Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

2 -v- 1 (close call with a Viper)

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
TCASII operates on both distance and closure rates. The 16 had to be within a few hundred feet to set off an RA. Anytime someone points a weapon at me, I consider that aggressive, not so much the maneuver. Having said that, if I'm in an active MOA, it would not be unexpected to have a weapon pointed at me. If I had an RA screaming for a 3000fpm climb, I would absolutely react as trained and follow the RA if I couldn't gain a visual immediately. I've only had one RA, and it required only a few hundred fpm climb. A 3000fpm RA would indicate a significant closure rate and impending collision.
 
Having said that, if I'm in an active MOA, it would not be unexpected to have a weapon pointed at me. If I had an RA screaming for a 3000fpm climb, I would absolutely react as trained and follow the RA if I couldn't gain a visual immediately. I've only had one RA, and it required only a few hundred fpm climb. A 3000fpm RA would indicate a significant closure rate and impending collision.

Other unknowns: did the civvy pilot overreact? I understand being a bit flustered, but perhaps he had other options available. For example, did he ever have the F-16 in sight? If so, was lateral maneuvering then an option, instead of continuing the climb into the Class A?

Once again, none of us was there, so much of this topic is pure speculation hindered by preconceived perceptions.
 
for you.... not aggressive...

to a civ pilot..... yes... and that is what this is about....


And a competent civilian pilot should understand that while operating in an active MOA, there might be a little "aggressive" maneuvering going on...but again, you would need a certain level of competence.

Diesel...

I doubt he got much more than a sit down. You need to learn how the military works.
 
The term joint use tends to escape some people.

When you start flying civilian again or in the future you'll understand how serious an RA is. Maybe if the DHL flight and the russian airliner had there wouldn't be bodies all over eastern europe.

I do bet though after the press coverage this got the military pilot is at a radio listening post somewhere close to the north pole.


Many military pilots fly civilian to and know well what an RA is. . .and that pilot is flying a viper in a MOA somewhere. . .you're an idiot
 
for you.... not aggressive...

to a civ pilot..... yes... and that is what this is about....


actually its about a civilian in a MILITARY operating area. . . .


NOT a military dude in a CIVILIAN operating area. . .If he had made that manuever in class B airspace, you might have a point. .
 
I do bet though after the press coverage this got the military pilot is at a radio listening post somewhere close to the north pole

There are several casinos down here that would love to see you come through the front door. Methinks you've watched one or two movies too many.
 
Other unknowns: did the civvy pilot overreact? I understand being a bit flustered, but perhaps he had other options available. For example, did he ever have the F-16 in sight? If so, was lateral maneuvering then an option, instead of continuing the climb into the Class A?

No. Lateral maneuvers are not an option. TCAS RA's only give vertical escape maneuvers. It seems that many MIL (not all) don't understand TCAS and how it works... A 3000fpm climb is very aggressive for a CIV aircraft of that type...

Once again, none of us was there, so much of this topic is pure speculation hindered by preconceived perceptions.

That is the whole point... the CIV pilot didn't know, so he had to follow the RA... pretty concerning stuff for a CIV guy, with a low energy aircraft and no ejection seat...

We also know that the MIL pilot was reprimanded.... at a minimum he made the DoD look bad...
 
Other unknowns: did the civvy pilot overreact? I understand being a bit flustered, but perhaps he had other options available. For example, did he ever have the F-16 in sight? If so, was lateral maneuvering then an option, instead of continuing the climb into the Class A?

No. Lateral maneuvers are not an option. TCAS RA's only give vertical escape maneuvers. It seems that many MIL (not all) don't understand TCAS and how it works... A 3000fpm climb is very aggressive for a CIV aircraft of that type...

Once again, none of us was there, so much of this topic is pure speculation hindered by preconceived perceptions.

That is the whole point... the CIV pilot didn't know, so he had to follow the RA... pretty concerning stuff for a CIV guy, with a low energy aircraft and no ejection seat...

We also know that the MIL pilot was reprimanded.... at a minimum he made the DoD look bad...

Having a trained killer aggressively chasing TWO CIV aircraft that pose no national security threat with a warplane is not good....
 
I do bet though after the press coverage this got the military pilot is at a radio listening post somewhere close to the north pole.


I think the squadron commander found the pilot in the squadron bar, "Hey lieutenant, we told public affairs that you got reprimanded for that PA mess the other day, so, umm, you're reprimanded. And next time you do that you should turn off your mode 3 like I do. Here, have another beer. Remember, tell anybody that asks that you've been reprimanded."

OK, probably not. Diesel is probably closer to right, but it's what I think should have happened.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top