say again
I love her ARSE!!!!
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Posts
- 4,006
Packers 17 Dallas 7. It's November again.
Dallas bites!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Packers 17 Dallas 7. It's November again.
It's kind of funny. So many on Flight Info said they were against changing the retirement age for so many reasons and that they were never going to work past age 60, even if the law changed; but, in the end they are all untrue to those positions as I see almost no one is retiring at age-60. That means all those outspoken members of this Board who so loudly spoke against changing the age are hypocrites as they betrayed what they vocally advocated. Right? Or do I somehow have that wrong?
Yea, I know you're going to say that nowadays they have to work because of the lousy industry and their personal financial situations. But isn't that what those who wanted to work past age-60 said too; and, wasn't that said to be unacceptagle because those pilots should have planned better, never had 3 wives, etc, etc, etc.
This is really funny to see how people's tunes change as it's apparently only about themselves and money.
The sooner the "now" generation gets on down the road the closer the FO's are to retirement themselves.
Feel free to search my posts over the years and you'll see I've never waivered from fighting AGAINST raising the retirement. Plus I've always said it and I still mean it -
The day I can quit without taking a paycut I'm long gone!
Gup
Gup: With all the double negatives I'm not exactly sure what you've said. But I think you said that you will be working to age-65 because you can not afford to retire will less money than when you're working. Right?
And you were always in favor of raising the retirement age. Right?
It's kind of funny. So many on Flight Info said they were against changing the retirement age for so many reasons and that they were never going to work past age 60, even if the law changed; but, in the end they are all untrue to those positions as I see almost no one is retiring at age-60. That means all those outspoken members of this Board who so loudly spoke against changing the age are hypocrites as they betrayed what they vocally advocated. Right? Or do I somehow have that wrong?
Yea, I know you're going to say that nowadays they have to work because of the lousy industry and their personal financial situations. But isn't that what those who wanted to work past age-60 said too; and, wasn't that said to be unacceptagle because those pilots should have planned better, never had 3 wives, etc, etc, etc.
This is really funny to see how people's tunes change as it's apparently only about themselves and money.
Their still here. (wrong word)
You are correct. All the old guys lied.
It's the old guys and the young guys like you who are just full of BS and don't even know it. You for example have said you're out of here at 62. That is not a lie but it is most likely not correct unless you are Nosterdamus. The reality is that all the captains tell the F/O's that they are going to retire at 62. That is pure BS with maybe a sliver of truth as in wishful dreaming. The truth is that they don't want to piss their F/o's off by saying they're going to be there for 5 more years; tough luck for you. When age 62 comes around they will always have an excuse about some hard luck story. That time is coming up starting this December. Get ready for the stories. Very few (exept maybe at AA where they still have a pension or maybe a guy with a communte from hell) are going to retire before age-65. Why would they?
Point out where I said I was out of here at 62.
How am I full of B.S.?
All ours said, "I'm done at 62." Their still here.