Turtle21
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Posts
- 1,683
I'm talking about when the pilot integration is complete.
By necessity one day must be chosen and what better date than when a merger is consummated?I guess you didn't understand what I wrote. The US Airways plan, such as it was, before the merger was to continue shrinking. They were in a self-financed Chap 11 with no plan of reorganization and most analysts expected liquidation shortly. The merger changed that plan so to look at Parker's decisions post-merger and say "See, I told you so" is very disingenuous.
The heck I do. I don't blame them for not liking the Nic list (though their inflated sense of entitlement contributed to their unrealistic expectations) but nothing justifies their attempt to cram down their wet-dream list on the West.And I throw it right back at you. People with integrity live up to their commitments. We agreed to let a neutral decide and he did. It really is that simple and I don't buy any excuses, period.
Did I mention I flew for TWA? The OZ/TW merger still is a point of contention. Icahn made sure the OZ pilots were denied their right to arbitration. The APA and AMR made sure the TWA pilots were denied arbitration. See a pattern here?
I can't tell you how proud I was to experience a fair integration process between AWA and USAir. We met to negotiate as equals. Both sides were able to present our cases to the arbitrator. I had no idea what the result would be but I knew it would be final.Lemme ask you: was it reasonable that the APA got to dictate the seniority integration with TWA? Is it reasonable that the East is trying to do the exact same thing to the West? No double standards, now.
Well, I am trying to convince you of something: that DOH as a fixed integration scheme for pilots is far more likely to be unfair than having neutrals evaluate every merger on its own.Once again when it comes to furloughs fences are no substitute.
No need for looong posts. It was over years ago.