USCtrojan
KolobWestwind
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2004
- Posts
- 1,942
If that's in reference to Trojan's post, he's an ASA dirtbag too. A damn fine dirtbag, but a dirtbag nonetheless.
Hey I resemble that remark, you ASA Dirtbag!
Trojan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that's in reference to Trojan's post, he's an ASA dirtbag too. A damn fine dirtbag, but a dirtbag nonetheless.
Maybe I can shed a little light on the subject.
I was at a SkyWest ALPA info meeting listening a pilot from the ALASKA ALPA MEC telling this story.
He said that he was in charge of ALPA orientation for new hires at Alaska. When passing out the required forms to sign up for ALPA he met one of our former SkyWest pilots who was a new hire. He asked him a little about the organizing effort at SkyWest and the pilot admitted that he had not sent in his card. The Alaska guy took the opportunity to kind of give the new hire a hard time, asking why he was so willing to sign up for ALPA at Alaska when he was unwilling to send in a card at SkyWest.
At one point he may have even taken the application for ALPA membership from the new hire temporarily. I don't think he was "DENIED" ALPA membership but he was called out to explain the perceived hypocracy (or apathy).
There may have been another incident I am not aware of but this is the one that I am familiar with.
(Lets all do ourselves a favor and let this thread DIE.)
At least that's my opinion.
flyinghunter said:I just don't know what ALPA as a group has done to give regional pilots a better QOL.
Thanks, that sounds a lot like the story I heard.Maybe I can shed a little light on the subject.
I was at a SkyWest ALPA info meeting listening a pilot from the ALASKA ALPA MEC telling this story.
He said that he was in charge of ALPA orientation for new hires at Alaska. When passing out the required forms to sign up for ALPA he met one of our former SkyWest pilots who was a new hire. He asked him a little about the organizing effort at SkyWest and the pilot admitted that he had not sent in his card. The Alaska guy took the opportunity to kind of give the new hire a hard time, asking why he was so willing to sign up for ALPA at Alaska when he was unwilling to send in a card at SkyWest.
At one point he may have even taken the application for ALPA membership from the new hire temporarily. I don't think he was "DENIED" ALPA membership but he was called out to explain the perceived hypocracy (or apathy).
There may have been another incident I am not aware of but this is the one that I am familiar with.
(Lets all do ourselves a favor and let this thread DIE.)
We were told he was denied membership.
I know that it's only as strong as the members, but how does alpa national help me, how would they be different than say teamsters or an inhouse union?
how does alpa national help me, how would they be different than say teamsters or an inhouse union?
Read the magazine.
ALPA "National" particaptes in the international arena. For example the criminalization of pilots, open skies, foreign control, cabatoge, cargo security and safety, aircraft engineering and develpment, etc..
Recently the US/EU deal on open skies was quite contentious... ALPA fought hard for labor to included. Without ALPA "nationals" involvment, the changes that will take place on March 2008 would've been worse...
Let me say first that my political views slant strongly conservative. I feel the market should be allowed to work. BUT, without a counterweight, the market will allow for monopolies and oligopolies. These in turn generate abuses of the folks who make the wheels turns. ALPA is the counterweight which works in our favor.
I hate when ALPA-ites toss the "greedy". We all want ours and it makes this country as successful as it is. But in the end, those on top will drive us into the ground to line their pockets. I don't fault them. I want as much as I can get too but at the very least, we have some sort of legal protections and rights to further our stance.
Most importantly, it gives us a lobby in DC since lobbies make DC's wheels go 'round. The companies have theirs to help them make theirs, why not us.
ALPA ain't perfect but I am thankful it's there.
But it could be so much better..... You don't see UAW members trying to undercut other UAW members..... You do see the UAW negotiate the same accross company lines.....
ALPA has much more potential......
if you are looking at apples to apples with alpa vs uaw...then I'd say the uaw has some serious cabotage issues that alpa, as yet, doesn't have to deal with (toyota, honda, hyundai, VW, etc....)
remember guys, we are all (all airlines) commodities right now. there is nothing in the consumer's mind other than price. it's the truth and the sooner we realize it, the better....
Mookie
I'm more worried about Mesa than the Chinese.... Let's deal with ALPA members undercutting ALPA members first..... then we can focus on cabotage.... Deal with the current emergency before you start to worry about the next one.....