They'll be roughly the same. The job of the President hasn't changed, so neither will the cost of doing business.Care to predict if the expenses of the new President will go UP or DOWN this year?
Thanks for the honest reply. Herein lies out root disagreement, I think.
After all, the hardest workers in the world get paid almost nothing. Be they sweatshop workers in China, or minimum wage Joe's in the US, they work very hard and make almost nothing. Why?
- You argue that because he works hard, he deserves lots of money.
- I argue that he should be paid based on results (excuses don't count for executive level positions), not on how many hours he clocks in.
Because not much is really expected of them. I'd have to say that the President of an organization with a quarter of a billion dollars in cash has A LOT expected of him.
I don't think DW met the bar. One a-holes opinion, of course.
How do you quantify "results" in order to set compensation? I would argue that Duane brought the best results of any President in quite some time. You and many other rank-and-file members would argue differently. How do you quantify this to set compensation? Simply, you can't. That's why it's the job of the BOD to determine compensation and to vote on national Officers. If you have a problem with either, then you talk with your status reps, who are the BOD members, and tell them how you want them to vote. Democracy in action.