Pay for initial training v. P-F-T
I second Timebuilder's comments in every way about comparing flight training to going to college and how legit companies should hire you and train you without paying them.
I enjoy these discussions because they make me think of other lines of work. Let's talk about law (because that's what I'm doing now!) and radio, because that's what Timebuilder and I did before flying. In both occupations, you have to go through a certain amount of training when you start a new job. In a law office, no matter how much experience you have (translate that to quals and hours) you have to learn how files are organized, how deadlines are maintained, which standard forms to use, which software is on the computer, where the copier and postage meters are, etc. You may not be 100% familiar with these items, although you've been doing the work for years. Someone has to show you, so, yes, you still have to be trained. But, you don't pay for it.
In radio, you may have worked in the major markets, e.g., New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, Philly, etc. But, the equipment, i.e. tape recorders, tape cartridge players, turntables, CD players, etc. will be different from radio station to radio station and every radio station does things different (translate to airplane, checklists, SOPs, etc., differences training). Someone will show you how to operate the broadcast console and transmitter, train you in the station's format, and at least supervise you for a while to ensure you can run the equipment competently while on the air. You are being trained. You are not paying for that training.
I reiterate Timebuilder's comment: It make no difference what occupation you're in, as far as training goes, "YOU should not be paying THEM."