Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Air Wisconsin

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
DDiggler,

I don't know who you are, but your remarks towards some of your AWAC peers posting here makes me think you are either management or very junior. Maybe the first thing you can do to understand what myself and others who are simply fed up is to get your hands on an original copy of contract '99. See what we gave up on the basis of a bunch of LIES promoted by management. Secondly, look around. You may be one of the priviledged few to live in domicile. I know what that is like, I lived in domicile for my entire time with this company until USAIR started. And although I don't like the commute, I can live with it. The problem lies in requiring hotels on BOTH ends of a trip. Get's a little pricey, even on CA pay.

As far as our pay scales being too expensive? The company posted a 20.9 Million dollar profit for every quarter since the concessions took effect. The concessions save the company about 5 million per quarter. Think they can't afford to operate without them? RRRRIIIGGGHHHTTTT! they just can't buy the 75 foot yatch, they can only get the 50 foot one. And who's business is it of anyones how much we cost (as a group) to a prospective airline? All that should matter is the end price.

The point is that we provide a superior product (or used to, I not convinced we do anymore). And that product was brought forward by the employees of AWAC. But with the way we are now being treated by Management, it's no wonder why things are falling apart. All any of us who have been here awhile are trying to do for the new arrivals is give them an honest opinion of what is REALLY going on here, not the polished version promted by HR and the recruiting staff.

Rekks
 
hi,
from what I gathered, awac invested 13.5 % into Us airways, and is gonna stop its United flying.

1)Is us airways gonna be the only airline partner? how is the loss of united flying going to affect AWAC?

Also , I read here that Air wisky is looking at having 1100 pilots, if i am correct that corresponds to 110 planes. I also read that the hiring was due to attrition not expansion. On ailrinepilotpay.com, the amount of CRJ is only 70. the amount of bae (being pahsed out anyway ) is/was 17.
even if the BAE are replaced by crj thats only 87 planes, hence 870 pilots not 1100.
2) So expansion as well or only attrition?

can somebody explain?thanks
 
hi,
from what I gathered, awac invested 13.5 % into Us airways, and is gonna stop its United flying.

1)Is us airways gonna be the only airline partner? how is the loss of united flying going to affect AWAC?

Also , I read here that Air wisky is looking at having 1100 pilots, if i am correct that corresponds to 110 planes. I also read that the hiring was due to attrition not expansion. On ailrinepilotpay.com, the amount of CRJ is only 70. the amount of bae (being pahsed out anyway ) is/was 17.
even if the BAE are replaced by crj thats only 87 planes, hence 870 pilots not 1100.
2) So expansion as well or only attrition?

can somebody explain?thanks
 
saviboy said:
hi,
from what I gathered, awac invested 13.5 % into Us airways, and is gonna stop its United flying.

1)Is us airways gonna be the only airline partner? how is the loss of united flying going to affect AWAC?

Yes, as of right now, after Feb. 2006 US Air is the only codeshare for CRJ's and after April 2006 United will no longer be a codeshare partner when the remaining 146's stop service. Also, AWAC didn't just "stop" united services. United canceled the contract, and outsourced the flying mostly to skywest and mesa.

Also , I read here that Air wisky is looking at having 1100 pilots, if i am correct that corresponds to 110 planes. I also read that the hiring was due to attrition not expansion.
can somebody explain?thanks

The rumors I've heard went like this: the company came out and said they felt an adequate staffing level was around 1100 pilots as of right now. I'm not sure if that includes the 146 aircraft or not, however. The hiring right now is ONLY due to attrition, there hasn't been any expansion in recent times (in fact, going the other way with the loss of the 146's) and currently the company has no plans for additional aircraft from what they've said. However they are private and as such don't have to disclose anything until it's already happened.
 
United canceled the contract, and outsourced the flying mostly to skywest and mesa.

so, do u think the us airways flying is gonna be enough to compensate th eloss of united flying?


The rumors I've heard went like this: the company came out and said they felt an adequate staffing level was around 1100 pilots as of right now. I'm not sure if that includes the 146 aircraft or not, however. The hiring right now is ONLY due to attrition, there hasn't been any expansion in recent times (in fact, going the other way with the loss of the 146's) and currently the company has no plans for additional aircraft from what they've said. [/quote]

If the 146's are not being replaced , thats only 70 CRJ for 1100 pilots. does that sound right?
 
saviboy said:
United canceled the contract, and outsourced the flying mostly to skywest and mesa.

so, do u think the us airways flying is gonna be enough to compensate th eloss of united flying?

Every one of our RJ's was/is placed in the US Air system.


If the 146's are not being replaced , thats only 70 CRJ for 1100 pilots. does that sound right?

I have no idea. Sounds a little high to me too, but who knows. Right now we are really short on people, hence why we are hiring so many. It should continue as attrition will only increase in the coming months. If you're wondering if we will furlough after the united flying is done I would say that is the furthest thing from their minds right now...

~wheelsup
 
saviboy said:
United canceled the contract, and outsourced the flying mostly to skywest and mesa.

so, do u think the us airways flying is gonna be enough to compensate th eloss of united flying?


The rumors I've heard went like this: the company came out and said they felt an adequate staffing level was around 1100 pilots as of right now. I'm not sure if that includes the 146 aircraft or not, however. The hiring right now is ONLY due to attrition, there hasn't been any expansion in recent times (in fact, going the other way with the loss of the 146's) and currently the company has no plans for additional aircraft from what they've said.
If the 146's are not being replaced , thats only 70 CRJ for 1100 pilots. does that sound right?[/quote]

Though the 146 is leaving, the company is increasing staffing levels due to attrition AND increased utilization of the CRJ fleet. I believe aircraft utilization has gone up almost 15% from United to US Airways... and when combined with people leaving as they are this is leading to the company being short staffed. The company has indicated that with the new utilization when things pan out they wish to see 1100 pilots on the seniority list.
 
better lines hopefully......not as many of those early shows and late trips back to base

i could be (and am most likely) completely wrong though
 
That sounds great! What makes you think that is going to happen though?
 
just seems to make sense.....schedules aren't the greatest right now.....and since we don't appear to be getting any new jets anytime soon...more people would lighten the load for all involved
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom