Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not sure the exit was for short term reasons, which is why ARW and SkyWest signed their contract. Indy knew that *their* long term viability with that new contract was zilch. Why let United bleed Indy's bank account over a long period of time, leaving them no cash when they finally kick them out in 2009? Better to cut your losses now while you still have cash in the bank. Some rumors I've heard had ACA mgmt floating plans for an independent carrier *long* before the UAL fiasco. If that was indeed the case, you can bet they'll use *any* PR spin they can to claim that UAL forced them out.Kohflot said:From the FlyI website:
In December 2002, United went into bankruptcy and tried to force us to change the way we had done business in the past, by offering all of its partners a significantly inferior contract. Some accepted the risks of continuing with a bankrupt major airline. But we had a better plan.
This is the question I've always asked: Did SkyWest really get such an inferior contract too? If it's so bad, how are they still making as much money as they are?
I'm not trying to bash anyone, just curious...