The deal NWA and CAL were to have was not approved by DOJ. We'll never know what that should have provided, but it's a pretty safe bet it's better than DAL.
Maybe CAL has screwed up? I thought it was a good match as well. But for whatever reason our guy backed out. Now, as you re-write history to make yourself feel better, don't forget: At no time during this has a CAL employee worn a "screw UAL" pin, displayed a decal that said "one less airline CAN make a difference" Or directed ANY sort of large scale, personal campaign against your pilot group.
BTW, your characterization of the FRNT deal is a complete fairy tale! You wanted them to have the same rates, but couldn't so you dropped them entirely?? "Do it once and do it right and after that, fly what you can hold" worked pretty good for you when they no longer had a job!!! And right after they honored your strike no less. Merger policy died that day. Shoot, you guys were going to do the same thing America West and USAir 10 years ago!! The new legislation will keep UAL ALPA honest.
A little clarity for you...
I have NEVER worn a "screw CAL" pin. I guess in your world every German citizen today is a Nazi. Ancient history. But if we are all about history, what you are so bitter about happened shortly after CAL and Lorenzo put EAL out of business and kept some of the spoils.
UAL ALPA NEVER STOPPED the FRNT deal. I don't know what planet you live on, but we were along for the ride. Our only demand was ONE LIST. Believe what you'd like.
Even more comical is your characterization of the previous attempts at a merger with U and AWA. AWA decided they wanted to go it alone so seniority issues weren't addressed. When it came to U, UAL attempted to negotiate a pre-nup that was fair, U said "pound sand, we get DOH..(some even wanted "super seniority" since the future was so bright and we were buying them because they were so valuable)...when can I pick up my -400 manuals". Sound familiar? How'd that work for them the last time they tried it.
To my knowledge, UAL has NEVER stapled a pilot group. As a matter of fact, when the Pacific Pan Am routes were purchased, UAL took a few crappy Airplanes, and some VERY senior pilots and GAVE THEM DOH (some of the former National guys got super seniority since they were slotted above some of the Pan Am guys in their merger).
If you don't think employee cost is a huge factor (but not the only factor) in whether these deals will work, then you're dreaming. I'm sure there were other big issues (like the cost of fuel and if taking on the cost of merging when the industry is in a downturn is a good idea...)
As a UAL pilot (on a LOA), I would NEVER advocate a staple. I would NEVER advocate windfalls. I'm for being FAIR. Heck, I even personally oppose fences. After the dust settles, I think having a JOB trumps stroking my ego. You have to work together to keep the airline going. You may not think so now, but the industry NEEDS consolidation. I'm all for rationalization. I'm all for our industry "cutting capacity" and acting like an Oligopoly. Oil companies were HURTING in the late 90's. They were allowed to merge in the late 90's and look at them now. I'd like to see the days of 78 credit hour months (with even less hard hours). 3:1 trip rigs and contract 2001 payrates (adjusted for inflation). That won't happen until we reduce the number of players.