Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Annapolis the movie?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Military cheese has nothing on civilian airline disaster cheese. Anyone see "final descent"? Ouch. Saw it while stuck awake in some air force inn late at night not too long ago.

Airliner's tail stuck in full up position, so it keeps climbing until it will run out of fuel.

Helicopter unsuccesfully shoots at tail to "free the jam"

Robert Urich (Lucky) realizes he's in love with his FO co.

Air Force KC 135 pumps water through the boom and into the nose compartment of the airliner, enabling the nose to lower, and for the flight to make it's "final descent".

Lucky drops the gear, water dumps out, plane flares and lands, he gets laid.
Riveting stuff.
 
KarmaPolice said:
Military cheese has nothing on civilian airline disaster cheese. Anyone see "final descent"? Ouch. Saw it while stuck awake in some air force inn late at night not too long ago.

Airliner's tail stuck in full up position, so it keeps climbing until it will run out of fuel.

Helicopter unsuccesfully shoots at tail to "free the jam"

Robert Urich (Lucky) realizes he's in love with his FO co.

Air Force KC 135 pumps water through the boom and into the nose compartment of the airliner, enabling the nose to lower, and for the flight to make it's "final descent".

Lucky drops the gear, water dumps out, plane flares and lands, he gets laid.
Riveting stuff.

Mil cheese vs Civ cheese. Now THERE'S a thread worthwhile! Great post!
 
original Airport was OK, rest were sh!t
 
KarmaPolice said:
Military cheese has nothing on civilian airline disaster cheese. Anyone see "final descent"? Ouch. Saw it while stuck awake in some air force inn late at night not too long ago.

Airliner's tail stuck in full up position, so it keeps climbing until it will run out of fuel.

Helicopter unsuccesfully shoots at tail to "free the jam"

Robert Urich (Lucky) realizes he's in love with his FO co.

Air Force KC 135 pumps water through the boom and into the nose compartment of the airliner, enabling the nose to lower, and for the flight to make it's "final descent".

Lucky drops the gear, water dumps out, plane flares and lands, he gets laid.
Riveting stuff.

Wait... this is actually a movie?
 
Andy said:
Dave, I have no intention of seeing it. The previous comments had nothing to do with interservice rivalries, or however you seemed to read it. The movie just looks like a lame ripoff of 'An Officer and a Gentleman.'

What on earth could possibly give you the idea that we were ripping on the Navy? The bulk of the comments were from tanker toads and trash haulers. While it may be possible to mount tailhooks on large tanker/transport aircraft, I think that it's safe to say that aircraft of our size would only land on a carrier once (or to be factually correct, crash on a carrier only once).

I'll assume you're not a canoe U grad since I don't think that any academy grad in his right friggin mind would get upset about this movie being mocked. Are you a wannabe canoe U grad, just like you're a wanna be SEAL with carrier landings?
Sorry, I don't have any super cool made up stories. I just passed gas.


I would like to point out that a NAVY pilot did land a C-130 on a carrier before. So, who wants to be the first C-135 guy? Sorry, just noticed someone else beat me to it. Oh, it wasn't the length of the runway that was bad. It was the wingtip seperation the plane had with the island on the deck that was the kicker. The plane had to be rigged so they could go into BETA while airborne.
 
Last edited:
fredflyer said:
I won't even have to watch it and I know it'll be cheezier than all the Iron Eagles put together (yes Dave, you can probably throw Stealth in there, too).

It is not possible for a movie to be cheezier than 'Iron Eagle'! Except maybe 'Red Flag, the Ultimate Game'.
 
Spyguy said:
Oh, it wasn't the length of the runway that was bad.

Dude, in order to get that kind of landing ground roll, they went into reverse thrust while airborne. At that point, there is no option to go around.
And 15 feet is a tight margin. They're lucky that the Forrestal didn't lose the control tower. What was the CNO drinking when he ordered those tests, and where can I get some of that?
I guess that I should ask Dave 'I'm a Navy SEAL' Griffin; he sounds like he's got the inside scoop on what to drink to be completely delusional.
 
The movie sucked. It was about boxing. The whole thing was about frickin boxing and how he wanted to beat up his commanding officer. By far the worst movie I have ever seen.
 
Spyguy said:
The plane had to be rigged so they could go into BETA while airborne.

