Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

CE-750 Trans-Pacific?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

421Driver

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Posts
172
An owner is looking into the X for some international ops. Anyone fly the X to Tokyo, Hong-Kong, or Sao Paolo? Departing from central US (obviously with some fuel stops) What stops have you used? Any aircraft for a similar price with better range? Any planes that would save D.O.C. over the X on such routes, even with a larger initial investment?
 
421Driver said:
An owner is looking into the X for some international ops. Anyone fly the X to Tokyo, Hong-Kong, or Sao Paolo? Departing from central US (obviously with some fuel stops) What stops have you used? Any aircraft for a similar price with better range? Any planes that would save D.O.C. over the X on such routes, even with a larger initial investment?
How about a Falcon 50EX, slightly longer range and has 3 engines...

A Citation X to Sao Paulo shouldn't be an issue from the central US... Stop in Maiquetia, Venezuela (Caracas) then on to SBGR... For Tokyo or Hong Kong you are probably going to want something with longer legs and a bigger cabin... I couldn't imagine being bottled up in that tiny X cabin for a ride that far...
 
I agree with Falcon capt., If paying for a X might as well pay almost the same for a 50 EX and get better range, slight better cabin and a #3....If money is not too much of a problem go with a G-IV
 
Toyko

It really depends on how often the owner plans of doing this. Once in a great while, don't sweat it. I have done Japan with a Lear 35 and 36. Tight and cramped. Once was an owner trip that was a once in a lifetime trip. The other times were air ambulance. It takes a lot of planning and preparation. In the G4 is a snap, compared with the Lear.
 
If you are talking Tokyo and Hong Kong from the central US you really want to look for something bigger than a Citation X.

Once a year...OK....whatever...but anything on a frequent basis would be rediculous in that aircraft!

Can a X go from PANC-RJAA? my guess would be yes, but still.....UAL First class from Chicago would be 100X more comfy! (hate to say it.)

I would vote for a used GIV. cant go wrong..... DA900 maybe? at least its not quite the coffin the X is.
 
Rick1128 said:
It really depends on how often the owner plans of doing this. Once in a great while, don't sweat it. I have done Japan with a Lear 35 and 36. Tight and cramped. Once was an owner trip that was a once in a lifetime trip. The other times were air ambulance. It takes a lot of planning and preparation. In the G4 is a snap, compared with the Lear.

Duude, I think the owner must be from Univ. of Illinois.
 
G100driver said:
Have considered a Legacy? Any questions just look up WSCofD.
Um, just the clarify, in a previous thread we determined that "Sh!tcan" is infact one word, so the proper abbreviation is WSofD...


Embraer Legacy Soon To Be Cleared to FL410
Embraer this spring expects to complete certification that will increase the service ceiling of the Legacy business jet from FL370 to FL410.
I thought WSofDDriver said he has been flying it at FL390 already... HHmmm... Has someone been a bad boy???
 
Last edited:
Falcon Capt said:
Um, just the clarify, in a previous thread we determined that "Sh!tcan" is infact one word, so the proper abbreviation is WSofD...

Hey! Snakum got sent to the sin bin for doing the symbol to circumvent the censor trick.

Just like NHL refs - no consistency. :D

Seriously, though, WSofD just doesn't have the same ring to it as the WSCoD.
e.g., "Traffic at 12 o'clock, 5 miles is a WSCoD" (pronounced Whis-Cod).
 
Brett Hull said:
Hey! Snakum got sent to the sin bin for doing the symbol to circumvent the censor trick.
Hhhmmm... Interesting... Well I guess we know which Moderator DIDN'T send him to "The Box"! ;) (Do I have to ban myself now???)

Brett Hull said:
Seriously, though, WSofD just doesn't have the same ring to it as the WSCoD.
e.g., "Traffic at 12 o'clock, 5 miles is a WSCoD" (pronounced Whis-Cod).
Yeah, I agree, and in the beginning I was referring to it as the WSCofD... We can start a grass roots movement to revise the designation! So when filing a flight plan, would the proper aircraft type then be "WSCD"??? (since the FAA will only take 4 characters)
 
The X is built to go fast. That's it.

I explain to people it's like the concord. The cabin sucks so that's why it goes so fast.

Kind of the same concept. Although the cabin isn't bad just going to tokyo or nrt is a looooong flight. 1 a year no big deal. You can do it. Plan on about 3 stops going there. Maybe 2.
 
bestpilot said:
Duude, I think the owner must be from Univ. of Illinois.

Actually not. He had several stops to make on that side of the rim. We actually ended up in Australia when we finished up. It was a last minute trip. Thank Heavens for Universal Weather. And with his increase in business he now owns a G4.

Sometimes you just have to go with what you have. Its one thing if it isn't safe. Just because you as a pilot are uncomfortable is an entirely differnet matter.
 
Anyone have a D.O.C. comparason of the X, DA-50EX, DA-2000EX, and G-IV? I probably could ask the manufacturers, but everyone here has been so helpful in the past.


Found some #'s, if they look out of line, let me know.
CE-750 ----- $1834
DA-50EX --- $1702
DA-2000EX - $3238 (high?)
DA-900EX -- $1783
G-IVSP ----- $2175
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom