Fly-By-Cable
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2001
- Posts
- 515
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Knowing that your an AT pilot , I find it interesting that you call our CEO a Paper Tiger AKA. ( Puzzy). I know lear70 thinks this also along with several others. I guess time will tell if you guys are correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by On Your Six
SWAPA will probably give in when they notice that GK can't do anything about the binding award, and would have to be very careful dealing with the AT pilots.
OYS
Maybe I have TOO much faith in GK, but I'm betting that he forces both sides back to the table at mediation next week, despite how irritated everyone is right now, and pushes them to find a middle ground.
Where the heck do you get THAT idea? Find ONE post where I said that... Hint: you won't find it.Knowing that your an AT pilot , I find it interesting that you call our CEO a Paper Tiger AKA. ( Puzzy). I know lear70 thinks this also along with several others. I guess time will tell if you guys are correct.
I don't think it was meant to be contradictory. I understand frustration on behalf of SWAPA, and maybe that was part of it.
According to our MC, SWAPA would not budge on the list and our guys walked out of negotiations. They were heading home as GK called them in to see if there is anything could be done to fix it. They respectfully agreed to try. He proposed his protections and restrictions. However our MC kept referencing to the bad list. GK looked at SWAPA. They moved a few numbers and said it was final. GK tried to make things work for both parties. Our MC felt that in a standstill with SWAPA and with GK's good efforts this would be the absolute best that could ever be negotiated at the table.
The last thing our MEC knew about the status of negotiations was that the MC walked out and was on the way home. The "emergency" meeting with GK was not communicated to MEC until after the fact due to timing and the nature of talks. The MC was cornered into agreeing to the proposal with no attorneys present, or MEC approval. (rest assured that will never be allowed again)
This started a disconnect between MC and MEC. Pilots never gave a bird to GK, in fact the opposite, we appreciate his effort to fix the list with protections.
It took MEC longer than SWAPA to vote, because while SL9 provided SWAPA with necessary adjustments to their CBA, the equivalent of SL9 still had to be drafted and approved by legal on our side, for our CBA along with other transitional documents that SWAPA didn't have to have to vote.
AirTran pilots were outraged with SWAPA's refusal to negotiate a fair list. The list is what this thing was about. The list you offered, not GK. He wasn't just helping us, he was helping you, because he knows you'll get crushed in arbitration. Now he can't say that he didn't try.
Don't tell me GK is mad at us... He knows the whole story, not just the propaganda SWAPA put out for you to cover up how THEY caused you to go to arbitration.
As a 6 yr f/o, to have 250+ junior to me flying as captain for the next 10 or so years,
So you are voting for Michelle Bachmann? Interesting choice. I hope that works out for you Fudgepacker.......
She's a crazed lunatic. It's nice that we can agree on something.
Simply put there is NO WAY Gary will let this turn in to a USAir type siuation - Best of luck guys - and I mean that...
Again, my fault for attempting to use ironic humor. It only works for people of average intelligence or greater. I'm not surprised you completely missed it.
Amen. And she's still the GOP frontrunner.
Agreed. Mr. Kelly will take the arbitrated list, implement it and tell the SWA guys to STFU. Because he doesn't give a fig about Sacha's "career expectations."
He has an airline to run and KNOWS a pickleball revolt from the canyon bluehards will hopelessly fragment the operation. Fortunately, he's smarter than his average f/o.
As a 6 yr f/o, to have 250+ junior to me flying as captain for the next 10 or so years, and to have someone with my same date of hire at ATN make two years more pay at MY company is no longer acceptable...
You're saying that there are 250 5th year AirTran Captains ..... ?
implement it and tell the SWA guys to STFU. Because he doesn't give
The only thing more classless than revealing information from the negotiating table is revealing partial and misleading information combined with outright lies.
This attempt to rewrite history is beyond tacky. I will not respond in kind, however I will offer the following FACTS:
- The Seniority List Agreement was reached during direct pilot to pilot negotiations (no lawyers)
- Governance from both unions was fully briefed and aware of the proposals at the table.
- The MEC and MC were in constant contact throughout the negotiation, including when the Agreement in Principle was reached.
- The deal was negotiated fairly and in good faith
- The decision to reject it was the MEC's.
The disinformation and spin from AirTran ALPA needs to stop. It is damaging to the process and is unprofessional. Knock it off.
Rob Zerbe
According to our MC, SWAPA would not budge on the list and our guys walked out of negotiations. They were heading home as GK called them in to see if there is anything could be done to fix it. They respectfully agreed to try. He proposed his protections and restrictions. However our MC kept referencing to the bad list. GK looked at SWAPA. They moved a few numbers and said it was final. GK tried to make things work for both parties. Our MC felt that in a standstill with SWAPA and with GK's good efforts this would be the absolute best that could ever be negotiated at the table.
The last thing our MEC knew about the status of negotiations was that the MC walked out and was on the way home. The "emergency" meeting with GK was not communicated to MEC until after the fact due to timing and the nature of talks. The MC was cornered into agreeing to the proposal with no attorneys present, or MEC approval. (rest assured that will never be allowed again)
This started a disconnect between MC and MEC. Pilots never gave a bird to GK, in fact the opposite, we appreciate his effort to fix the list with protections.
It took MEC longer than SWAPA to vote, because while SL9 provided SWAPA with necessary adjustments to their CBA, the equivalent of SL9 still had to be drafted and approved by legal on our side, for our CBA along with other transitional documents that SWAPA didn't have to have to vote.
AirTran pilots were outraged with SWAPA's refusal to negotiate a fair list. The list is what this thing was about. The list you offered, not GK. He wasn't just helping us, he was helping you, because he knows you'll get crushed in arbitration. Now he can't say that he didn't try.
Don't tell me GK is mad at us... He knows the whole story, not just the propaganda SWAPA put out for you to cover up how THEY caused you to go to arbitration.
Once again, proven a liar, nice work, you guys should try some honesty once in awhile. Good for the soul, like chicken soup.According to our MC, SWAPA would not budge on the list and our guys walked out of negotiations. They were heading home as GK called them in to see if there is anything could be done to fix it. They respectfully agreed to try. He proposed his protections and restrictions. However our MC kept referencing to the bad list. GK looked at SWAPA. They moved a few numbers and said it was final. GK tried to make things work for both parties. Our MC felt that in a standstill with SWAPA and with GK's good efforts this would be the absolute best that could ever be negotiated at the table.
The last thing our MEC knew about the status of negotiations was that the MC walked out and was on the way home. The "emergency" meeting with GK was not communicated to MEC until after the fact due to timing and the nature of talks. The MC was cornered into agreeing to the proposal with no attorneys present, or MEC approval. (rest assured that will never be allowed again)
This started a disconnect between MC and MEC. Pilots never gave a bird to GK, in fact the opposite, we appreciate his effort to fix the list with protections.
It took MEC longer than SWAPA to vote, because while SL9 provided SWAPA with necessary adjustments to their CBA, the equivalent of SL9 still had to be drafted and approved by legal on our side, for our CBA along with other transitional documents that SWAPA didn't have to have to vote.
AirTran pilots were outraged with SWAPA's refusal to negotiate a fair list. The list is what this thing was about. The list you offered, not GK. He wasn't just helping us, he was helping you, because he knows you'll get crushed in arbitration. Now he can't say that he didn't try.
Don't tell me GK is mad at us... He knows the whole story, not just the propaganda SWAPA put out for you to cover up how THEY caused you to go to arbitration.
Not sure what you're hearing about arbitration from SWAPA, but here's what Dana Eischen wrote. He was on the board of this decision at DAL/NWA. He will be our lead arbitrator.
'We have attempted, at all times, to recognize reasonable expectations of both parties while, in all instances, rejecting proposals that, however facially logical, resulted in untenable windfalls.'
'The resulting list neither realizes nor maintains each and every career expectations, nor could it do so. No recitation of career expectations ever includes a merger, and no merger can leave all hopes and plans unaffected. The most that can be said, and it can be said with some assurance in this case, is that the merger of these particular companies will result in a uniquely powerful entity, by virtue of the contributions of both carriers, that is capable of better withstanding the substantial challenges of the current environment than if the Companies had chose to go it alone.'
Just out of curiosity, how will SWA pilots react when this mess is all over?
Obviously, the likely outcome is arbitration. Both sides will complain, but in the end we will integrate and move on. How will SWA guys respond? Will we all shake hands and move on, or will some of these guys hold a serious grudge?
So since your part of the AT MEC or NC, why don't you atlest have the ballz to tell us your name, Rob Zerbe has. It is sad that ALPA could care less for the well-being of the AT pilots.
No, I believe the real question is how will SWA pilots react to the arbitration award. The AT pilots' reaction is pretty obvious; they have already said they will accept it, whatever the outcome. And that will be the end of it.I think the question should be asked, how will SWA and AT. React. Why would you assume only SWA pilots will have a response ?
I believe the answer lies ,of what alpa has put out to the AT pilots.
I think the question should be asked, how will SWA and AT. React. Why would you assume only SWA pilots will have a response ?
I believe the answer lies ,of what alpa has put out to the AT pilots.
No, I believe the real question is how will SWA pilots react to the arbitration award. The AT pilots' reaction is pretty obvious; they have already said they will accept it, whatever the outcome. And that will be the end of it.
But what about the SWA pilots? How will they respond to an arbitration award and subsequent integration that they obviously aren't going to like? Will they be ready to move on, or will they be bitter and try to create a hostile work environment for their new coworkers? In fairness to SWA, most of the guys I've met in person have been quite reasonable, but let's face it, there are a lot of angry SWA guys here on this board threatening to hold a serious grudge. Just look at the post below your own, with it's threats to carry the fight on indefinitely in the cockpit. Does this represent the views of a majority of SWA pilots, or just an angry few?
Lowrider717;2199126 I lament that they way we handle this NOW portends HOW we will handle the future!
No, I believe the real question is how will SWA pilots react to the arbitration award. The AT pilots' reaction is pretty obvious; they have already said they will accept it, whatever the outcome. And that will be the end of it.
AT pilots would certainly have no reason to be angry after a favorable arbitration award.Is that YOUR position or that of ALPA?
Gup