Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ALPA is dead!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Redmeat said:
Hey TonyC.

You sound like a young guy.

Before you go tooting your horn about the great choices you've made throughout your illustrious aviation career, keep in mind that there are plenty of older guys getting screwed right now that "chose" their airline when Federal Express had 14 Falcon 20's and a handful of 727's, and was considered a second-tier flying job.

They probably wish they possessed your incredible foresight.

So simmer down there sparky.
I'm not sure if I should take that as an insult or a compliment. I'll opt for the latter for now. :)

I knew about Federal Express back then because it was growing in my own hometown. If I had possessed incredible foresight, I would have joined the TN ANG instead of the Air Force, and I would be a widebody Capt with 20 years under my belt. Instead, I scoffed at the idea of flying purple airplanes in favor of an Air Force career followed by a "real" airline. It wasn't until several years later that I realized what opportunities had been right under my nose.

I'm not bragging about my choices, and I'm not criticizing anybody else's choices. What I'm doing is raising the BS flag to all of this nonsense that the only reason I support ALPA is that I was lucky enough to stumble into the right company at the right time. While I do consider myself lucky to have gotten an offer from my first choice, and I do consider myself lucky to be working for a very profitable company, I don't think either of those facts has any bearing on the discussion at hand. ALPA did not make FedEx profitable, and ALPA will not make FedEx unprofitable. ALPA WILL make it possible for the very best qualified individuals to bargain on my behalf to obtain my fair share of those profits.

As airline pilots we all owe ALPA for years and years of work on our behalf. The rules that govern us today, the compensation we receive, the hours and schedules that we work, the structure of safety that we enjoy... the list goes on and on ... these things that so many of us take for granted would NOT BE THIS WAY were it not for the tireless work of men and women that worked for the profession under the auspices of ALPA.

It's easy to be a coward and sit back and criticize everything you don't like. Who will be a man and stand up with an idea to make things better?

Anyone?




.
 
AA717driver said:
As for HAL and Aloha. Yes, ALPA's lawyers may be preventing you from working for a Mesa-like contract but you can negotiate the pay rates you have without a union--look at AirTran's pay scales.

TC,

Airtran's pilots are represented by an in-house union called the National Pilot's Association (NPA). Their current agreement is the result of that union's hard work and efforts.

-Neal
 
My image of ALPA is that of a bunch of fraternity boys piling into a pickup truck to see a football game, high-fiving each other because they belong to a group.

Meanwhile, Woerth is taking 'em to the cleaners.

Stupid testosterone-gone-awry.

Stupid.

Wake up!
 
Phony Marconi said:
My image of ALPA is that of a bunch of fraternity boys piling into a pickup truck to see a football game, high-fiving each other because they belong to a group.

Meanwhile, Woerth is taking 'em to the cleaners.

Stupid testosterone-gone-awry.

Stupid.

Wake up!

More cockpit and crewroom reflections.... Did you come up with that all by yourself or did you just remember it from the crew lounge cause some jackass said it and got a chuckle out of the rest of 'em?

Look in the mirror.

Before you respond, can you articulate your post in a way that addresses the issues so we can discuss and debate? (Undergraduate would be nice, post graduate would be great)
 
Last edited:
You missed the sarcasm

TonyC said:
I'm not sure if I should take that as an insult or a compliment. I'll opt for the latter for now. :)




.

My comments were neither meant to be compliments nor insults.

My point was that the 50 somethings who are battling for their pensions now in the Legacy World would have been looked upon as being insane to have chosen Federal express over UAL, Delta, NW, etc. in the late 70's-early 80's. It would have been grounds for a psych eval.

Remember Pan Am was once the airline to shoot for, they had the best work rules, best pay, best routes, you name it, they had it. Does anyone remember Pan Am?

Hopefully 25 years from now you won't face the prospect of your expected 6 figure + pension being reduced to 28,000.

Good Luck.
 
Last edited:
Redmeat said:
My comments were neither meant to be compliments nor insults.
I was referring to your comment about my youthfulness. :)

Redmeat said:
My point was that the 50 somethings who are battling for their pensions now in the Legacy World would have been looked upon as being insane to have chosen Federal express over UAL, Delta, NW, etc. in the late 70's-early 80's. It would have been grounds for a psych eval.
And my point is that neither of our choices of airline has any bearing on the discussion at hand. It is folly to dismiss any supporters of ALPA because they were just dumb lucky to be at a profitable carrier, and it would be folly for me to dismiss criticism of ALPA simply because it comes from someone who made a stupid choice. (I'm not saying anybody made a stupid choice - - I'm saying it would be folly if I were to make such an accusation.)




.
 
TonyC said:
I was referring to your comment about my youthfulness. :)

And my point is that neither of our choices of airline has any bearing on the discussion at hand. It is folly to dismiss any supporters of ALPA because they were just dumb lucky to be at a profitable carrier, and it would be folly for me to dismiss criticism of ALPA simply because it comes from someone who made a stupid choice. (I'm not saying anybody made a stupid choice - - I'm saying it would be folly if I were to make such an accusation.)




.

Just to be perfectly clear,

I was not bashing ALPA.

My posts were directed toward your post that I (and many) interpreted to be an insinuation that somehow if some pilots would have made a better choice in airline they could have avoided their current problems.

You seem to be changing your tune a little.

TonyC said:
If the best you guys can do is pretend that guys working for profitable carriers are only there because of dumb luck and that we need to be groveling each day to show our appreciation to the gods of chance, then we don't have much to discuss. It didn't take a 9/11 for some of us to see that express cargo provides a much more stable business than passengers. Rather than credit us with a wise choice, you feel better by crediting us with dumb luck. You had the chance, but you chose the early morning wake-ups and dragging your bags through terminals. We didn't. Get over it.
 
Redmeat said:
My posts were directed toward your post that I (and many) interpreted to be an insinuation that somehow if some pilots would have made a better choice in airline they could have avoided their current problems.

You seem to be changing your tune a little.
My tune hasn't changed, but perhaps I failed to make my point clear initially. It was never my intention to demean anyone's opinion by virtue of their choice of employment. I only tried to say how silly it was for others to demean or dismiss my opinion because of my choice of employment. I apologize if I offended anyone by failing to make that clear.

I do not rejoice in the troubles of others. I am deeply troubled by the forces astir in our industry today. I am concerned not only about the future of my children's, but about that of other extended family members whose future will be affected by, for example, the failure or success of Delta. But I do not think the solution to the problems in Atlanta is to throw out ALPA and start over. ALPA did not manage Delta to where it is now, and it will not manage Delta to where it will be next year or the year after. ALPA will continue to advocate for the pilots, and for that I am grateful. I can't think of a better way to do it, but I'm always open to suggestions.

So, if there's any way that this thread can be turned into a constructive discussion where Real Men of Genius share ideas that will profit the profession and the industry, I'm all for that! Let's leave our company IDs in our pockets and try to offer something intelligent, shall we?





.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top