Bringupthebird
Grumpy? Who-Me?
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2006
- Posts
- 2,182
You know that none of what you wrote is true.Hi General,
At worst USAPA served the East pilot group well by preserving seniority and growth on the East side for what will be at least 10 years and 3 months. Many of those pilots who would have been most affected will retire without having to endure the Nic award.
The top 500 pilots voted to protect their first officers and junior pilots.
The seniority and movement that would have otherwise been lost more than makes up for the loss of pay. Objectively, the loss of pay may also have positioned US Airways well for a merger.
First, by taking on the task of Representitive, it must represent ALL US pilots, not just those it sides with.
Secondly, under the NIC, your statement regarding growth only applies to those pilots who were furloughed at the time of the merger. The bulk of the pilots would have seen upgrades and advancement at very much the same rate, only many years earlier.
Thirdly, the senior pilots had no way to know that the folks they were helping would be so selfish, that they would subject them to BK wages for the remainder of their career in pursuit of an illegal seniority grab.
Lastly, had USAPA never been birthed, US may have been in a much stronger position and may have been able to expand as much or more than the merger provides, with all of the benefits going to the US pilots.
I know that you admit to yourself that you wish USAPA had failed in its representation bid. And now for all their failure, they want to extort an additional $2 million from its pilots to cover their poor decision to squander that same amount in legal fees for nothing.
Please retire or quit the industry and put an end to spread of the effects of your poor shortsighted decisions.
EAST PILOTS = LORENZO