waveflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Posts
- 10,005
It's simple math. Our pilot group is 25% the size of yours. The 32% removed from us equals 8% gain on your side.
Most of us lose here lose around 32%. The exception is the group at the bottom hired after 2008, who lose zero.
For example I go from being at 29% (from the top) to 61%, which puts me with guys hired almost 4 years after I was.
The protection in ATL only applied to the 40% of our pilot group that would not have been displaced. Even at 29% on our seniority list, I would not be able to hold ATL.
It is simple math Ty- bc we've been around for 40 years- our senior pilots were hired in the 70's- we have almost 1600 pilots hired by 1996- so if you got your wet dream of DOH those 1600 pilots hired before you existed represent 25% of Swapa pilots and over 20% of the combined 7800.
So what you really lost was 12%- and only in current terms- you're so much younger that as our pilots retire, that number gets smaller. as the smaller company, making less, screwed up mgmt- that wasn't a bad deal.
IMO. But then again, I work here and know how good I have it.
So it ideological- I think losing 4-6 years is about right- where you guys don't. Ok
But it's also mathematical- and that's where you guys have bought into a statistical lie- I don't see how you'll improve on the proposed list by much even at arby- so what you did was throw away all the protections and pay bumps, jeopardize the whole integration, for the possibility of 3-6% more than what was offered. That's not fantastic logic.
IMO