Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA going against McCaskill Bond?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Eastern went out of business because Eastern failed for many reasons. Neither the citizens of Atlanta or Delta were the culprits of that debackle, nor could they have saved Eastern.

SWA, unlike Eastern, strives to maintain a certain culture and public persona with the traveling public. It's an integral part of their marketing strategy. SWA wants to succeed in this competitive environment. In order to do that they need all parties striving to make SWA thrive. OTOH, Lorenzo could have cared less about Eastern, and not much more for Continental. While I can appreciate where your cynical and bitter attitude comes from, in this instance, it misses the mark.

My friend, you are unable to see the similarity in the chess moves. I drew similar comparisons to Eastern well before reading Sacha's post.

You and many other trannies discount the worst possible outcome for yourselves because you think that AirTran's operations and personnel are critical to a successful outcome for Southwest in ATL. They're not. You, me, everyone on this board is completely dispensible. There is a backup plan in Dallas and it's being put in motion. The Southwest flights into ATL starting next Feb should've been a clue to you guys. Do you really think the announcement was a coincidence? So you guys have until next Feb to pass a less desirable SLI or all integration/single operating certificate efforts will come to a screeching halt.
Think about it. They were pushing for a single operating certificate next March. Your MEC kills SL9. GK flies into Atlanta and announces Southwest service starting in Feb. Connect the dots; this isn't rocket science.
Southwest already has what they wanted - a large presence in ATL. ATL was the largest city in the US where no Southwest aircraft flew.
Southwest's operation is very different than traditional hub and spoke carriers so it will probably be easier and more cost effective to simply grow within the Southwest subsidiary than to integrate AirTran's operations into Southwest. Quite frankly, I find the complexity of their operation to be mind boggling but they have figured out how to maximize O/D traffic efficiency using their business model.
If you think that they can't grow ATL internally, you must not have watched what happened after they entered the DEN market.

What I find so disturbing in all of this is that the AirTran pilots think that Southwest management's bluffing. As far as I know, they've never bluffed. But they're going to start now? Seriously? You really need to read this interview: http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/08/gary-kelly-talks-about-airtran-1.html
You guys are committing seppuku and aren't even cognizant of that fact.
 
I believe if this evidence was to go to court it would show that SWA never intended to give the pilots of Airtran a fair shake..

I would say the opposite could be argued. Gary and SWAPA made every effort to garner a good deal. He can sit back now and say 'Look, I tried to give them the best deal we could, but they turned it down'. No one, and I mean NO ONE on the SWAPA side has drug their feet like the ALPA crowd.

Gary has perfect cover to now run both companies seperately. Are you surprised that he threw out the 'economic turmoil'? Southwest pilots have been saying he would play that card, but we were all dismissed as 'fear mongering'. How this has played out is absolutely no surprise.

Even the ALPA response letter was still out in left field. I don't see any indication that Gary won't run them seperately at this point.
 
Eastern went out of business because Eastern failed for many reasons. Neither the citizens of Atlanta or Delta were the culprits of that debackle, nor could they have saved Eastern.

SWA, unlike Eastern, strives to maintain a certain culture and public persona with the traveling public. It's an integral part of their marketing strategy. SWA wants to succeed in this competitive environment. In order to do that they need all parties striving to make SWA thrive. OTOH, Lorenzo could have cared less about Eastern, and not much more for Continental. While I can appreciate where your cynical and bitter attitude comes from, in this instance, it misses the mark.

Where did I say the citizens of Atlanta or Delta were the culprits? How this: Nobody is going to give a damn about the supposed unfairness to the Airtran pilots in the General Public or how it turns out. Are you with the Fed? Ben is that you? Timmy Geithner? Is that you too? Your living in a world of make believe and fantasy. Sorry.
 
If GK did shut down AT, it would be about 6 months before most people forgot that they existed. They would be just one of the many casualties in the airline business. Yes, there would be an initial cry...but in the end people will travel and people will "convert" to SWA (or Delta).
 
What would the board of directors tell GK if he states SWA is losing money because of those lack of synergies? What about the stock holders at the annual stockholders meeting? I bet they will tell him to fix it, and fix it quick. They want PROFITS, not turmoil. This is starting to smell like the next USair, and that smells worse than Redflyer's last deposit at the ELP Airport La Quinta.



OYS

How about you tell him to fix it.
 
My friend, you are unable to see the similarity in the chess moves. I drew similar comparisons to Eastern well before reading Sacha's post.

You and many other trannies discount the worst possible outcome for yourselves because you think that AirTran's operations and personnel are critical to a successful outcome for Southwest in ATL. They're not. You, me, everyone on this board is completely dispensible. There is a backup plan in Dallas and it's being put in motion. The Southwest flights into ATL starting next Feb should've been a clue to you guys. Do you really think the announcement was a coincidence? So you guys have until next Feb to pass a less desirable SLI or all integration/single operating certificate efforts will come to a screeching halt.
Think about it. They were pushing for a single operating certificate next March. Your MEC kills SL9. GK flies into Atlanta and announces Southwest service starting in Feb. Connect the dots; this isn't rocket science.
Southwest already has what they wanted - a large presence in ATL. ATL was the largest city in the US where no Southwest aircraft flew.
Southwest's operation is very different than traditional hub and spoke carriers so it will probably be easier and more cost effective to simply grow within the Southwest subsidiary than to integrate AirTran's operations into Southwest. Quite frankly, I find the complexity of their operation to be mind boggling but they have figured out how to maximize O/D traffic efficiency using their business model.
If you think that they can't grow ATL internally, you must not have watched what happened after they entered the DEN market.

What I find so disturbing in all of this is that the AirTran pilots think that Southwest management's bluffing. As far as I know, they've never bluffed. But they're going to start now? Seriously? You really need to read this interview: http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/08/gary-kelly-talks-about-airtran-1.html
You guys are committing seppuku and aren't even cognizant of that fact.

More threats and attempts at intimidation, nothing more. The Airtran pilots should stay on the high road and not worry about the boogey man. Why so much fear of a fair and equitable seniority integration? If SWAPA truly felt confident in their position they wouldn't be running around kissing up to management and trying to bully the Airtran pilots out of their right to a fair and equitable integration. Sooner or later SWAPA/SWA (is there really a difference) is going to have to deal with the Airtran pilots.
 
What would the board of directors tell GK if he states SWA is losing money because of those lack of synergies? What about the stock holders at the annual stockholders meeting? I bet they will tell him to fix it, and fix it quick. They want PROFITS, not turmoil. This is starting to smell like the next USair, and that smells worse than Redflyer's last deposit at the ELP Airport La Quinta.



OYS

On another note, the share/stakeholders know the possible ramifications of this acquisition. It was spelled out in the SEC filings.
 
Where did I say the citizens of Atlanta or Delta were the culprits? How this: Nobody is going to give a damn about the supposed unfairness to the Airtran pilots in the General Public or how it turns out. Are you with the Fed? Ben is that you? Timmy Geithner? Is that you too? Your living in a world of make believe and fantasy. Sorry.
It's all about marketing, politics and the law. Sooner or later those realities will become apparent.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top