No rigging neccessary, you can go to Beta anytime in the herk (dont know about the J)
 
MAGNUM!! said:
You flew F-111's. There is nothing cheesier than that....

OK, I'm sorry I flipped you the bird when I blew your doors off that time I passed you at Red Flag.
 
Andy said:
Dude, in order to get that kind of landing ground roll, they went into reverse thrust while airborne. At that point, there is no option to go around.
And 15 feet is a tight margin. They're lucky that the Forrestal didn't lose the control tower. What was the CNO drinking when he ordered those tests, and where can I get some of that?
I guess that I should ask Dave 'I'm a Navy SEAL' Griffin; he sounds like he's got the inside scoop on what to drink to be completely delusional.

Andy;

I know we are all thankful that you and the 'reduce risk at all costs' AF Puke decision making process was not the prevailing mentality when we were engaged in critical but dangerous endeavors such as the development of Naval Carrier capabilities pre-WWII, the Apollo space program or any time we have had to make difficult decisions knowing that there was a chance that some of our guys/gals might not come back.

That's why your great and revered Hog drivers have been all but been abandoned by the AF, CAS is too dirty and too dangerous. That's why the weak-sister air superiority guys who run the AF don't like getting below 10,000 AGL, when things get a little too dicey for them.
 
DaveGriffin said:
Andy;

I know we are all thankful that you and the 'reduce risk at all costs' AF Puke decision making process was not the prevailing mentality when we were engaged in critical but dangerous endeavors such as the development of Naval Carrier capabilities pre-WWII, the Apollo space program or any time we have had to make difficult decisions knowing that there was a chance that some of our guys/gals might not come back.

That's why your great and revered Hog drivers have been all but been abandoned by the AF, CAS is too dirty and too dangerous. That's why the weak-sister air superiority guys who run the AF don't like getting below 10,000 AGL, when things get a little too dicey for them.

Dave, it's better to keep your trap shut and have everyone think you're an idiot than to open your man-pleaser and confirm it.

Ask Yeager and all those dudes who flew the century-series fighters how safe it was. Further, I like my Hog bros, but I don't think anyone "reveres" them. And it's painfully obvious you know very little about modern CAS operations wrt to the USAF.
 
Didn't take long for this thread to turn into a my Jet blast is bigger, badder than yours....

So much Type A, some much testosterone... Where is a calm cool female B-52 pilot who can do needlepoint while delivering nukes when we need one....

Whether we like it or not, we are counting on guys like you to save us from the world...
 
Last edited:
MAGNUM!! said:
Dave, it's better to keep your trap shut and have everyone think you're an idiot than to open your man-pleaser and confirm it.

Ask Yeager and all those dudes who flew the century-series fighters how safe it was. Further, I like my Hog bros, but I don't think anyone "reveres" them. And it's painfully obvious you know very little about modern CAS operations wrt to the USAF.

Magnum;

Yeager was a different breed from the current-day AF 'reduce risk at all costs'. It would be great if we saw his type again today. Too bad his type in your leadership structure is gone.

Don't delude yourself. Reassigning the A-10's mission to the F-16 is a major mistake. Ask any Grunt on the ground what has the greatest effect on the bad guys: a Hog screaming in at treetop with the DU guns roaring or a prima donna F-16 puke releasing a JDAM from stand-off. Regardless of your desire to be a hot sh*t CAS guy, you can never provide the same level of support as the A-10.

The Gunships and their crews are great. There just aren't enough of them.

The AF Pukes are too focused on air superiority and dropping bombs from 30,000 ft. The war is on the ground.

P.S. When I said the Hog pilots were 'revered', I meant by the guys on the grond, not by Pukes in F-16s.

 
Last edited:
DaveGriffin said:
Magnum;

Yeager was a different breed from the current-day AF 'reduce risk at all costs'. It would be great if we saw his type again today. Too bad his type in your leadership structure is gone.

Don't delude yourself. Reassigning the A-10's mission to the F-16 is a major mistake. Ask any Grunt on the ground what has the greatest effect on the bad guys: a Hog screaming in at treetop with the DU guns roaring or a prima donna F-16 puke releasing a JDAM from stand-off. Regardless of your desire to be a hot sh*t CAS guy, you can never provide the same level of support as the A-10.

The Gunships and their crews are great. There just aren't enough of them.

The AF Pukes are too focused on air superiority and dropping bombs from 30,000 ft. The war is on the ground.

