80drvr said:
Actually, I have applied to SWA and JBLU. If this ship sinks and I start over at another airline, I know exactly which part of the list I'll be on.
Of course. If you
quit your airline and go someplace you start at the bottom. If your airline
fails and you go someplace else you start at the bottom. Neither happened to TWA. What
might've happened is a different topic. Technically AA "hired" me in April 2001 but I never quit TWA nor did it go out of business. (As we all know, Chap 11 is not the same at Chap 7 which
is going out of business.) I simply kept going to work and the name on my paystub changed. I also wasn't on probation, hence I was not a new-hire. My
seniority date changed to 2001 but my
hire date remained 1999.
This is a tough industry that uses the Seniority system rather than a Merit system for advancement. Most of the flying public may say "tisk, tisk" about a 1988-hire ex-TWA captain being furloughed while a 1999 AA hire stays but all they care about is the ticket price.
Keep in mind that without so many ex-TWA guys at the bottom it's very likely that "native" AA'ers would've been furloughed in much greater numbers than apparently will occur. This differs from Air-Cal and Reno in that
most of the TWA planes are being kept or replaced while
most of the pilots are furloughed. Native AA'ers will soon be flying ex-TWA metal
en masse, albeit through displacement.
What's the point of all this? The expression "career expectations" is purely rhetorical and meaningless. It's nothing more than a biased personal opinion. The APA stapled approx. 60% of the ex-TWA pilots because they could and because they felt to staple more wouldn't stand up in court. "Fairness" isn't an issue. I'm not going to whine about the Integration, but I object to those trying to justify it. It was just business and I don't take it personally. Unfortunately many are taking it personally and all they'll end up with higher blood pressure and nothing of benefit.