twighead
Pan Pan
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Posts
- 281
I'd watch it before my next flight then.....
Don't worry I already did earlier. That's how I knew I had never seen it before.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd watch it before my next flight then.....
I don't know about the pusher on a Q-400, but on the ATR the pusher is not tied in with the radio altimeter and is never inhibited in flight except for 10 seconds after takeoff.
Tail stall occurs when the angle of attack goes excessively negative.
Main wing stall occurs when the angle of attack goes excessively positive.
The pusher only fires at high angles of attack. The pusher should not fire during a tail stall... however if a tail stall leads to an upset it is understandable at some point during the attempted recovery the angle of attack could exceed the amount required to fire the pusher.
As someone of a friend who works for the NTSB this is what REALLY happened.....
autopilot was engages, one of the wing's de-icing system was working, the other did not work (due to a mechanical failure that is still under investigation at this moment....). The crew lost control of the aircraft as it spiraled to the ground in a nose dive from loss of lift on one of the wings.
A lift imbalance due to one wing unable to melt the ice off caused this crash!
Godspeed to all!
I'm on dial-up. What does it say?