SuperKooter
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
- Posts
- 417
Why?.
Because the average American knows what unions are all about and doesn't like them. It just makes us look like we are crybabies in their eyes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?.
Because the average American knows what unions are all about and doesn't like them. It just makes us look like we are crybabies in their eyes.
Because the average American knows what unions are all about and doesn't like them. It just makes us look like we are crybabies in their eyes.
Your response could be percieved as opinion. Do you have any references, past experience (non personal) or resources?
so at my airline hats are optional during summer uniform...so am i less professional from April-October because i leave the sweatbucket at home during the summer?
I've got my personal feeling about the hat, especially in summer... but I also know that the hat is a unique indicator of Air Line Pilots. It is a eye catching symbol that the public recognizes.... That image/symbol has value.
Still no real arguements against the hat from a professional viewpoint.
Anyone?
Alright. Here goes.
As I've said before, that classic pilot hat is very much a throwback. A throwback to the early days of aviation when maritime terms and symbology were adopted, giving a structure of authority to an endeaver which had none.
This is only your opinion. Do you have a reference that suggests that hat is a throw back?
And yet every organization that wants to promote the image of a pilot or use the pilot image to promote thier product or service shows the pilot with the hat.
The pilot hat's status as a symbol of the profession, and thus the so callled 'professional image', is very much rooted in that seagoing tradition. But at least in the seagoing context, and some early aviation endeavors, the hat served a purpose.
Rooted in sea going tradition but made Air Line Tradition for over 75 years....
The hat in our day is very much a symbol of blue collar labor. While not taking anything away from the myriad of technical and arduous endeavors falling under the 'blue collar' label, I would submit that the education, technical, and demeanor requirements of the Airline Pilot trade, take us outside the blue collar moniker.
Maybe so, nonetheless, the Air Line Pilot hat has become a symbol of the profession. The latest SWA commerical is an example.
While we are a generally unionized group, the challenges of modern economies have brought unions into many areas including professional education and medicine. Neither are considered 'blue collar'.
Not sure what blue collar has to do with it. The hat like the stripes and shoulder boards have nothing to do with blue collar labor. Yet we are.
I submit that the hat actually brings us down as professionals, putting our image into the same throwback blue collar bin as milkmen, gas station clerks , and maytag repairmen.
No, milkmen (if they still exists and wear Air Line style hats), gas station clerks (huh???) and Maytag repiar man (you've really lost me...). But if you insist on using these types of non current examples, they were wearing the hat cause the hat image made by military types helped sell their service with trust and repsect.
Lose the hats.
All of your "ideas" are your own.... you have no reference to your opinion. I am open to any ideas that the hat is deterimental, but so far the "No Hat" crowd is simply pissed off legacy guys with no pension and neo-kids looking for personal comfort.
But yet SWA feels to sell thier tickets the image of an airline pilot wearing a hat is needed. They have had over 30 years profit.
FedEx pilots who normally don't wear hats, got hats and wore them. They now have the best contract in the biz.
Does anyone have a valid professional arguement against the hat. Why is it that SWA and FedEx, the money makers, use the hat? and if the hat is good any given day then why not every day?
To show the hat doesn't work, an example needs to be shown of how the hat costs an organization, whether it is a company or an MEC, money or promotes a poor image to the public.
We all know the hat is cumbersome. So are line checks, 0500 shows, CDOs, Junior Manning, PT events, medicals and all of the other sacrfices that we make as professionals. But at some point to claim professional status we have to put aside personal gain (in this case sacrficing image for convienence).
Anyone?
Today, I don’t see why we need to “look respectable” in order to be respected.
I think your attitude and your demeanor will dictate whether you’ll get respect from others.
Today? So yesterday or yester-year was different? How? How is it "before" we needed to "look respectable" but today we don't? Do we no longer need or want respect?
Attitude and demeanor? And yet there is another thread asking why passengers are rude to pilots? Perhaps passengers see a uniformed airport employee and assume "this pilot" is a TSA agent, porter or wheelchair usher.
Do you want to be respected more than a TSA Agent? Do you want to be credited with having a college degree, flight training and having the lives of your passengers in your hands? Or do you want to treated like you know the difference between a gel and turkey sandwhich?
If you don't then perhaps we shouldn't look like one who does...
yeah. they assume i can tell them there gate, where to grab a smoke, push their wheelchair, where their car is parked, etc, etc. i don't mind helping people one bit. but the hat doesn't seperate me from any other airline employee or service worker. i've had all of these situations occur while wearing the hat.
the hat needs to retire. the pay is gone. the retirement is gone. might as well keep my hair and sweat less.