Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Chautauqua Triumph

  • Thread starter Thread starter EMB Skillz
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 50

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Pilot ethics question. Your company wins 69 aircraft. You are now looking at upgrade. You are supposed to.
A. Leave your job on principal
B. Not be excited about upgrade and doubling your pay
C. Have a mach funeral for XJet pilots then... take your upgrade and smile when your first $4,000 check comes.

Sorry guys. My company didn't get the flying but if it did I would be pretty happy about upgrading. All the flying we do comes at somebodies expense.
 
Last edited:
SkyBoy1981 said:
Why are we talking like an inner city gangster? Do you talk like that at your job interviews as well?

That's why we call CHQ "Shaniqua" here in 'da ATL. Or "Shi-t-ka-ka".

Sad to seem some junior pilot bragging that he'll prosper due to the misfortune of others. Apparently the CHQ pilot group has even less class than we thought, since none of them have chimed in to spank him, I guess they agree with him.

I wouldn't be surprised if the CHQ pilots flying to CoEx bases have a hard time getting to work.
 
The Drizzle said:
Maybe because it is pretty obvious that he isn't a CHQ/RAH employee? You may want to look at this tool's posts in the past.
You guys never learn, do you?

I believe Mr. Drizzle is correct. But it makes no difference whether this EMB Skillz person is a poser or just a twit CHQ guy.

He doesn't even have to reel you in; you're jumping into the boat. I hope the game warden isn't waiting on the dock, because if he is the uber-baiter EMB Skillz will be subject to a large fine for catching over the creel limit.

All who attempted to engage in debate (as it is [loosely]defined in this esteemed forum) should feel very foolish that you allowed him to make you, by actual definition rather than just popular insult, his tools.
 
Last edited:
John Pennekamp said:
That's why we call CHQ "Shaniqua" here in 'da ATL. Or "Shi-t-ka-ka".

Sad to seem some junior pilot bragging that he'll prosper due to the misfortune of others. Apparently the CHQ pilot group has even less class than we thought, since none of them have chimed in to spank him, I guess they agree with him.

I wouldn't be surprised if the CHQ pilots flying to CoEx bases have a hard time getting to work.


I have never ever seen a bunch of mindless idiots! This guy does not even work at CHQ and you were sucked in AGAIN!! WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!
 
Crash Pad said:
Pilot ethics question. Your company wins 69 aircraft. You are now looking at upgrade. You are supposed to.
A. Leave your job on principal
B. Not be excited about upgrade and doubling your pay
C. Have a mach funeral for XJet pilots then... take your upgrade and smile when your first $4,000 check comes.

Sorry guys. My company didn't get the flying but if it did I would be pretty happy about upgrading. All the flying we do comes at somebodies expense.
You are a fricken moron to the max. You don't go around gloating about taking over someone elses job that you didn't earn, especially in public. And a bigger man wouldn't even do it in private. For all those S**ty Taco pilots that are gloating about their "accomplishment" (seems like alot of), I wish FAA violations, failed checkrides, and minor airplane bending/non casualty accidents on to you!!! That will go well with with your Embry Riddle degree, Stuff magazine collection, spike hairy gel, and myspace ads. In other words, go hug a Mesa pilot - they are your real brothers.
 
EMBPILOT1 said:
I have never ever seen a bunch of mindless idiots! This guy does not even work at CHQ and you were sucked in AGAIN!! WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!

And, pray tell, how should I have known that? WAKE UP!!!
 
Finally. Thank you Axel. I cant believe it took until page three for someone to get it. Well, actually The Drizzle knew on page two, I'll give him credit. Seriously people. How f'ing stupid are yall. This guy clearly wants to get a rise out of people and you all bought into it. How sad.
 
Are you guys so stupid as to fall for the rhoid, guat, ihaveapension, etc...? This is some retarded lineboy from the midwest working on his instrument ticket and laughing at you guys getting all torqued off at his obvious flame bait.

Hey, here's a serious question: SDF and CRP for my layovers this weekend. Anybody want to suggest some good BBQ?
 
Theres always a few bad apples. Not everybody is all happy about this.


John Pennekamp said:
That's why we call CHQ "Shaniqua" here in 'da ATL. Or "Shi-t-ka-ka".

Sad to seem some junior pilot bragging that he'll prosper due to the misfortune of others. Apparently the CHQ pilot group has even less class than we thought, since none of them have chimed in to spank him, I guess they agree with him.

