done with UAL's route structure? What COULD be done when you match up EWR and IAH with the Pacific route structure, LHR and over 100 more widebody jets (including better than 30 747-400s)? Do you imagine the growth potential and the new flying that could come out of that?
A joint contract? A seniority prenup? Do you really think UAL ALPA would want a deal without them in place? Let me kill any doubts, we are on the same sheet of music!! Strength in Unity!

 

[Andy]

Gents, United's pilots' history isn't spotless. They also shafted the Air Willy pilots. But most of us don't remember those events and need to google them to have any idea what's being talked about. How many on this board were in the industry in the 80s?

Those things happen. I didn't hear a resounding outcry when a bunch of airlines and employees of those airlines ganged up on United back in 04, hoping to kill them and carve them up.
Here's my list:
Atlantic Coast Airlines, a UAL express carrier, decides to start their own airline out IAD. Kills UAL's yields out of IAD.
Frontier Airlines goes into full expansion mode post 9/11, killing United's yields out of DEN.
American pilots cruising the B/C concourses at O'Hare in an attempt to pull passengers away from United.
The various threads on this and other forums discussing the carving up of UAL and which carrier would get which piece of UAL.

I'm sure that there are plenty of other instances. I'd bet that many on this board have had conversations in the past how they'd like to see their airline get United's (fill in blank) once they fold.

For anyone to get on this board and jump all over United's pilots for what happened 20 years ago, when less than 5 years ago everyone was circling UAL's carcass, is pretty dorked up.

We're just at the beginning of problems for airlines. There are going to be companies going chap 7; it won't be pretty. I hope that it's not your airline. I'm less worried about my future should UAL go under; there's always other opportunities. I'm thinking of taking piano lessons; I hope that they're still hiring piano players at the local whorehouse.

Good luck to all.

 

[SFR]

Hooray!!!! This is great!!!! Let UAL go somewhere else!!!

 

[Kugelblitz]

Gents, United's pilots' history isn't spotless. They also shafted the Air Willy pilots. But most of us don't remember those events and need to google them to have any idea what's being talked about. How many on this board were in the industry in the 80s?

Those things happen. I didn't hear a resounding outcry when a bunch of airlines and employees of those airlines ganged up on United back in 04, hoping to kill them and carve them up.
Here's my list:
Atlantic Coast Airlines, a UAL express carrier, decides to start their own airline out IAD. Kills UAL's yields out of IAD.
Frontier Airlines goes into full expansion mode post 9/11, killing United's yields out of DEN.
American pilots cruising the B/C concourses at O'Hare in an attempt to pull passengers away from United.
The various threads on this and other forums discussing the carving up of UAL and which carrier would get which piece of UAL.

I'm sure that there are plenty of other instances. I'd bet that many on this board have had conversations in the past how they'd like to see their airline get United's (fill in blank) once they fold.

For anyone to get on this board and jump all over United's pilots for what happened 20 years ago, when less than 5 years ago everyone was circling UAL's carcass, is pretty dorked up.

We're just at the beginning of problems for airlines. There are going to be companies going chap 7; it won't be pretty. I hope that it's not your airline. I'm less worried about my future should UAL go under; there's always other opportunities. I'm thinking of taking piano lessons; I hope that they're still hiring piano players at the local whorehouse.

Good luck to all.

I find the notion that AA pilots were attempting to sway pax away from UAL by approaching them in the terminal a bit far fetched. Can you expand on that?