At least you admit to some reality. You would have been downgraded and been a FO in your base (not displaced from base, because as FO, you'd be senior enough).Not quite... I would have been temporarily downgraded but certainly NOT pushed out of base, in fact I would have remained very senior as FO on the 900 IN my base, and once the flows went I would have returned to my position and likely moved up slightly... Now thanks to the Colgan windfall, I'm looking at a displacement out of base to hold captain temporarily til that base closes then back to FO I go with HUNDREDS of others now ahead of me for (re) upgrade.
Look dicknob, you aren't the only one getting the "jobbing" without the G.D. courtesy of a reach around here. Yes our "lifers" came out like roses, Damn near every Colgan pilot won as well, that left the rest of us to send out a shotgun of resumes.... Not the first time I have had to do so, probably won't be the last. If you want some help putting yours together, and can do so in civility while buying the first round, I'll be happy to help. I'll buy the rest in fact (til I lose my pay).
No, there are different types of speculation. The speculation I was doing was figuring out how many of your pilots would be furloughed and downgraded when the Saabs were all parked by the end of the year. This isn't hard, you already have staffing ratios published, and a list of all current Saab pilots. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the rest. Pretty straightforward, hardly what I'd call a speculation. But forecasting future potential business, like 10 CRJs from ASA or others, is all 100% pure speculation with absolutely no grounds for proving it.bri said:We also lost the flow for most on our list. We would have had more than a good shot at getting those 10 700's from ASA, not to mention all 3 of the 200's that Pinnacle lost (which could have been more if Delta have pity because of this merger debacle). Sure, it's all speculation, but so is you saying "so and so" would be right seat when all the Saabs were gone.
Given this SLI and its C&R, all Pinnalce pilots, and I do mean all Pinnacle pilots, would have done better as a stand-alone group. Merging with a shrinking airline and biased quotas have hosed this pilot group. Alas, it cannot be changed (which is BS), but we can request clarification from Bloch on certain things. I love how all you Mesaba folks talk smack on our group (esp our merger committee) that we screwed ourselves by talking down on Saabs, and how we refused to acknowledge Saabs. That's not true. Our group only stated that the Saabs at Mesaba were being reduced to zero, and that we needed to account for that in the SLI process. No comment was made on Colgan's Saabs. I can understand if Bloch wants to keep 9E off the Mesaba Saabs, but there is no reason why 9E can't bid to Colgan Saabs. Why not? Colgan can bid our jets as long as our quotas are met, why shouldn't we be able to bid their Saabs once their quotas are met? He should be clarifying up this point. And I do like how most of you XJ people here scream to "live with it" and "move on" when it doesn't effect you. The double-screwing of displacing our Captains in the 1700s while Colgan awards Captains 600+ numbers junior to that is hardly a "fair and equitable" integration. No one got hosed more on the last vacancy than the Pinnacle pilot group.Well, you will get one back by default because it already went to us. My point is, if this merger never happened, things may have been looked at different. Instead of 2 going to ASA, which sounds like they are in the same boat as us staffing wise, they may have gone to Mesaba and you may not have gotten any of them back. Again, speculation, but so are a lot of things we are talking about.