P.S. When I said the Hog pilots were 'revered', I meant by the guys on the grond, not by Pukes in F-16s.


Hey Navy Puke, I'm a big fan of the A-10. However, based on some of your observations, I think you don't really understand how CAS is done these days.

A JDAM does more damage than a 30mm round, no way to dispute that. A 500lb LGB does more damage than a 30mm round. An AGM-65 does more damage than a 30mm round. I spent 3.5 years doing Operational Test on active duty. I can assure you we are not more focused on air SUPREMACY than on dropping bombs (from all altitudes, by the way). We don't have to focus on air-to-air...we own it. The focus on all future combat ops for the USAF is air-to-ground. Why do you think we slapped JDAMs on the Raptor?

Prima Donnas? In the F-16? Do you know any F-16 pilots? Ever worked with 'em? Flown with 'em? I'm all for giving other platforms sh*t, but I think you actually mean some of this stuff, and I think you actually believe it.

There are missions for the Hog and for the Viper. And while the GAU-8 is a great tool, the A-10 employs more effective CAS weapons.
 
DaveGriffin said:
Andy;

I know we are all thankful that you and the 'reduce risk at all costs' AF Puke decision making process was not the prevailing mentality when we were engaged in critical but dangerous endeavors such as the development of Naval Carrier capabilities pre-WWII, the Apollo space program or any time we have had to make difficult decisions knowing that there was a chance that some of our guys/gals might not come back.

That's why your great and revered Hog drivers have been all but been abandoned by the AF, CAS is too dirty and too dangerous. That's why the weak-sister air superiority guys who run the AF don't like getting below 10,000 AGL, when things get a little too dicey for them.

Dave, I don't make up stories of being a Navy Seal with multiple carrier landings. I know what I've done in my flying career, and while it may be mundane to those that really (not made up) have fighter time, nonetheless, I am proud of what I've done. You, on the other hand, must have such a miserable life that you have to make up stories.
I don't for a minute think that an ex-Navy Seal or Carrier Qual'd Pilot would berate others in the manner that you do.

As for getting below 10K ft, been there, done that. I used to love flying low levels on the Rio Grande. As a T-38IP, I can recall (not a made up DaveGriffin story) flying ballz to the wall with another IP through a canyon where we could feel the vibration of the engines bouncing off of the floor. Bert, if you're out there, PM me. Are you going back to UAL when recalled? Your time's coming soon - #8033 is around the corner.
Or the time I was flying the Combat Sent on an operation mission off the coast of a very unfriendly country. The tac coordinator called for a spiral dive. My question- bank limitation? His answer- as much as you can handle. 82 degrees later, we were in an idle descent within all aircraft tolerances (top rudder works wonders in controlling airspeed). Passing 10,000, I slowly reduced bank angle so that we were wings level at 2000 ft. I didn't want to scare 'em too bad, but would've loved to take it down another 1500 feet. The next day, my co topped me with 87 degrees; he executed it flawlessly. The tac coordinator never asked for another tactical descent on that deployment. And yes, the co outflew me.

My stories ain't $hit, but they're real. I don't need to make 'em up. I don't read military aviation novels and then in some twisted DaveGriffin manner think that I was there. You need help.
 
It seems that the AF CAS mission has changed over the years, from support of troops in close contact, into FEBA interdiction, due to the general horror of the inevitable friendly fire casualties from close support without PGM's.

During the gulf war, the A-10 did great work, the vast majority of it, though, far from troops in contact. FEBA interdiction can be defined as destruction of inbound enemy ground forces 5 to 20 miles from friendlies, and this pretty much ensures FF accidents don't happen. The WW2-style vision of fighter-bombers roaring in to save the day, as in Saving Private Ryan, is pretty much gone. The Apache and the Harrier, as well as quick response artillery, fulfills the role much better.

AF air-mud power is best illustrated by the Basra road of death during the first gulf war. With no friendly forces in the vicinity, it was an unbelievably brutal massacre. I had an A-10 buddy who lost count of the number of armored vehicles he destroyed, the vast majority of them with mavericks, not the gun.

JDAM, LGB's, and missiles in general are better weapons than the GAU-8. The Army and the Marines for years have desired their own air-arm devoted to the CAS mission. I'd say, if they want it that bad, let them have it.
 