I wouldn't be surprised if the CHQ pilots flying to CoEx bases have a hard time getting to work.
 
silverfish said:
Finally. Thank you Axel. I cant believe it took until page three for someone to get it. Well, actually The Drizzle knew on page two, I'll give him credit. Seriously people. How f'ing stupid are yall. This guy clearly wants to get a rise out of people and you all bought into it. How sad.
I'll agree the original poster probably is not a S**tytaco pilot. However seeing some of the crap on myspace, and seeing taco pilots in person on various occasions, I'm sure their are far to plenty that really do subscribe to this thought process. And that is why it is justifiable to respond and slam those types. I sure hope the descent guys at Chataqua with a grip on reality educate these accidents waiting to happen to keep their egos and sense of excitement in check by replacing it with humble subdued respect. The very general type of SJS mindset "gee, look at me I'm an airline pilot making my way up with flying at Continental" is the same type that caused those 2 dweedle brains with Pinnacle to come down fast from 410.
 
Anyone else notice this guy sounds a lot like D'Angelo? Definitely doesn't work for CHQ and is probably in management somewhere.
 
1) He doesn't work here.
2) If he does, those of us that would educate him would try but do you think he'd listen? If, in the odd chance he works here, that is his attitude, he'll do something dumb and get fired, for that we'll all rejoice.
3) Read the press release. Those A/C are not being taken from XJT, they are removed from CAL. Whether we acquire the leases, I hope not, or buy new jets does not matter. Those 69 A/C are yours for you MGT to place.
 
I remember an XJET guy posting on here a few months back that XJET can return the aircraft and still make a profit even without the 69 jets of flying. Is that still true? Do you expect furloughs to happen? I have quite a few buddies there that haven't been there even a year and it would totally suck if they lost their jobs.
 
Fellas, fellas, here is the dilemma. The regional airlines are hiring too many little boys. EMB skillz is just such an example. He probably doesn't have a wife, kids, mortgage, bills, or a life. I mean, if he had a life, he would spend time posting constructive comments rather than taking pot shots at a pilot group that is a bit disappointed at the moment. Seriously, who starts a thread called CHQ triumph? That is very classy my friend. As for all the other CHQ pilots, I'm not happy about it; but it wasn't you who created this situation. In reality, one regional replacing another regional is never going to stop until the PILOT GROUPS make it stop.

Examples:
Who ever it was that replaced Air Wisc's capacity with United, refuse to fly that capacity. Put it back where it had successfully resided for a long time.

Pilots refuse to be hired by *************************s, when the company is unable to staff its flight decks, TSA retains what was rightfully agreed upon.

Pilot groups refuse to accept Northwest Airlink flying at the expense of Mesaba and/or Pinnacle. Great, your company won the bid. As a unionized pilot group, you do not accept this work in order to protect the interests of another pilot group. Am I my brother's keeper?

CHQ pilot refuse to accept COEX flying. COEX pilot refuse to accept other regional's flying. We all maintain the status quo, and therefore our jobs and career progression. If our company pays a little more or a little less, who cares. We all made decisions on where we wanted to work... live with it. That is part of being an adult and a professional.

As for furloughs, etc., don't even talk about such things. Express Jet will come out ok, I suspect with even more growth. All though, I fear it will be the same old airline circle of life. We will inevitably, replace the flying capacity of another carrier, maybe CHQ, who knows. As for our mature friends on the board, we would all be better if you would please take your minimal experience and leave the profession. To the few arrogant folks on this board, on behalf of myself, my wife, my three children, my mortgage company, and my school loan provider... may your precious upgrade be all that you hoped it would be. I hope that you will never have to deal with what we have dealt with these last few months, as we prepare for the worst (loss of upgrade and job), and hope for the best (growth) and newfound diversity for our company.
 
beech cowboy,

While a majority of your post is quite well written, there are a few things I want to take to task.

First, not many people in low seniority positions at RAH are "little boys" obviously we have one or two as evidenced by some posts, but lately, most are furloghed 121 pilots, or people such as yourself, leaving Colgan in search of something better.

Second, as you have pointed out in numerous posts, you are new to union stuff. I want to let you in on a seceret. If we go with your suggestion and not fly, that is considered a "self-help action" and since we are not in the appropriate phase of negotiations, that would translate to an "illegal work stoppage". Also, there is no COEX flying...It is CO's flying...And if we followed that train of logic, you shouldn't have worked at Colgan, because that was CHQ's flying, Allegheny's flying, PSA's flying and Piedmont's flying.
If we back up enough, it should all be mainline flying.

Good luck....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top