PCL_128 said:
Quite simply, because that's not the way the system is set up.
You'll need to reference policy or precedence. You saying the system is... is not conclusive.
PCL_128 said:
The President of the Association is the final decision maker. I don't expect him to second guess every contract decision that an MEC/pilot group makes, but he should definitely think long and hard before signing multiple contracts that contain nearly 50% cuts in compensation.
ALPA National functions as our repsresentative in Washington DC on National issues. He is not the final decision maker for local MEC's. If the president was as you suggested then the new complaint would be that ALPA National meddles in MEC affairs too much. As of now that is a managements compliant.
PCL_128 said:
Pilot groups and individual MECs are frequently caught between a rock and a hard place and feel they have no choice. Their vision is clouded by fears of lost jobs and bankruptcy at their own airlines. The President is an objective third party not under duress that can make the final decision over these things.
This is a big statement that you are making. Which to me reads that MEC's are not repsonsibile for thier own... If this were the case, then the mind set would be from the MEC and NC.. we'll put out a crappy TA and just let the President shoot it down, then we'll go back to the company and say... sorry, the Big Guy said no.
This happened at Midway and the company did shut down and ALPA pilots lost thier jobs. If the President said no to the UAL, DAL and NWA concessionary TA's the company might say 'fine... we are going to cut costs somehow... via massive furlough'.... Now, the President has caused more people to lose thier jobs. A 100% pay cut is alot worse than 50%.
Let's keep in mind the current circumstance.. terrorism, gov't and poor management.
PCL_128 said:
In my opinion, Captain Woerth has been derelict in his duties in this area. The profession may never recover from the past five years, and I think the President shares in the blame for that.
What should he have done differently? Specifically....
I think if he was derelict then a recall would be going down.... I think
any president in this current environement would not have a favorable approval rating...
I say he should have made a better connection to the membership. Pragmatic and mature people understand terrorism, predatory management, anti labor Admins, etc... What they don't like is aloof or distant leadership, like DW.
If DW kept a good connection with the membership, I think we could've been much more effective in convincing management and gov't of our collective power. However, we can't convince managment or gov't if we are in fighting and don't understand how the organization functions...
this is one of our big problems that we can control. Our own understanding and involvment.
Do Air Line Pilots have to have great/good contracts to be effective ALPA members? Is thier pride in profession dependant on income?
My concern is, despite DW's leadership failure with the rank and file, as Air Line Pilots we've disregarded
our leadership role. We have assumed a dependant role on one guy....
Which is confusing.. becuase on the Line, we are the leaders of the operation. But once we leave the flightdeck we assume a followership role in our careers, putting our hopes and wishes into one guy?
I won't do that. The president of ALPA is not the sole provider of good contracts for my career. I am not giving him or her that much control....
PCL_128 said:
In his defense, it's my understanding that Capt. Burke worked extensively with IFALPA as part of his duties as IACP President. I don't believe this will be a new responsibility for him.
copy that... the truth is what it is....