Jesus, Andy...felt the engines of a 38 off the ground in a canyon? I've been in that canyon in a 38, and if you felt that, you were f---ing up. And if you were that "good" in whatever you were flying at 82 degrees, you should have been a BUFF pilot. You could have done airshows.
Don't try to shut down guys that don't seem to have a clue like Dave with real life heroic stories that show you don't have flight discipline.
 
DaveGriffin said:
Magnum;

Yeager was a different breed from the current-day AF 'reduce risk at all costs'. It would be great if we saw his type again today. Too bad his type in your leadership structure is gone.

Don't delude yourself. Reassigning the A-10's mission to the F-16 is a major mistake. Ask any Grunt on the ground what has the greatest effect on the bad guys: a Hog screaming in at treetop with the DU guns roaring or a prima donna F-16 puke releasing a JDAM from stand-off. Regardless of your desire to be a hot sh*t CAS guy, you can never provide the same level of support as the A-10.

The Gunships and their crews are great. There just aren't enough of them.

The AF Pukes are too focused on air superiority and dropping bombs from 30,000 ft. The war is on the ground.

P.S. When I said the Hog pilots were 'revered', I meant by the guys on the grond, not by Pukes in F-16s.


Most "operators" I got to work with were very quiet reserved guys that kept the mouth shut when they didn't know what they were talking about. I only met a few loud and arrogant types, but they generally knew WTF they were speaking about.

I've been on the line as a Grunt and have had the wonderful men and women put steel on target many a time so I wouldn't go from frying pan to fire. I don't know strategic or tactical air doctrine, but I do know that we Grunts couldn't do our jobs without the aircrews and wars wouldn't be won without the Grunts. The boots on the ground take and hold soil; that means a lot more than a jet over head. However our roles are integral; hence everything is now joint.

Do I think the military is being pussified? Yes I do, but I also know that there will always be those with BIG BRASS ONES that set the example, do the right thing and piss off the pu$$ies. Anyone that has ever worn a uniform knows that.

I have some interesting personal accounts of A-10s, F-15E, F-16s, F/A-18s, AH-1W, AH-64A/D and even the FAST FAC F-14s overhead doing great work. Some even to save my buddies and I. I don't care what it is, a DU from a 20mm or 30mm will kill someone just as dead as a JDAM. All I ask is that the pilot knows how best to employ his/her systems. They've all been great thus far. I will say that AC-130 has the best fireworks display.

I will say with a fair amount of certainty that you, Dave, were never a Grunt and never knew the hardships, misery and great joy that it is to be the Grunt. I am trading my boots for wings and will miss them dearly, but it's time to move to a different part of the battlefield.

Happy and Safe flying to you all, thanks for saving my arse many a time and RLTW!

I'll leave y'all to figure out what unit I was with and with what service.
 
malterf15 said:
Jesus, Andy...felt the engines of a 38 off the ground in a canyon? I've been in that canyon in a 38, and if you felt that, you were f---ing up. And if you were that "good" in whatever you were flying at 82 degrees, you should have been a BUFF pilot. You could have done airshows.
Don't try to shut down guys that don't seem to have a clue like Dave with real life heroic stories that show you don't have flight discipline.

The T-38 ride was definitely busting flight discipline, no question there. Most of us were young and stupid at least once. Old and stupid is a different story.
The 82 degree bank was within all flight regs. At KC-135/B-52 instructor school, they used to have a demo flown by the IPs where they remained in the contact position in 90 degrees of bank.
 
Andy said:
At KC-135/B-52 instructor school, they used to have a demo flown by the IPs where they remained in the contact position in 90 degrees of bank.

WOW!!!!! Got any pics of THAT?!?!?!
 
Andy said:
The 82 degree bank was within all flight regs. At KC-135/B-52 instructor school, they used to have a demo flown by the IPs where they remained in the contact position in 90 degrees of bank.

What was your descent rate while you were doing that?? I'm sorely tempted to call bullsh*it on this one. Got plenty of time on the boom and I can't imagine 90 o' bank during AR ops, no matter what you're flying. Especially if one's a BUFF and the other's a SLUFF. If you did it, I'd like some others to verify this one.
 
After two more beers and some more thought, I'm definitely calling BS. There's no way that happened. Your VVI would be off the charts negative and I don't think either plane could pull enough g's to sustain any kind of contact position whatsoever. No way. And you'd have to be in idle or you'd be at Vne in no time. Anyone here try to fly close formation with lead in idle?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom